WB/DC: It's All Part Of The Plan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why make a sequel to a movie that is 30yrs old? My 20yr old nephew and his friends went to see SR. All they knew about the original was that Reeves was Superman. And while they could figure most of the plot points out. They thought it was ridiculous to be a sequel and that she has a kid with him and doesn't know who he is.

Pardon my English,

Couldn't agree more. It was already a big mistake to continued where Superman II left, to assume that people had familiarized themselves with previous movies. Aside from fans, nobody would likely has seen or remember the event in Superman I and II.

When the big reveal of Jason being Superman's son, instead of enlightment for the audience, it created a big WTF moment for them.

Singer did a big mistake by solely approaching SR from a fan's point of view, by doing so he already alienated the majority of the audiences who didn't care about the continuity from the previous movies
 
Pardon my English,

Couldn't agree more. It was already a big mistake to continued where Superman II left, to assume that people had familiarized themselves with previous movies. Aside from fans, nobody would likely has seen or remember the event in Superman I and II.

When the big reveal of Jason being Superman's son, instead of enlightment for the audience, it created a big WTF moment for them.

Singer did a big mistake by solely approaching SR from a fan's point of view, by doing so he already alienated the majority of the audiences who didn't care about the continuity from the previous movies

I would say he ony approached it from HIS particular POV and not a fan's POV.
 
The beating of Superman in SR is Very hardcore gut wrenching, IMO. I just couldn't believe it when I first saw it in theaters. Very well done and effective. I really felt for Superman. Lex became a monster right there.

very hardcore indeed, but unnecessarily that violent for a Superman movie. Sure we didn't see blood and the stabbing was done off-screen, but still the way Lex punctuated every word ("learn to walk before you leap")with a kick to the stomach was too much. If i'm a parent, i would not allow my children to see it
 
The beating of Superman in SR is Very hardcore gut wrenching, IMO. I just couldn't believe it when I first saw it in theaters. Very well done and effective. I really felt for Superman. Lex became a monster right there.


:pal: :lmao: The beating of Superman, not from Lobo, not from "Me am SUPERMAN" Bizzaro, not from Mongul, not from Lord Darkseid but Lex, not even Ironman enhanced Lex, just plain old Lex, :csad: are you F'en kidding me? :huh:

I really felt for Superman fans, what a hand job, what a rip! You all should demand a refund!!!
 
very hardcore indeed, but unnecessarily that violent for a Superman movie. Sure we didn't see blood and the stabbing was done off-screen, but still the way Lex punctuated every word ("learn to walk before you leap")with a kick to the stomach was too much. If i'm a parent, i would not allow my children to see it


LMFAO.....and your child would be rebelling against you when?
 
Methinks someone's gonna get a warning.
 
True, and the only references he picked was Donner's movies

The space plane rescue was taken from Byrne's Man of Steel, the orbital listening post from Alex Ross. The plot to use Kryptonian technology to transform the Earth was borrowed from the Eradicator/Krypton Man. Elements of the costume were taken from the Fleischer cartoons.

Sure it's set in Donner's pre-Chris Nolan "Superhero in the real world" universe, but their are nods to other incarnations of the Man of Steel if you're paying attention.
 
personally, it didn't make me mad... just made me more disappointed that WB is still thinking of going with a sequel
 
I won't argue that SUPERMAN RETURNS was very much Bryan Singer's movie, based very much on where he would like to see the character go. But it just really cannot be argued that he did not include most, if not all, of the truly classic and unique elements of the basic Superman mythology, and he also made the movie a nod to the Donner film, which back then, fans were clamoring for. NOW fans aren't pleased with that approach, but back then they were screaming for it.

he was previous. but now he returns to be the hero to save the day. i believe there will be scenes we see him saving the people and the children from the danger. can't wait.

Trust me on this. The Hulk is not portrayed as a hero until the end of the movie. He's being hunted through the entire thing. He's still supposed to be scary. Even Banner is scared of him. And The Hulk is supposed to be, at it's best portrayals, a scary concept. The idea that a man can lose control like that is frightening.

btw, i'm tired of replying to your's previous comments, as we will never gonna be agree to each other regarding how bad/good SR is.

Ok...then don't reply to them. Quit wasting my time with "I'm not going to respond to you anymore" posts.

Foreign box office means something simply because Batman Begins ($150m of budget ) without its "poor" $166m made overseas would haven't been profitable.

This fact proves another time that, despite the hate of some fans, SR sold more tickets than BB.

Does it means anything?

IMO it means that with a limited budget and more action this franchise has a bright future. No reboot is needed.

