The Dark Knight The Official Plot holes thread.

The number one complaint on here is that Nolan didn't show the Joker leaving the penthouse. That is not a plot hole. People just refuse to use their imaginations.

problem here is, that the problems just seem to occur when you use your imagination. Maybe you refuse to do so:whatever:


If Nolan doesn't show what happen, you should just assume that he escaped because the story moved on.

Why should I? Im not that easy. It is a pacing-mistake any advertent observer should be able to point out:o
 
Why did Joker leave the penthouse?

Because he figured, by the way Batman jumped after Rachel, Dent was Batman. He mentions the fact that he thought Dent was Batman later on in the film.

Then he obviously left, because he was looking for Dent.

:brucebat:
 
Why should I? Im not that easy. It is a pacing-mistake any advertent observer should be able to point out:o


This doesn't make sense.

Are you saying that all viewers should say:

"Did he escape?" after the scene?

Of course he escaped; this is just as silly as saying "Rachel's not dead, cause we don't see a body or a funeral"


I mean OBVIOUSLY Joker wasn't going to stick around and fight Batman; he knows he can win in a fight with the guy. Plus he didn't find Dent. Staying any longer would put his plan in danger. He RAN away from Batman.


You need to SEE that? I mean come on...like someone said; sometimes I think some people on this board need a matching coloring book to get the full effect of the film.


Why don't we see Joker telling all his bank heist goons to kill one another?

why don't we see the drug transaction between Crane and the Chechen?

Why don't we see what happened to Gordon after he faked his death?

Why don't we see what happened to all the tumbler pieces?

Why don't we see how the cop got caught by Joker at M.C.U.?
 
yea it pretty clear the joker used rachel as a distraction to make his escape.
 
I don't think Joker says it clearly. He asked him, "How about we cut you up and feed you to your little pooches." (See what I'm doing here? I'm arguing for argument's sake.)

Why focus on Lau? If Maroni, the Chechen, and Lau are equally important as you say, then why not care that they didn't acknowledge what happened to Maroni and the Chechen either?

Because Joker clearly states what's going to happen to the Russian and we see what happens to Maroni because Dent puts on his seat belt before crashing the car. Their arcs have a properly indicated conclusion. Lau doesn't. We see him on top of the pile, and then we don't see him anymore, nor does Joker acknowledge his presence in any way when he starts the fire, nor do we hear any screams of agony although I'm pretty sure Lau wasn't gagged.

All I'm saying is that his death could've been handled a lot simpler. Instead it wasn't handled AT ALL.
 
why would the joker acknowledge him? i think it makes him more cold and monstrous that someone is burning to death a few feet away and he doesn't really give a toss
 
Simple fact is they're enough people here pointing things out to signify that enough people had problems with plotting. It's also been referred to in countless "official" reviews that can be read on Rotten Tomatoes etc.

It's not a case of lacking imagination, it's simply the more astute people clearly seeing that somethings amiss. The penthouse scene is a perfect example, as I've said before, it just feels unfinished.
 
I don't understand why everyone wants to see/hear Lau screeming in pain and see him die. A) He's onto of the money pile, Joker sets it on fire, Joker kills Lau. Not that hard to determine. B) Do you really really really want to see a guy burning to death? I mean common that's a bit sick.

That scene was focusing on the Joker and how in that moment he pretty much has taken over Gotham's underworld. Joker didn't focus on Lau so why should we? It was all about the Joker so we should focus on the Joker.
 
This doesn't make sense.

Are you saying that all viewers should say:

"Did he escape?" after the scene?

Of course he escaped; this is just as silly as saying "Rachel's not dead, cause we don't see a body or a funeral"


I mean OBVIOUSLY Joker wasn't going to stick around and fight Batman; he knows he can win in a fight with the guy. Plus he didn't find Dent. Staying any longer would put his plan in danger. He RAN away from Batman.


You need to SEE that? I mean come on...like someone said; sometimes I think some people on this board need a matching coloring book to get the full effect of the film.


Why don't we see Joker telling all his bank heist goons to kill one another?

why don't we see the drug transaction between Crane and the Chechen?

Why don't we see what happened to Gordon after he faked his death?

Why don't we see what happened to all the tumbler pieces?

Why don't we see how the cop got caught by Joker at M.C.U.?

