I don't appreciate people who lie on the internet to "win" arguments or "counter" points.
I don't believe you have read "HUNDREDS" of books on history.
I have a friend who actually has a problematic addiction to books. I have refused to ever help him move again because he has thousands of books. I highly doubt that this bookfreak would say that he's read "HUNDREDS" of history books, and I don't believe you either.
It's sufficient to say "I've read plenty of history books.", but you damage your credibility by saying "hundreds"....UNLESS, I'm wrong and you really have, which would be cool...and I'd ask again, "hundreds" has to be at least 200, but can go all the way up to 900...so, which extremity are you closer to? 200, or up closer to a thousand history books?