spideyboy_1111
Young Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2001
- Messages
- 66,458
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 33
look good to me... i think Ramos's art actually kinda fits runaways.
look good to me... i think Ramos's art actually kinda fits runaways.
thats his style though, he's not TRYING to draw proportionately.
look good to me... i think Ramos's art actually kinda fits runaways.
I think the art is better suited for an all-out humor comic, but I can tolerate it here.I hated Ramos, but after I saw theese preview pages, I changed my mind
http://comics.ign.com/articles/899/899461p1.html
I'm too used to seeing the Runaways draw by people who understand things like proportion and anatomy.![]()
The only caveat with the YA/RUNAWAYS SI crossover is that a lot of the YA bits have been written by Bendis in the event proper, so in a way they have to follow that sequence and this are more predictable. Still, it continues after Whedon's run ends and does focus on some other characters.
The YA PRESENTS mini I am sure will be in trade form by Christmas, so I would suggest waiting for that.
Initiative is great, reminds me of how I felt about Vaughnan's run on Runaways.
Really? I was under the impression that his comics sold okay.
Most of his books only sold well because they were X-titles or a Spidey title, but if you look, they tended to drop a lil I believe, sales wise, when he would take over or whatever he would do. X-Men didn't really even come close to Astonishing or Uncanny when he was drawing. New X-Men was the lowest seller of the Messiah Complex tie ins, IIRC. Even his Wolverine issues of Civil War didn't make much of a dent I believe. Even if it wasn't, it sure was close to X-Factor, which was down there too. I don't know how Spectacular Spidey did when it started, but I know it didn't really ever come close to Amazing.
no offense, but half of those titles went through a bad wrighting slump at that time too...