Sorry I just see my mistake:woot:. I misunderstood that guy. Of course one should assume he escapes, there's no way around. To me it'd just seem a little difficult to escape with Batman waiting on the street.
If I had to guess how the scene continues after Bruce' and Rachel's fall without seeing how it acctually turns out in the film, I'd put my money on Bruce taking further actions to stop the lunatic who is still in the building. It was a loose end and it sucked imo.
I would love to see the scene ending with Joker leaving with a hostage and bats not having a chance to do anything but give him one hell of a staredown while he gets into the car:brucebat:

Well maybe they were ready to reshoot/extend it but couldn't without Heath. In that case i'd take back my comments about sloppy directing.
 
Sorry I just see my mistake:woot:. I misunderstood that guy. Of course one should assume he escapes, there's no way around. To me it'd just seem a little difficult to escape with Batman waiting on the street.
If I had to guess how the scene continues after Bruce' and Rachel's fall without seeing how it acctually turns out in the film, I'd put my money on Bruce taking further actions to stop the lunatic who is still in the building. It was a loose end and it sucked imo.
I would love to see the scene ending with Joker leaving with a hostage and bats not having a chance to do anything but give him one hell of a staredown while he gets into the car:brucebat:

Well maybe they were ready to reshoot/extend it but couldn't without Heath. In that case i'd take back my comments about sloppy directing.

O.K. this makes more sense.


I'm still ok with it; because, its kind of pointless. What the scene would establish is that Joker got away...when we see Joker later we would have already known that; therefore a scene like that in a 2 and a half hour movie is a bit pointless. It was probably shot; but, in editing they said: 'The movie is going on kind of long lets take this out"


that being said this is HARDLY a plot hole. With or without it; we know he escapes.
 
Sorry I just see my mistake:woot:. I misunderstood that guy. Of course one should assume he escapes, there's no way around. To me it'd just seem a little difficult to escape with Batman waiting on the street.
If I had to guess how the scene continues after Bruce' and Rachel's fall without seeing how it acctually turns out in the film, I'd put my money on Bruce taking further actions to stop the lunatic who is still in the building. It was a loose end and it sucked imo.
I would love to see the scene ending with Joker leaving with a hostage and bats not having a chance to do anything but give him one hell of a staredown while he gets into the car:brucebat:

Well maybe they were ready to reshoot/extend it but couldn't without Heath. In that case i'd take back my comments about sloppy directing.

Have you ever been to a big city? It looks like Bruce's penthouse took up a whole block. Is Batman supposed to run around hoping Joker would pop out of the lobby or even a back service entrance? There's probably an underground parking structure or even a parking structure attached to the building for all we know. Big buildings like that have many exits. That's what I meant when I said use your imagination.
 
Plot holes, by definition, would mean that something was left out of the movie that would cause the plot or story to not make sense. The number one complaint on here is that Nolan didn't show the Joker leaving the penthouse. That is not a plot hole. People just refuse to use their imaginations. If Nolan doesn't show what happen, you should just assume that he escaped because the story moved on.
Thank you.

Because Joker clearly states what's going to happen to the Russian and we see what happens to Maroni because Dent puts on his seat belt before crashing the car. Their arcs have a properly indicated conclusion. Lau doesn't. We see him on top of the pile, and then we don't see him anymore, nor does Joker acknowledge his presence in any way when he starts the fire, nor do we hear any screams of agony although I'm pretty sure Lau wasn't gagged.
The last scene with Lau would only be a plot hole if we saw him running around unharmed later, because we clearly see Lau on top of the money pile, then Joker burns it, and then you don't see Lau anymore. Not showing Lau burning to death is NOT a plot hole.

In the same vein, you can make the conclusion that the MCU cop Joker took hostage was unharmed after the escape, because you see him later on in the film, alive, but with a bandage on his neck. Nolan didn't feel the need to show that cop ducking down during the explosion, and nobody's complaining about that scene, are they? :oldrazz: (Or maybe I just gave you more ammunition, LOL!)

Simple fact is they're enough people here pointing things out to signify that enough people had problems with plotting. It's also been referred to in countless "official" reviews that can be read on Rotten Tomatoes etc.

It's not a case of lacking imagination, it's simply the more astute people clearly seeing that somethings amiss. The penthouse scene is a perfect example, as I've said before, it just feels unfinished.
Funny, because lots of people here have questions that none of my friends (nor I) had after seeing the film once. Of course, the confused people are the ones making the most noise, because they're confused. It doesn't mean that "most" people who saw TDK have these same issues.

And my screenwriter friends are the ones most impressed with the plot, btw. Not to say they don't think there's issues with dialogue (there always is..) but they're all quite impressed by the plotting. Not all critics are screenwriters, you know.
 
Simple fact is they're enough people here pointing things out to signify that enough people had problems with plotting. It's also been referred to in countless "official" reviews that can be read on Rotten Tomatoes etc.

