AVEITWITHJAMON
Badass Cloud
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 41,416
- Reaction score
- 6,547
- Points
- 103
Yeah, this one just didn’t quite work for me I am afraid. I LOVED the Gorr run in the comics and thought it was all kinds of epic. I didn’t quite finish the Jane Foster run before seeing L&T but loved what I did read.
I thought combining the 2 was a good idea as there were some good story parallels. But for me Taika Waitit just wasn’t the guy for it. I thought Gorr was severely watered down which I expected to some extent, but not this much. Bale was great but felt a little wasted, and Gorr just didn’t feel the threat he did in the comics. I kinda wish they have saved Gorr and used Dario Agger or something instead for this.
Portman was game as Jane and her story was quite touching like the comics, but again they just didn’t go far enough with it for me and it felt the impact was missing.
A lot of the humour didn’t quite land for me either and Thor was just a bit too dude bro for me at times. Ragnarok just struck the balance so much better in that regard.
None of the action stood out at all either where as Ragnarok had a few outstanding sequences. I think the Gorr storyline and Jane Foster Thor storyline needed a more serious director who can balance humour and drama a bit better. I thought MoM was much better than this also despite having plenty of humour itself.
I think the cast definitely saved this movie as they were all great. Was great seeing eternity and omnipotence city also. But the movie should definitely have been longer.
Sad to say but 6.5/10 for me. Give me Ragnorak and the first Thor movie over L&T any day.
I thought combining the 2 was a good idea as there were some good story parallels. But for me Taika Waitit just wasn’t the guy for it. I thought Gorr was severely watered down which I expected to some extent, but not this much. Bale was great but felt a little wasted, and Gorr just didn’t feel the threat he did in the comics. I kinda wish they have saved Gorr and used Dario Agger or something instead for this.
Portman was game as Jane and her story was quite touching like the comics, but again they just didn’t go far enough with it for me and it felt the impact was missing.
A lot of the humour didn’t quite land for me either and Thor was just a bit too dude bro for me at times. Ragnarok just struck the balance so much better in that regard.
None of the action stood out at all either where as Ragnarok had a few outstanding sequences. I think the Gorr storyline and Jane Foster Thor storyline needed a more serious director who can balance humour and drama a bit better. I thought MoM was much better than this also despite having plenty of humour itself.
I think the cast definitely saved this movie as they were all great. Was great seeing eternity and omnipotence city also. But the movie should definitely have been longer.
Sad to say but 6.5/10 for me. Give me Ragnorak and the first Thor movie over L&T any day.