I didn't say it saved the movie. I just said that it had good moments. It also had terrible moments. And as I was asked to compare that to TASM, I did. TASM has neither terrible moments or great moments. It is blandly mediocre from beginning to end. Take from that what you will.
TASM had great moments. What SM3 was good action. Great moments imply more than great CGI.
Great moments like Peter being heroic without having super-powers, or Spider-man saving that boy from the falling car. Great momnents are a thankful father understanding that this masked man is a hero. Also Uncle Ben being a proper fatherly figure.
Mediocre is having one-dimensional characters or achieving emotion just through music (death of Uncle Ben in SM1).
Garfield could portray the nerd but not the caricature Raimi concocted, the nerd that's shy, smart but not a social dead loss. Same with Uncle Ben, the good guy but also a proper fatherly figure in the case of ATSM, not someone who's unable to lecture his "son" if the boy gets mad.
But I do think the Birth of Sandman was impressive.
I agree.
I thought Harry's death, while the "crying" was questionable, was more impactful than Capt. Stacy or Uncle Ben's in TASM. And I still think no filmmaker has captured comic book mayhem better than Sam Raimi.
Not only can Maguire's face kick you out of any trace of drama that scene could have had, but also Harry's death was useless and avoidable. He died to save Peter because Peter couldn't get free. It turns out that immediately after he dies, Peter gets free.
Not even close to a great death scene.
And Uncle Ben's death scene had some drama in ATSM. Garfield did some great job there. Maguire barely dropped a few tears and left the scene.
Whedon finally outdid him because he had a bigger canvas, budget and five years of advancements in CGI. But other than The Avengers, I don't think any filmmaker has captured the dizzying madness of Marvel comics action like Raimi did in SM2 and SM3.
SM2, yes. But again, good action is being achieved by way too many directors to say that it is a sign of greatness.
Does it make it a good movie? No. But at least it has something I can compliment beyond initial casting decisions.
Again, I can mention the fast-paced and delirious initial action scene in Batman & Robin. It's worth of praising.
As for the end fight. I will just say that I thought it went downhill by the end (like the whole movie), but Peter and Harry teaming up was a very nice moment. One of the few in the movie, but it worked very well in my opinion.
They tried to blow each other's heads, then Bernard the butler does his deus ex machina and ta-dah, they become a perfect fighting duo, throwing jokes at each other. If that's the best it can offer, then it's a no from me.
At least Raimi's Uncle Ben could say with "Great Power Comes Great Responsibility."
Yeah, but when Peter talked back at him, he just lowered his head and refuse to teach the boy a necessary lesson.