It's not a case of lacking imagination, it's simply the more astute people clearly seeing that somethings amiss. The penthouse scene is a perfect example, as I've said before, it just feels unfinished.

Riiiiiiight. So since you brought up Rotten Tomatoes which gave TDK 14 negative reviews, 9 of those were from critics who felt that the movie was too dark and wasn't fun enough. So you're saying that you, these 5 other critics, and a handful of others here are more astute? I honestly don't think these 5 critics are pointing out these minor "plot holes" that some here are. If so, I would like to see these comments.

BTW, astute would imply that the other 99% of people (yes, others exist outside this forum) missed something while you didn't. I can't speak for others (but I can assume most would agree) that when they didn't show the Joker escape and the movie moved on, we all figured out that the Joker escaped. It didn't sit well with you, the minority here, because you needed to see something more.

I completely agree with Holeshot that this movie should have been accompanied with a coloring book. The mods should change the name of this thread to "Nitpicks" or just close this thread already and merge it with the "Ask a Question" thread that's sticked above since it's basically the same content. Actually, I vote for close this sucker.
 
Thank you.


The last scene with Lau would only be a plot hole if we saw him running around unharmed later, because we clearly see Lau on top of the money pile, then Joker burns it, and then you don't see Lau anymore. Not showing Lau burning to death is NOT a plot hole.

NO, thank YOU! :yay:

You said exactly what I was trying to say.
 
Ok, it's not a plot hole. It's a poorly handled scene. I will now look for the poorly handled scenes thread. :))

And once and for all, I don't want to see Lau dying a gruesome death for crying out loud. I just don't understand why they had to plop him in the middle of the pile of cash and forget about him when they could've easily had Joker dispose of him later or something. Hell, he didn't even have to be on camera. Joker could've made some remark about harakiri-ing the guy once he told him where the money is. I don't know. I just know that me, myself and I, can't speak for anybody else, feel that that particular character was handled poorly toward the end. :)
 
Riiiiiiight. So since you brought up Rotten Tomatoes which gave TDK 14 negative reviews, 9 of those were from critics who felt that the movie was too dark and wasn't fun enough. So you're saying that you, these 5 other critics, and a handful of others here are more astute? I honestly don't think these 5 critics are pointing out these minor "plot holes" that some here are. If so, I would like to see these comments.

BTW, astute would imply that the other 99% of people (yes, others exist outside this forum) missed something while you didn't. I can't speak for others (but I can assume most would agree) that when they didn't show the Joker escape and the movie moved on, we all figured out that the Joker escaped. It didn't sit well with you, the minority here, because you needed to see something more.

I completely agree with Holeshot that this movie should have been accompanied with a coloring book. The mods should change the name of this thread to "Nitpicks" or just close this thread already and merge it with the "Ask a Question" thread that's sticked above since it's basically the same content. Actually, I vote for close this sucker.

Yeah fine, whatever. Merely pointing out that this one of the busiest threads here. And I wasn't referring to reviewers having a problem with it being too dark or blah blah blah. Simply that the plotting was messy.

Saying that I don't agree that it's nitpicking, though the person who implied all these issues could instead be attributed to poorly handled scenes has a good point.
 
[quote="V";15398404]
You'd assume so, but Gordon has only just arrived at MCU at that point.[/quote]

I still dont see why that ment they could not have arranged it just before the sceen.

Even if Gordan just got there all it would have taken is a few seconds and besides Batman could have called Gordan on the phone while he was on the way in.

[quote="V";15398404] I just don't see how he could have had that conversation with Batman who then was able to sneak through without anybody (besides Gordon) knowing that he was in there. [/quote]

Again Batman sneaks into all kind of police stations,Government offices and prisons all the time in the comics.

He even snuck into the White House a few times with no one seeing him.

I dont see why Nolans Batman wouldnt be able to do the same.

[quote="V";15398404]Yes, but it would seem that he was in that room alone with Joker before Gordon appeared! So why didn't he start interrogating Joker as soon as the last cop speaking to Joker left the room?[/quote]

Because Gordan wanted a chance to do things by the Book first.

And by waiting for Gordan to leave the room it gives Gordan plausible deny ability.

The Joker [or any suspect cant prove that the police had any knowlige that Batman was there.
[quote="V";15398404] The other explanation could be that he wasn't in the room until after Gordon get there, which brings up the question: how did he get in the room?[/quote]

Even that question has an eazy answer....There's got to be an air vent in the room.Batman could have entered threw it.

