FanboyX_Returns
Civilian
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2006
- Messages
- 345
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 11
You mean his one Superman movie that grossed $200,000,000? The one with strong DVD sales and almost $50 million in rentals? That one?
Yea the one that cost ALOT more then BATMAN BEGINS to produce, and market, and made LESS then Batman Begins in both dvd sales, and domestic boxoffice.
Oh, and hasn't yet turned a profit? Yea I think he means that one.
Yea I saw it coming two years ago, and got bashed for it.. Now look at them the fans for the most part hated the movie.
Singer did a bad job in his film dude face it... The movie was a giant pile of doggy poo with some Matrix like fx.
lol they even shot some of the scenes in the same part of town in Sydney Australia as the godawful Matrix series.
Singer had to much control of the project, and the WB let him do whatever he wanted, and it cost them... The movie will eventually turn a profit but in all reality this movie should have been as big if not bigger then Spiderman.
Even with the current boxoffice slump it should have done Pirates 2 numbers.
The facts are Singer had a bad idea for a movie, and he pitched it to a bunch of people at the WB that don't know how to really handle their dc characters. They liked the idea because they thought anything he thought up was going to be a winner after Xmen 2.
Well the old term "Don't judge a book by its cover" apply here.
Singer's Xmen 1 was terrible, and Xmen 2 was only watchable due to the action which was ordered by the studio when the first cut of the movie was done.
They paid alot of money to get some more action in the movie because he turned in an almost actionless Superhero movie... Sound familiar?
Anyway I hope I make it to my 60's so I could see another director get a crack at making a REAL Superman movie!


