What about it? The simplest explanation tends to be the right one....true. How does that apply to this situation? The simplest explanation for our large immigrant population is because they want a better life for their children, but can't get it legally due to poor immigration policy on behalf of the US.
Yep, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
"The 11.4 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States collectively paid $11.84 billion in state and local taxes in 2012. ITEPs analysis finds their combined nationwide state and local tax contributions would increase by $845 million under full implementation of the administrations 2012 and 2014 executive actions and by $2.2 billion under comprehensive immigration reform."
http://www.itep.org/immigration/
If they aren't lawbreakers, then we aren't talking about them.
So, the plan is to round up the older generation, deport them, and leave the kids to fend for themselves? That sounds like a great policy. And many people ARE talking about them. Conservatives got in an uproar over the dreamers.
Un-Christain? This isn't a What Would Jesus Do after school special. Religion has no place in this discussion.
Hey, you're not going to see me say that we should decide public policy on theology. I'm simply pointing out that many of those who are pro-deportation are also supposedly Christian. I'm just showing the disconnect there. Deporting and separating families is cruel. It's both an economic issue and a moral issue. As an atheist, I have a serious problem with hypocric, and how so many people don't tackle the moral question... probably because illegal immigrants don't look the way we do.
Again with the word great... Let's see the numbers. What would the tax revenue be for the undocumented workers? What does that say to the other immigrants that decided to wait and play by the rules?
This is making the perfect the enemy of the good. We shouldn't pass immigration reform because it might hurt the feelings of others? No. I'm sorry that it was an unfair situation, but that shouldn't stop us from making progress. And I'll say again... our immigration system is broken. You say, "well what about the people who did it the right way?" Well, most of those people are still waiting or have waited for over a decade. Reforming our system and allowing people to come in speedily and a fairly helps everyone; even those already here.
I say for every undocumented worker that is deported, two legal immigrants should be brought in! I promise you they will likely earn much more than the undocumented worker. More earned means more taxes. Plus we can keep the character card!
This is a very weird argument. Do you think it'd actually pass the conservative House? nope. And you're making a case for why nationalization helps the economy. What's the point in excluding a big chunk of people? Is it punishment? For me, I don't care about punishing people for doing something you or I would do for our families. And no.. you can't keep the character card if you deport and break up millions of families. That's like saying, "well we're drastically reducing slavery, so we can still keep the high ground." It doesn't work that way.
You do see what you are doing here right? You speak of what's fair and ignore that the people you are advocating for are hear because they cheated the system in some fashion. What about the immigrants that fill out the proper paper work? That leave when their visas expire? What about the family that waits patiently? What's fair for them?
Again, I'm not going to postpone progress in the effort for fairness. That's like saying, "well we can't go to electric cars, because there's a whole industry based on dirty SUVs." Well, I'm sorry.... those workers are going to have to change, and the country would be better off for it.
And no, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that a broken immigration system doesn't give very many options. We are in effect, forcing people to break the law similar to how we did with prohibition. Set up standards for entrance, but allow entrance to happen, and you won't have as many law breakers.
Are you going to use them to rebuild our infrastructure?
Sure.....?
There was this event in Germany in the 1940s where a charismatic leader convinced people that foreigners were their biggest problem. Sound familiar? You can shrug it off all you want, but this sort of rhetoric is dangerous. It threatens to dehumanize these folks, when in reality, they are just trying to have a good home, a source of food for their kids, and medical care. They'd pay taxes if we gave them an avenue to do so. Calling them criminals only makes them go further into hiding and helps no one.
I'm pretty sure the United States has it's fair share of immigrants. And why is saying that the country is near capacity white privilege? You can't pursue the American dream illegally. This is a nation built on laws.
And if those laws are inhumane, they need to be adjusted. We do have a fair share of immigrants, because that's who we are! Our whole culture is built upon the idea of the melting pot; that IS the American Dream. That anyone regardless of circumstance or upbringing can make it with a little hard work. If we take that away from immigrants, then what we're saying is that the dream is only meant for us... which ostensibly kills it.
And come on... the country isn't near capacity? Are you serious? There are many states with small populations but a lot of land. Saying that we are all full is such hogwash.... and it's an example of making up silly arguments to rationalize your privileged status.
If it's a nation built on laws, then why don't we make some? Instead of saying.... well we need a wall.. why don't we actually reform policy to allow immigrants to earn citizenship in due time?