[quote="V";15398404]But if he was in the room all the time surely he'd have seen that Joker wasn't going to answer any of the questions, because he didn't say anything to the others?[/quote]

Why would he assume that the Joker wouldnt talk to him???

Batman has never encountered the Joker before so how would he know that he couldnt scare it out of him like he does other common crooks.

Your questions come from the frame of mind of someone who understands the characters and thats good but the two characters in question dont have a relationship with each other at that point.

Batman was only starting to understand how sick Joke is.Batman may have still thought he might have a chance at getting the questions answered by just scaring him.


[quote="V";15398404] He was either in the room all along (which means he could never have spoken to Gordon and he wouldn't have known that he was in there...)[/quote]
Like I said all it would have taken was a few seconds on the phone.

[quote="V";15398404] or he got in the room at the same time as Gordon, but how on earth did he manage to do that!?[/quote]
He could have gotten into the room a few different ways.

[quote="V";15398404]
That's interesting. I suppose that there's a slight argument in that this is a police station and not a psych ward, but I can't believe that they didn't have people ready on the other side.[/quote]

By law they are required to.

[quote="V";15398404]It seems like Batman's entrance in this is a plot hole that was overlooked for the dramatic impact, as many films do.[/quote]

Or you can chuck it up to Batman doing one of the more impossible things he always does in the comics.

Ether way I find sneaking into a room of people much more believable then guliding over the city with your cape.:wow:

[quote="V";15398404]I know that Joker found the money... that's why he went and got Lau. But my question still remains: just what did the mob hire Joker for? It's made out that it's to kill the Batman - which he doesn't do - so why would they let him take half? Is there something in the film where he says he'll get their money back if they give him half and I've just missed it?[/quote]

Your still not getting it.

Let me try to break it down.

They hired Joker to kill Batman.

Lao hid all the mobs money.

Joker found all the money.

Joker called the mob and told them where the money was.

It was the Joker who was giving the Mob back their money minus his cut.

They couldnt stop him from taking his half.

[quote="V";15398404]Why not? He had his men and his dogs with him.[/quote]

The Joker had some of his men there too ....remember the guy that was poring the gas?????.It was a stand off.

[quote="V";15398404] He was happy for Joker to walk out with half without putting up a fight,[/quote]

Because Joker had found it.

If you lost a million dollars and someone found it wouldnt you let them have half of it back?????

And when he did move to stop Joker he was killed for it.

[quote="V";15398404]Yep. But he burns it all.[/quote]

Not the way I saw it.

Joker said he was only burning his half.

[quote="V";15398404]
Thirty hours is a long time to go without sleep![/quote]


Yes it is.
 
Joker left the penthouse because he didn't find Harvey.

That's not a plothole.

I supposed Nolan should have shown it. For the dummies who can't go from A to B on they're own.

But then again, leading a viewer by the hand like some child is ****ing horrible.
 
I still dont see why that ment they could not have arranged it just before the sceen.

Even if Gordan just got there all it would have taken is a few seconds and besides Batman could have called Gordan on the phone while he was on the way in.

My point is, if he did speak to Gordon before he got in the room, how did he sneak in the room? And if he was in the room all along, how didn't Joker hear him talking to Gordon on the phone?!

Again Batman sneaks into all kind of police stations,Government offices and prisons all the time in the comics.

He even snuck into the White House a few times with no one seeing him.

I dont see why Nolans Batman wouldnt be able to do the same.

Yes, he does to this. But I can't personally recall one where he sneaks into a sealed interrogation room? Nolan's Batman is able to sneak into police stations and the like (think Gordon's office in Begins) but getting into an apparently sealed room?

Because Gordan wanted a chance to do things by the Book first.

And by waiting for Gordan to leave the room it gives Gordan plausible deny ability.

The Joker [or any suspect cant prove that the police had any knowlige that Batman was there.

I would give you Gordon wanting to do things by the book, but Batman doesn't; and if he was in that interrogation room before Gordon got there I don't believe that he'd have just stood there when he knew Dent's life was at stake. This suggests to me that Batman got in the room when Gordon did, but how did he do it!?

Even that question has an eazy answer....There's got to be an air vent in the room.Batman could have entered threw it.

Looking at the official pictures, I can't see any air vents? And if there was would Batman be able to squeeze through without making a noise and not letting Joker know that he was in there?

Why would he assume that the Joker wouldnt talk to him???

I inferred that Joker's been interrogated by the other cops and hasn't said a word, so if Batman was in the room all that time then I'd have thought he could see that Joker wasn't going to co-operate.


Batman has never encountered the Joker before so how would he know that he couldnt scare it out of him like he does other common crooks.

