B
[insert witty comment]
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 12,273
- Reaction score
- 3,896
- Points
- 103
I think him and Batman are the only two you can get away with that with. We've seen both of their origins so many times I don't think you need to directly show it again any time soon.
Spider-Man's in somewhat of a unique situation in that the character has now had 3 film reboots inside 15 years & in the 2 prior non-MCU reboots, the 1st films of each series, while different, did focus heavily on the death of Uncle Ben & the character's first appearances in public. The MCU somewhat basically glossed over that whole saga & picked up 6 months later ie Civil War.
Even though it has been done to death on film, it saddens me that the most popular Marvel character is in fact the only one within the MCU that hasn't got an origin story.. I still don't like how they hastily threw him in to Civil War, seemed like a gimmick to sell more tickets, he was completely irrelevant to the whole film.
And Superman, and the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and we may even include the Flash sometime down the road.
Superman & Batman's origins are more pop culture sort of things, I suppose you could include Spider-Man in that also but a lot less so.
On film however Man of Steel 2013 & Batman Begins 2005 were the first origin films for both Superman/Batman in 15+ years.

