Charlie No-One
iamamiwhoami
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2004
- Messages
- 7,531
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
No problem. All my friends who are die hard Harry fans have said it was the worst movie and that it destroyed their favorite book.
Gary didn't do the last film so they just had it be a cgi creation. no need this time though..
They took out the attack on Arthur?
How does Gambon come off when discussing the prophecy/his mistake at the end? One of my biggest complaints is how mean new-Dumbledore is. Is he a bit softer in that scene?
Thats...kind of worries me
Are the Centaurs in it or did they just fill their role with Grawp?
Thats...kind of worries me
Are the Centaurs in it or did they just fill their role with Grawp?
It was the 3rd best IMO. I still think Goblet of Fire and Prisoner of Azkaban are by far the best ones with Order of the Phoenix a distant 3rd. I do think this was one of best when it comes to the trio's acting.
Thats...kind of worries me
Are the Centaurs in it or did they just fill their role with Grawp?
No, the centaurs are there. In the film (two actors were hired to play Magorian and Bane in the film, but their lines were probably cut), they don't speak at all, nor is Firenze mentioned or seen. They're in two scenes, total, and both involve Grawp.
Does Dumbledore bring Fierenze in to teach? That is such a great scene in the book.
Nope, no Firenze teaching. Which actually leaves us with a plot hole because Trelawney is fired so who's teaching divination...lol
One wtf moment in the movie is when Sirius is in the trainstation wearing a bathrobe.
Well, I suppose the locket is only fan speculation at this point (then again, it was on the UK cover of Book 7...so maybe not). Still, I'm glad Newell is trying to actually connect the movies. Anything regarding Snape? I felt in GOF he was sort of just wrote off as the mean teacher. Did they hint at how much more significant he would become? I guess it is hard not to being as he gives the Occlumency lessons.
Nope, no Firenze teaching. Which actually leaves us with a plot hole because Trelawney is fired so who's teaching divination...lol
One wtf moment in the movie is when Sirius is in the trainstation wearing a bathrobe.
lolI'm just scared to see the movie now.
I liked this movie, but another wtf moment is how Ron, Hermione, and Ginny rode on the Thestrals without being able to see them. It could have explained that a bit.Nope, no Firenze teaching. Which actually leaves us with a plot hole because Trelawney is fired so who's teaching divination...lol
One wtf moment in the movie is when Sirius is in the trainstation wearing a bathrobe.
Gambon is much better in this film but that scene is barely in. In the movie, it's less than a minute and doesn't really explain anything.
Lee would make an excellent Rufus Scrimgeour. Also, don't forget Anthony Hopkins and Patrick Stewart (god, I would've loved Hopkins for Moody).
Really? That is so odd for such an important scene. I mean, its not like Priori Incantem where even though confusing isn't really of much importance. The prophecy is the focal point of the entire plot. How can they not explain it?
I agree with you......he plays my favorite character....The direction of this film was poor. The film was all over the place.
If it wasn't for Ralph Fiennes it would have been a total loss.
![]()
chaseter said:someone saying they didn't like the movie because Voldemort wasn't in most of the movie is dumb
Completely agree. It's the most disappointing thing about the entire film.