I don't think the poor ratings were the result of indy love fests but what happens when guys aren't booked right.
While Daniel Bryan as a World Champion is a stretch for a lot of people, the major reason iMO is because there was no build up. His title win came out of nowhere. It's another case of the company hotshotting the title on someone and expecting him to get over instantly because of it despite history showing that can't happen. Bryan was booked horribly after winning MITB. It's pretty much what happened to Jack Swagger.
When Miz won the WWE title, it felt believeable for the most part because he was booked decently for several months. He was over with the crowd. Now what happened afterwards is a whole other story entirely.
Beth as champion isn't a problem...the problem is she's booked like crap, the way majority the women's division is.
thread has had that picture posted around of all the current champions - Punk, Bryan, Ryder, Kofi, Bourne, Cody, Beth...
And that's why ratings tanked. That image might be an IWC circle jerk fest, but that's not exactly a group of stars that are going to carry a company to the next level.
Punk? Good.
Ryder? I still don't understand why he's so over, but he is. He's holding the perfect belt.
Cody? Getting better. Not quite at that "next level", but he's good.
Kofi and Bourne? *yawn*
But the absolute worst in that picture?
Daniel Bryan.
And I'm not trying to knock him. I'm really not. He's a good in ring talent that deserves to get some recognition. But World Heavyweight Championship? No.
When I was at the Money In The Bank PPV watching at Hooters, I saw people walk out of the restaurant when Daniel Bryan won the briefcase.
So it doesn't surprise me that viewers are tuning out when CM Punk is having a circle jerk in the ring with Ryder and Bryan.
It probably doesn't help any that everyone knew how that match was going to end. There was no suspense. Guys like Del Rio, Miz, they aren't allowed to get over clean on someone (wow, did I just say "get over clean"? What's happening to me??)
But seriously, it's predictable. We all know how it's gonna end. And that segment was way too "indy love" for my tastes, and probably for the tastes of a lot of the general audience.
That doesn't mean take the belt off Punk. Or Ryder. Or even Bryan. I don't like that Bryan has the belt, but he has it, and the answer isn't to make him look bad by ripping it off of him. But let's cut back on the indy love fests. That was way too much for me the other night. Monday Night was like what happens when the smarks get control, and it really showed to me.
I've said it before countless times, but one way to improve the ratings is to strengthen the IC title and tag titles. Whoever was feuding for the IC title was more than enough to keep anyone's attention when the ratings were great. As a matter of fact, it gave a hot as hell Rock and Triple H something to vie for when Shawn Michaels and Stone Cold were feuding for the title. Not only did you have to tune in to see the latest in the main event, but seeing what was happening with the IC title was a really big deal back then. When Hulk Hogan was on top watching Macho Man defending the IC title was an incredibly huge deal to see.
The two guys holding the IC and U.S. title have all the talent in the world to make those titles big again, but who is Cody and Doplh feuding with to make that happen? It's like the tag titles. It was nice putting together Bourne and Kofi, but who have they been feuding with to elevate the title? They won the belts to some fanfare. WWE put some stock into it so that it felt like the tag titles were going to matter again, and now several weeks later they're just hanging out with some gold on their shoulders like all the other tag champs before then. Even before Bourne's suspension it was heading down that path.
Make the secondary titles matter again and everything won't have to rise and fall on what's happening in the main event. Even though that's not the case as y'all have been saying, but WWE thinks too much like that.
I was watching Austin's latest DVD/Blu-Ray the other day, and noticed they played 'Cult of Personality' over one of his montages. I wonder if that's where Punk got the idea for his new theme, especially considering his admiration for Austin, and that he did 'that' shoot promo wearing an Austin t-shirt.![]()
![]()
I disagree. I still think Miz will be in the title scene. Its just that Sheamus is in good favor with management now (kinda of like when Boogeyman squashed JBL clean at the 2006 Rumble) and on a different brand so he got the win. The guy has been on a roll. Hell, I can't even remember the last time Sheamus lost a match so if anything, he'll be in a high profile match at Wrestlemania.
Agreed. But Austin was the catalyst/foundations, which the 'Attitude Era' was built on.
I don't know what Bryan's character was like on the Indy circuit when he was Bryan Danielson, American Dragon and all that. I don't know if he was a badass, or if he's character was much the same. But if Bryan is going to be taken seriously, his entire character needs a major facelift. Cole might be a *****e, but there's a tad bit of truth to what he says in regards to Bryan. I mean, continuing the comparison to Chris Benoit, Benoit even had a badass sounding finisher name - the CRIPPLER Crossface. Bryan's is called the Labell Lock... (spelling?)... Oooh, intimidating.
Benoit wasn't booked as a glorified jobber.
Oh really? I didn't know that. Actually now you mention it, it does ring a bell.He was using COP as his theme song when he was in ROH though.
Yeah. The part where he descibes his meeting of Hogan at the Raw 15the anniversary and then his meeting with Austin, are a complete contrast to each other.They used it for his HOF video. I though it was great. Even though Punk isn't trying to be Austin I definitely think he's inspired by some things about Austin. Like how genuine he came off. It wasn't just a gimmick and Austin was a straight shooter. He talked about how he felt when he felt like it. Said what he wanted when he wanted.
