Fresh Prince
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2008
- Messages
- 6,649
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Green Lantern, the Hobbit
WB has them 2? Wow!

Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Green Lantern, the Hobbit
WB has them 2? Wow!![]()
Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, Green Lantern, the Hobbit
If you man Gary Oldman's comments, I think the jury's still out. I'd like at least to hear from some writers or producers at least.well Batman 3 was announced. Looks like we're left out yet AGAIN.
jonax hex will be a big franchise ?And don't forget Jonah Hex.t: Well, the production has been finished recently, but still it counts.
Keeping my fingers crossed. I think GL has the most promise of being a huge tentpole for WB. Not as big as Bats but bigger than any other previous DC superhero film. Bigger than the X-dudes is my hope.
If you man Gary Oldman's comments, I think the jury's still out. I'd like at least to hear from some writers or producers at least.
The story was on the super hero hype homepage also so Oldman is right. Batman gonna start production next year with a movie out in 2011.
Not if Justin Timberlake plays GL.
Maybe WB is finally wising up. Bats 3 will be Nolan's last most likley. DC needs a new comic mega-franchise. GL comes out in 2011 also. WB is hopefully doing this to position GL as the next comic tentpole after Batman.
lmao2 weeks ago called me, they told me to tell you that Ryan Reynolds is playing Green Lantern.
There is still some little hope for a 2012-2013 release date
GL is set for 2011 and Bats 3,
2012 and 2013 sound defintely like Flash and Aqauman. So I think there is lots more than hope for DC projects in 2012 and 2013. Let not your heart be troubled.
GL is set for 2011 and Bats 3,
2012 and 2013 sound defintely like Flash and Aqauman. So I think there is lots more than hope for DC projects in 2012 and 2013. Let not your heart be troubled.
Remake, remake, unproven, Holiday movie and one sequel max.
Franchise, franchise, potential franchise, continuation of the Lord of the Rings franchise (and don't think that they aren't going to try and get the rights to Children of Hurin).
Warner Bros. is a film company with many franchises that go beyond just DC Comics. They have the Looney Tunes, Hanna-Barbera, Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, the film rights to Sex and the City, Final Destination, Rush Hour, Mortal Kombat, the Suffering, Happy Feet, Mad Max, Warcraft, the Adventures of Pluto Nash, Juwanna Man, etc.
It is still a franchise for Warner Bros. to exploit.Most of those are Halloween franchises that have been around for 30 years. Not mid July 300 million dollar franchises. There is clearly a difference.
Who are we to determine what's a summer or winter franchise?LOTR is a winter franchise as well. WoW may also be a winter franchise that will pick up after LOTR so the case is still out.
Yes, it's a small franchise, but a franchise nonetheless.Rush Hour? Hope you aren't talking about the Tucker/Chan movies.
I knowThe Murphy/Lawrence movies? Good joke there...![]()
Warner Bros. now owns Mortal Kombat after buying Midway Games. A franchise that they can exploit.Mortal Kombat?
Nothing is going to be the next Batman. The Dark Knight came out on the perfect date with the perfect hype with little competition.I am smelling the next Batman there... the rest are animated features. I was thinking live action. So none of those look like summer block busters by any stetch. As for GL, even if it was the next IM, that only covers them every 2-3 years. What about the sandwich years like 2009 and 2011 where WB had to adjust their slates to compensate to fill their slots? Again, maybe there is a franchise out there. What you listed I doubt will be one of them on par with what we are comparing them to.
There isn't any problem. I can wait.
Nevertheless I doubt that between Flash, Aquaman and GL there will be more than a movie able to make more than $150m at the box office.
Flash and Green Lantern both should easily top 200+ Mil. Ryan Reynold's Hal Jordan is going to become a blockbuster film icon. Flash is such a visually stimulating character that he will kill with the right director.
Aquaman will be harder, but if Leo does it (what better way to ensure your films success?) it will make bank as well.
but I doubt that GL and Flash can do better than Wolverine.
I'm sure alot off ppl wrote off Iron man also, since he is more a side hero to the front runenrs at marvel & look what happened there. A great comic book movie doesn't come from what Hero is the better hero, or what hero has the most fans, it comes down to quality of script, director & actor & I think GL has that & can be great.
Steve
It is still a franchise for Warner Bros. to exploit.
Who are we to determine what's a summer or winter franchise?
Yes, it's a small franchise, but a franchise nonetheless.
I know![]()
Warner Bros. now owns Mortal Kombat after buying Midway Games. A franchise that they can exploit.
Nothing is going to be the next Batman. The Dark Knight came out on the perfect date with the perfect hype with little competition.
And don't knock down animated features. Happy Feet was very successful and I personally don't get why Warner Bros. doesn't milk the Hanna-Barbera and Looney Tunes properties to the best potential. They can make some excellent animated films with them.
My point is that Warner Bros. really doesn't need Superman when they have a lot of other properties out there that can also be exploited just as much. They're not like Marvel Studios that is dedicated on bringing out adaptations and interpretations of their comic book characters like Iron Man, Hulk, and Thor. Warner Bros. has to be more diversified because they're a major studio.