Good point. A reboot may not be needed, but it seems to be wanted. Although there's no reason MAN OF STEEL has to stick to the Donnerverse.

SR was dull, quirky, sad and depressing...unlike BB, which was intense, thrilling, engaging, and exciting.

I think it was a bit sobering and serious, and that's what turned some people off it as a blockbuster. But "dull"? Maybe if you dislike certain kinds of drama...

Problem was, there was no visible emotional struggle with Superman to turn this into a true gut wrenching moment.

What in God's name are you talking about? He's sitting there writhing and screaming and struggling to break free, and struggling to keep going.

What did you freaking want?

And your structural complaints are absurd. The movie didn't just SPRING Luthor's revenge on Superman during the New Krypton sequence. It built this angle, via Luthor stealing and usurping Superman's technology, kidnapping his friends, and then threatening his city. And Superman's emotions built as well.

You saying that the movie didn't build up to this just doesn't make that the case. It was clearly structured and built to this point.

The beating of Superman in SR is Very hardcore gut wrenching, IMO. I just couldn't believe it when I first saw it in theaters. Very well done and effective. I really felt for Superman. Lex became a monster right there.

Agreed. I cannot for the life of me see how someone could not consider this an emotional scene. I'm curious to what he does consider an emotion scene.

Here's were the bad casting really came out, how believeable was it that Kevin Spacey was kicking anyones ass. Yes it was violent but even without powers he should be able to beat him up. Macaulay Culkin looks a hard man next to this Lex.

It was mostly Lex's henchman who beat Superman up, which is as it should be. Lex using others to do his dirty work until he's ready to deliver the killing blow. Lex delivered the final "blow", so to speak. Which again, is as it should be.

I agree I really like that scene it's hard to watch but IMO it's a good scene, one thing I felt Singer did well was show Lex's jealousy and hate towards
Superman.

Absolutely. Wasn't developed REAL well, but it was there.

Felt as in "ow that hurts" or "man, all hope is lost for him".

I think more felt the first than the later, there is a big difference.

You've got to be kidding me. The man was beaten within an inch of his life, stabbed with Kryptonite, which was then broken off inside him, and fell off a cliff into the water, where he was clearly as good as dead. And it's ow, that
hurts?"

I think some of the bias against this movie is seeping into the logic center of people's brains, because some of the assessments of these scenes are just becoming ridiculous.

Not once did I feel any emotion for Superman, they just gave him none. There was NO struggle with him at all besides that moment.

I'm just baffled at how you can come away from the movie with that mindset. Are you talking about Superman's emotional struggle BEFORE the scene? What kind of emotional struggle in regard to "Lex has taken my technology" should he have, in that case?

True, and the only references he picked was Donner's movies

Patently untrue. The suit itself bears little resemblance to Donner's movie, and more to both the classic design and Fleischer's Superman. There are obvious references to the comic books, both early, classic and modern. The story itself was clearly inspired by WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE MAN OF TOMORROW or RETURN TO KRYPTON stories, and you can see bits of THE DEATH OF SUPERMAN in the film. Add to that all the comic book references, Superman soaking up the sun, Bibbo, etc.

How the hell can Kal-El get stab with Kryptonite, broken off inside him for crying out loud, a very large chunk at that and he does not even die. WTF?

The same way he doesn't always die right away when poisoned with Kryptonite in the comics, cartoon or SMALLVILLE. Because Kryptonite doesn't have any definitive "time of death" to it. What, do you want the hero to die?

Just a particle of kryptonite can seriously do damage to Big Blue. Yet, he's not even poisoned by the radiation of the Kryptonite inserted inside him.

it just me, or did that scene look like man on man action? Wen stabbing little boy blue, Lex looked like he was giving Singerman a back shot, broke back style, more like a rape scene IMHO

It's definitely just you. And some scary, scary issues.
 
personally, it didn't make me mad... just made me more disappointed that WB is still thinking of going with a sequel

IMO they are doing the right thing, and I explain you the reason :)

SR was released in 2006, and it did $391m ww. It wasn't a superblockbuster, but it was one of the most successful movies of the year.
Despite this they crearly expected more and a lot of fans (even if still a minority) didn't like it.
The main reasons why the movie wasn't a huge seccess were the lack of actions and the tone too serious and romantic for a summer movie.
Despite all the negative things and the great budget the movie was profitable and the majority of people liked it (you can go everywhere from amazon to yahoo and the worst average is "B").
So we are in 2008, and we know for certain that the sequel will not happen in 2009. If they want to do it, they have to release it in 2010, they can't wait anymore, expecially if they want to use Superman in a JLA movie. A reboot by now would ask too much time to be organized (a new actor, new costume, new writers, new script, new crew etc.) and it would not guarantee a better box office performance.