I bought the 4 disc dvd and so far I watched the documentary. It was great. One thing that struck me was Austin saying HE should have been in that spot working with Hogan at WM18. That kind of surprised me. I knew he was disappointed with his creative direction and loss of momentum but I have to wonder if he meant that literally? He's never put it like that before and I always thought Austin refused to work with Hogan for whatever reason (Hogan being a d***)
Fair point. I wasn't disregarding these facts, just stating that Austin was the catalst/foundation for the Inception of the 'Attitude Era', which arguably he was.I would say him and DX however as over as Austin was he still needed the hot angles and he got them, first with Bret and the Hart Foundation, then the ultimate one, the everyman tough guy vs the owner, probably the hottest angle in the history of the business.
Oh really? I didn't know that. Actually now you mention it, it does ring a bell.
Yeah. The part where he descibes his meeting of Hogan at the Raw 15the anniversary and then his meeting with Austin, are a complete contrast to each other.
I don't know about that. I don't think Austin has a problem with putting anyone over, but he just wants it to be done and set up right (i.e. the Borck Lesnar situation), which I can understand and respect.
The LeBell Lock is in reference to Judo Gene LeBell. As badass as they come. He also taught Roddy Piper some stuff.
For anybody who gets the reference is pretty impressive. Problem is I doubt most people know who LeBell is. Its more Bryans tribute to him...which makes perfect sense considering Bryans character.
WWE should play up the fact that Bryan was trained by HBK and particularly William Regal. Guys who DO have legit in ring credibility with the fans. Wrestling's always about the rub by association. People know Regal is tough as nails even if he aint a "star" and they believe Michaels can beat men 3 times his size despite being the smallest WWF champion of the 1990's.
Michaels was never seen as a badass or a tough guy a first. That changed when they put him against guy like Vader and Mankind. WWE needs to take a page out of their own book and let Bryan be ferocious in the ring. He might not be the greatest talker but he is a guy who can dish it out on that mat.
Here's my list. Bare with me fellas, my mind is still running through the matches from the year. Also, I didn't watch TNA much this year and I still haven't taken the time to watch Final Resolution, so this will probably all WWE for the most part.
Superstar of the year - CM Punk. This guy renewed my interest in wrestling. His promo on Cena at the end of June where he broke the fourth wall came at a time when I was starting to wane and watching wrestling was becoming a chore. Not only did he compel to keep watching, his actions got the media involved. Business Insider lists as a serious Player, the only person from wrestling mentioned. He's had great matches with everyone and I've enjoyed nearly every feud he's had this year. He's one of the few people that forces Cena to wrestle instead of play Superman
Face of the year - CM Punk. Read above.
Heel of the year - Cody Rhodes. Not too many heels stood out to me except for a couple: Ziggler and Rhodes. Cody takes the win because his character work has been good.
Top 5 Matches of the year -
1. Cena vs Punk I, Money In The Bank - The build up for this match had been tremendous. I thought when this match was going to happen that Punk would lose since his contract was ending, but after the promos, it felt like Punk could actually win and walk out with the belt. The emotion, the drama, this was what pro wrestling's all about. It felt epic, you weren't certain who was going to win. Giant, lengthy movesets and head drops don't matter if you can't do any of this stuff.
2. Cena vs Punk II, Summerslam - Cena's best match this year. He showed that he can deliver a technical match if he wanted to, and that his moveset is truly more than five moves. He and Punk have great chemistry together. I truly enjoyed it more from a technical, crisp and sharp move execution standpoint.
3. Edge vs Dolph Ziggler, Royal Rumble - One of Edge's final PPV bouts, he elevated Ziggler and they put on a good showing.
4.
5.
I'll have to come back to the other two slots at some other point. I could include Orton/Punk at Wrestlemania because it was good but I wouldn't call it one of the best matches.
Promo of the year - CM Punk, last RAW in June. Come on now.
PPV of the year - WWE Money in the Bank 2011
Best Moment of the year - CM Punk winning the title at Money in the Bank and escaping through the crowd. The look on Vince's face: PRICELESS.
Worst pushed wrestler of the year - I was going to say Del Rio, but I'm going to go with the Miz. Seriously, leading into Wrestlemania, who believed that Miz was capable of beating Cena? He didn't beat Orton clean at the Royal Rumble, he had problems beating Jerry Lawler, a retired wrestler who's glory days are two decades past. On top of that, he was eclipsed by the Rock/Cena feud. He needed the belt taken off of him ASAP.
Worst big match of the year - Triple H vs Undertaker II at Wrestlemania. While I didn't hate the match, to me it wasn't special outside of a few nice spots. Too much laying around for me.
Worst PPV match of the year - Wrestlemania
Most improved wrestler of the year - Dolph Ziggler. The man started the year as a solid wrestler and closes the year as a solid worker. He's stronger on the mic, even better in the ring, and knows how to work the crowd.
Diva of the year - It would almost have to be Kelly Kelly since they pushed her so hard over every other better Diva. I really can't comment on this. I want to say Beth or Natalya but they're booked like jokes.
Most consistently good in-ring performer of the year - Toss up between CM Punk and Dolph Ziggler.
Best angle of the year - Once again, Cena/Punk over the summer.


See I didn't know that about LeBell, and no, I don't know who he is, so the reference is lost on me.
And that's probably a problem for the character beyond just me - I'm sure a lot of people don't get the reference.
BUT, at least there is a reference, so at least now I understand that there's significance to the name.