• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Thursday Aug 14, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST. This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

The Avengers What villain do you want in the Avengers movie?

What villain would you want the Avengers take on?

  • Loki

  • Red Skull

  • Ultron

  • Kang

  • Thanos

  • Korvac

  • Masters of Evil

  • Skrulls

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
Sorry, I just got out of work, so me brain no worky goodly.
 
I'd like to see, the Leader, working with (assuming he's in IM2 as rumored) Justin Hammer, at Hammer Industries,(or one of his other enemies) in the creation of iron armored hulk like creations

When was this reported???

Anyhow... my ideal Masters of Evil team... Baron Zemo, Leader, Count Nefaria, Loki. Mostly new blood other than Loki... new kinds of threats. Potential to be more formidable than the Avengers themselves if used right. As far as Red Skull and Mandarin.... they really should stay in the solo franchises. I'd say the same for Leader but Hulk may not get sequels and Loki makes sense to begin with because he was the first Avenger villain.
 
About a hundred times? Rockwell himself has confirmed he's playing Hammer.....
 
I thought he had Leader in IM2... then I went to the IM thread and saw no such report... so I asked...
 
While Ultron is my favorite villain to team up against the avengers, I think he should be saved for a sequel. Maybe introduce Ultron-1 in the first movie. Help us get a sense of Pyms character as well as delve into the "innocent machine turns evil" concept.
 
Abomination Loki Ultron and Iron Monger would be a good combination of villains
 
Abomination Loki Ultron and Iron Monger would be a good combination of villains

except iron monger's dead
so unless they retrieve and fix his armor, then get someone else to pilot it, ...
i'm sure he'll get another ironmonger/bigger meaner version of ironman in the sequel.
 
While Ultron is my favorite villain to team up against the avengers, I think he should be saved for a sequel. Maybe introduce Ultron-1 in the first movie. Help us get a sense of Pyms character as well as delve into the "innocent machine turns evil" concept.

double agree, ultron's too badass to be shoved thru the first film.
It's like people who wanted venom in sm3, i wanted him to be left in the very end, like he's covered in the symbiote, so at least there would be build-up .. you just cant rush things like these.
 
I would really like to see Red Skull with AIM behind him. Skull is a ex-Nazi in hiding out in South America. Along with AIM scientists, he has assembled a state of the art mecrenary army, making millions off of the seemingly never-ending revolutions and drug wars in South America.

The Cosmic Cube comes into play, and the Skull steals a move from Count Nefaria's play-book... in taking Washington DC hostage. Between the Cube and some high-tech weapons that could knock Hulk and Thor for a loop, and some supporting villains like Crossbones, this could be a major story. The assault on DC could even be the final piece that finally draws the team together.
 
I think that the first villain in The Avengers movie should be the Hulk, as in the comics and animated movies Ultimate Avengers

18.jpg


And in the sequel should be the main villain Chitauri Nazi Herr Kleiser and also briefly introduce the character Black Panther, as in the movie Ultimate Avengers 2

01.jpg


Bye
 
chitari is just a stand in for skrulls, and klieser is just a stand in for the red skull, so no. plus WE'VE ALREADY SEEN THOSE MOVIES!!!! we don't need to see them again.
 
For the first movie, Marvel should start off easy by letting the audience get to know the Avengers and their formation and interactions. Their first threat should be the Hulk (much like the first volume of the Ultimates, but with 616 characterizations). From there, they should do Ultron in a sequel and possible the Skrulls if the the movies become a trilogy.

The masters of evil might be too big for a standard movie. I mean, that'd be at least 12 different characters fighting on screen (Avengers + MoE). I just think it'd be too difficult to pull off for the writers and from a budget standpoint.
 
Ultron! maybe the Skrulls, but you have to hint it, or start the storyline, in the other Marvel movies.

God, I didn't know we had Avengers board. I'm home!
 
Actually I honestly think you could get Dr. Doom and the Masters of Evil. Ignore FF continuity and reintroduce him. (shrug)
 
Ultron

RedSkull

Baron Zemo

Baron Von Strucker

H.Y.D.R.A / Madame Hydra

Loki

A.I.M.

one or two of these guys.
 
buy it back then use him Doom isn't going anywhere currently


Doom would be awesome to see in his full potential, I'd admit, but if that's not going to happen, and I'm guessing it won't, I want Kang.

Red Skull is Captain America's, Loki is Thor's and Ultron should be an Antman villain, because Antman's villains are mostly lame.

Kang is the originality that would be begged for for the film.
 
Last edited:
Doom would be awesome to see in his full potential, I'd admit, but if that's not going to happen, and I'm guessing it won't, I want Kang.

Red Skull is Captain America's, Loki is Thor's and Ultron should be an Antman villain, because Antman's villains are mostly lame.

Kang is the originality that would be begged for for the film.
but think of all the time travel explination time we save by using anyone other than kang...
 
but think of all the time travel explination time we save by using anyone other than kang...

It can be simple if you're not trying extensively to sympathize with the villain. He could show up, say "I'm am a lord of time travel, coming here to rule eternity!" fight, Avengers fail, then fight again, Avengers win. Boom. Done.
 
It can be simple if you're not trying extensively to sympathize with the villain. He could show up, say "I'm am a lord of time travel, coming here to rule eternity!" fight, Avengers fail, then fight again, Avengers win. Boom. Done.
but that's boring...i want the villian to have a somewhat understandable/relatable goal. the movies work best imo when you can understand the villians motives and could possibly be swayed to agree with them
 
but that's boring...i want the villian to have a somewhat understandable/relatable goal. the movies work best imo when you can understand the villians motives and could possibly be swayed to agree with them

That is an opinion.

It can be great to have a sympathizable villain, sometimes. However, they can't all be like that, I can name several instances where the villain is much scarier because he just does terrible things, rather than trying to understand him. Sometimes it ruins the moment. Not disagreeing, just stating how it could work.
 
That is an opinion.

It can be great to have a sympathizable villain, sometimes. However, they can't all be like that, I can name several instances where the villain is much scarier because he just does terrible things, rather than trying to understand him. Sometimes it ruins the moment. Not disagreeing, just stating how it could work.
no, i get you:cwink:

i dunno, i'd just really rather as much time as possible be spent on the heroes and their relationships with each other. that's why i want the loki/hulk thing, both are established and you should be able to tell where they're coming from thanks to previous films so you don't have to spend alot of time devolping them but they're still more than just the guy with lasers blowing up the city
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"