He has met Joker before this point in the film, and has been able to see that he's not a 'common crook'. He even considers giving himself up because of the Joker! He knows he's far from ordinary by this point of the film.

Your questions come from the frame of mind of someone who understands the characters and thats good but the two characters in question dont have a relationship with each other at that point.

Batman was only starting to understand how sick Joke is.Batman may have still thought he might have a chance at getting the questions answered by just scaring him.

I can't agree with this because Batman has had plenty of evidence that Joker wasn't what he's been dealing with before. He even says "He [Batman] can't endure this." Joker had already pushed Bruce to a breaking point with his actions. I think the fact that he starts beating the hell out of Joker instantly suggests that he knows he cant just scare him. That he's going to have to push his usual boundries.

Like I said all it would have taken was a few seconds on the phone.

But if he was in the room the whole time with Joker, Joker surely would have heard Batman on the phone to Gordon (especially with Bale's Batman voice : o )

He could have gotten into the room a few different ways.

I can only see one point of entry other than the one Gordon comes through, and that's the door behind Joker - but those are heavy doors and would surely make a noise , however slight, and alert Joker to somebody else entering the room.

By law they are required to.

But they obviously didn't as nobody went in.

Or you can chuck it up to Batman doing one of the more impossible things he always does in the comics.

Ether way I find sneaking into a room of people much more believable then guliding over the city with your cape.:wow:

But this is a film, it's not the comics, and sometimes things happen in film for dramatic impacts because it's an entirely different medium to film. I think it's a great scene, and it doesn't ruin the film for me or anything, but I think it takes liberties as regards him getting in there. It's supposed to surprise us, which it does, and if they gave us any hint that he was in there it would ruin that surprise. So I can see why they did it.

Your still not getting it.

I do.

Let me try to break it down.

Alright.

They hired Joker to kill Batman.

Yes, that's what he offered his services for.

Lao hid all the mobs money.

Yes, he put in a 'safe place' for them.

Joker found all the money.

Yes, he got Lau to take him to the money.

Joker called the mob and told them where the money was.

Yep. He's surprised when Maroni doesn't appear.

It was the Joker who was giving the Mob back their money minus his cut.

But why were they going to let him take his cut? You said yourself that they hired him to kill Batman who was their 'real' problem as he put it. Maybe I've blanked out a big scene where they tell him to get Lau back for them?

They couldnt stop him from taking his half.

Why not? These aren't defenceless people; they are hardened criminals. When Joker burns the money he tries to stop him.

The Joker had some of his men there too ....remember the guy that was poring the gas?????.It was a stand off.

Yes, but Cechen and his men aren't rollovers. He never seems to have any intentions of stopping Joker from taking the cash.

Because Joker had found it.

So the reason they let him have half is because he got it back for them? This does seem to be the only option there is, but it just seems weak because Joker doesn't fulfill his promise of killing Batman, which means that their real problem still hadn't been solved and the money could easily be taken away again because of this. Maroni isn't even bothered about the money because he gives its (and Joker's) locations up to Gordon.

If you lost a million dollars and someone found it wouldnt you let them have half of it back?????

Quite a hypothetical question! If I were a criminal who had all of that dirty money and had earnt it through killing people and the like, no I probably wouldn't be giving somebody half for finding it; in fact, I'd probably be killing them! And I certainly wouldn't pay somebody if they didn't do the job I hired them to do.

And when he did move to stop Joker he was killed for it.

Yep. That's what you get for dealing with The Joker.

Not the way I saw it.

No, it's supposed to be all of the money. That was its location.

Joker said he was only burning his half.

Yeah, he was burning his half but it was in with their half, which is why Cechen tries to stop him!



Yes it is.

You and me, I think we're destined to do this forever... ;)
 
who cares how batman got in the interrogation room? hes a fecking ninja for gods sake. some of you people really want to treated like children dont ya?
 
who cares how batman got in the interrogation room? hes a fecking ninja for gods sake. some of you people really want to treated like children dont ya?
Chris Nolan : ok kids now hold my hand. This is Bruce assembling his suit, as you can see he needs Alfreds help.

Fan : Mr. Nolan when are we going to see the Joker?

(Nolan backhand slaps the fan)
Chris Nolan: I WILL NOT CUT A THING!
 
Chris Nolan : ok kids now hold my hand. This is Bruce assembling his suit, as you can see he needs Alfreds help.

Fan : Mr. Nolan when are we going to see the Joker?

(Nolan backhand slaps the fan)
Chris Nolan: I WILL NOT CUT A THING!
Still my SHH Hero
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,076,842
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"