A good sequel, with a new writers and a good script is the better choice.
Is Singer the right man to direct it? IMO for the WB it is irrilevant, but I'm for a "yes". Singer proved to be the right man for a sequel, infact his X2 was terrific.

A sequel would have zero risks for the WB.
Even if a disappointment the MOS will not be a flop. The fans will go to see it.
The MOS is a sure financial bet, while Speedracer, for example, is not.
At the end of the games if the sequel will be successful enough (500m ww) they can continue to use this franchise, in the case of a disappointment, they can still reboot Superman in 3-5-10 years.
The haters ask for a reboot, but if the reboot was a failure what should they do? Another reboot? LOL 12 reboots in a decade.
 
Please :whatever:! Let us look at it through the eyes of the director.
Perhaps he had a fantasy growing up when playing Superman as a boy, and while play fighting with his young mate as Lex, the battle turned into a romantic encounter.
Which years later inspired him to reenacted it in his film minus the romantic part, just the facial expressions under the guise of back stabbing.

So, the train's gone around the track and we're back again in Homophobia-ville. Ugh.
 
IMO they are doing the right thing, and I explain you the reason :)

SR was released in 2006, and it did $391m ww. It wasn't a superblockbuster, but it was one of the most successful movies of the year.
Despite this they crearly expected more and a lot of fans (even if still a minority) didn't like it.
The main reasons why the movie wasn't a huge seccess were the lack of actions and the tone too serious and romantic for a summer movie.
Despite all the negative things and the great budget the movie was profitable and the majority of people liked it (you can go everywhere from amazon to yahoo and the worst average is "B").
So we are in 2008, and we know for certain that the sequel will not happen in 2009. If they want to do it, they have to release it in 2010, they can't wait anymore, expecially if they want to use Superman in a JLA movie. A reboot by now would ask too much time to be organized (a new actor, new costume, new writers, new script, new crew etc.) and it would not guarantee a better box office performance.

A good sequel, with a new writers and a good script is the better choice.
Is Singer the right man to direct it? IMO for the WB it is irrilevant, but I'm for a "yes". Singer proved to be the right man for a sequel, infact his X2 was terrific.

A sequel would have zero risks for the WB.
Even if a disappointment the MOS will not be a flop. The fans will go to see it.
The MOS is a sure financial bet, while Speedracer, for example, is not.
At the end of the games if the sequel will be successful enough (500m ww) they can continue to use this franchise, in the case of a disappointment, they can still reboot Superman in 3-5-10 years.
The haters ask for a reboot, but if the reboot was a failure what should they do? Another reboot? LOL 12 reboots in a decade.
you can say that all you want, ita, but I'm never going to agree with you.

WB should just let it gather dust for another decade, IMO... this franchise doesn't deserve another movie until someone can come along and give it the proper attention it deserves.
 
you can say that all you want, ita, but I'm never going to agree with you.

WB should just let it gather dust for another decade, IMO... this franchise doesn't deserve another movie until someone can come along and give it the proper attention it deserves.

Amen Brother! Preach it! :bow:
 
According to you he have died before from Kryptonite

What?

Kryptonite have had put him in a comma like state but he never died.

Which brings up...CAN Superman die? The "solar battery" theory suggests he cannot actually die, at least as humans perceive it.

What SR did he should have died.

He did pretty much die from New Krypton. And he was incredibly close to death when Lois found him.
 

Never mind.



Which brings up...CAN Superman die? The "solar battery" theory suggests he cannot actually die, at least as humans perceive it.
Ok, I'll take your word on it.


He did pretty much die from New Krypton. And he was incredibly close to death when Lois found him.

Sorry I missed that part, he just seemed extremely exhausted to me, which required a Red Bull dose of sun light to make it all better.
 
Sorry I missed that part, he just seemed extremely exhausted to me, which required a Red Bull dose of sun light to make it all better.

This is after Lois pulled the Kryptonite out of him. I'm talking about when he fell into the ocean with the Kryptonite still in him. He was as good as dead.
 
This is after Lois pulled the Kryptonite out of him. I'm talking about when he fell into the ocean with the Kryptonite still in him. He was as good as dead.

:hehe: Actually I know, would have been better if Aquaman have had saved him instead. :dry:
 
Billy Bastons post is the reason why I'm oftened disappointed in my fellow SR dislikers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"