Ronny Shade said:
I've been a Burton-hater for a long time. Most of you know this about me. But lately, I had a revelation. I watched Batman Begins and realized ....It's not perfect either. True Nolan did a better job than Burton did, but that doesn't mean Nolan's vision is perfection. Burton changed things from the comic, but he also kept a lot of things that Nolan didn't....the "look" of the Burton films is inherantly cartoony and fantastical (as are all Burton films) but...Things are inevitably that way in the comic as well. Things are larger than life...somewhat artificial and overly iconic as opposed to realistic in comics. Nolan changed that (as well as some story aspects, some character aspects, heck, Nolan changed a lot). I don't fault Nolan for diverging from the comics, because i think to a certain extent some of that stuff doesn't work well on screen. It's entirely possible....even probable that if we ever do get another "reboot" on the Batman film franchise, that it's even better than this franchise.
Though I doubt anyone'll ever top Bale.
Yes, I'll agree with you, Nolan didn't make perfect movie, but he made one of the best superhero movies at nowadays IMO.
In vissual style, honestly, I can't say one of them was better than another. In Burton's movies, there was great, but also too gothic vissual style.
In BB, there was also amazing vision (especially on Gotham), but it was too realistic.
So I loved them both, but their visions had also negative aspects.
Nolan changed a lot, because he didn't want to make just a requel to Burton's movies. He was very faithful to comics.
And even if he didn't read so much, he had known this and that is why he had asked Goyer for writting the script.
What about cast, in this case, BB had greater actors than B89 or BR.
But still, both visions were great.
I hope next time, we will really have director, who has compined vision of both Burton's and Nolan's. But he also can have his own.