Well my first thought is that we'll just get reboots galore and any continuity between films will just die off. Everytime a franchise goes somewhat bad we'll just go right back to the beginning. Plus it might mean we'll just have the same stories told over and over again and no new material.
That's not what happened with Batman or the Hulk... I'd say your fears aren't demonstrably warranted just yet, man. Take it easy.
"
Why would anyone want less Spidey films in the short amount of time we have in this life? 
Waiting longer is both silly and a WASTE."
I take quality > quantity any day.
I never questioned that, you made it clear last time. I'd love quality too. The difference is, you're playing it like quality
requires less quantity, and that's not necessarily true. Spider-man 3 took plenty of time to come out, and look what happened. You're ignoring my point and pretending that I was talking about something else so you can rant about that something else that I never said,
again.
I'm not as extremist as you're painting me to be. I understand that some things take time, much as I understand that it takes time for me to type out this reply to you. It's common sense. However, time does not dictate quality, as your preaching would suggest.
For example, I could spend 10 minutes on this reply to you, and it could be marvelous. Alternatively I could spend
20 minutes replying to the same post and have it turn out completely crappy.
Anyway, moving on to things above a 3rd grade level.
Did I say you said quantity > quality or was that me saying what I prefer?
Both, actually. When I said what I said, you replied as though I were suggesting we sacrifice quality for quantity. See the first time I quoted you in this post - or better yet, see below, to your first reply to me.
So quantity > quality? You should look into the Twilight series.
Lets say we both live another 80 years. If you want 40 Spider-Man movies in that time, then go ahead and wish away. If you think pushing out as many Spider-Man films as they can is going to increase quality or keep the level of quality the same, then it was a rubbish retort.
Well! Thank goodness I don't think that!
Nor did I ever suggest that I did.
That isn't the way things work. In comparison with the Twilight films, the producers see how big of a fan base the books have and are pushing these movies out as fast as they can.
They are all coming out about 1 year apart from the previous. The next one is coming out in less than 1 year that the previous one came out.
So by making this comparison you're implying that this is what Sony's going to do with Spider-man, even though it's gonna be like a five year gap between Spidey 3 and the reboot?
Not only do you pretend people say things that they haven't, but you also have a really strange perspective on the passage of time, although that may be a side-effect of your apparent ability to
see into the future! 
I guess you are right. Writing a good script, scouting locations, pre-production, filming, post production, etc...don't have any sort of time frame in regards to quality.
When did I say that?
Let me note that I never said these films should come out as fast as you're saying that I'm saying they should.
Your future-seeing and mind-reading skills need some polishing, I say.
If you think the writer's strike caused a bunch of movies to speed up the process to get a script before the strike resulted in some great movies then I am full of it!
I never mentioned the writer's strike.
Time in your opinion isn't required in the process.
That was probably your most blatant attempt to put words in my mouth. Just quoting it as an example to prove that you're doing it.
I know the question wasn't directed at me, but i'm madly upset at Sony. They might actually surpass FOX as my most hated movie company. 
I about died! Thanks for lightening up my night. 
