Thats doesnt mean he didnt want to kill him
What was the purpose of visiting the school then,just toss him around and give him bruises?
He says something along the lines of 'You are not get in my way of plan,Peter Parker' when he is arguing with his split personality in the sewers before the School fight.What does that tell ya?
What does lines like 'You stopped me once,you wont stop me again' tell ya?
But yet Lizard DIDN'T kill Spidey, so saying he wanted to kill him really means nothing when he
didn't
No,its actually because I think it doesnt make sense to cut a scene at that point and then show the Lizard entering the street.
All that I'm saying is that it just makes much more sense than how the cut is with the theatrical cut. I am fine with us thinking Lizard eats Dr. Ratha and appears again on the street without bothering to kill Spidey.
Making excuses to say there was an additional gory scene of Lizard actually eating Dr. Ratha is only trying to help some point that the censor boards wanted the scene out.
It makes more sense than the theatrical cut but still doesnt make enough sense
I mean,does he just leave Peter lying there? Makes no sense.And then what? We see Spidey on the street calling Gwen on the Phone?
The bold is all you could've said from the get go, lol.
Lizard leaves Spidey lying there inside that library, so sure, why not just leave Spidey on the floor while Lizard moves on to bigger and better things?
They are plenty of times directors do alternate scenes and decide later what to put in the theatrical cut.
Iron Man and Iron Man 2 have alternate scenes and the movie looked better with what was shown than what wasnt.Raimi calculated it wrong
Those "plenty of times" are usually with films that have alternate scenes that makes more sense than what we've seen in the last two Spider-Man films.
And how can you say the alternate scene were better when no one has seen those alternate cuts in the first place? Maybe they were worse?
You can find out the deleted/alternate scenes anywhere as it's even been discussed many times, and to death, on the Spidey boards for Spider-Man 3. Those scenes are mentioned in the novelization of the film and were filmed and they were very much better than what we got in S-M 3.
FFS every movie has deleted/alternate scenes,learn that concept first.Its nothing new with TASM
Once again,what makes you think the alternate scenes in SM3 would have been better?
And before blaming Arad about TASM's sewer scene? Try to think about the logic behind it FFS
What would he stand to gain for removing the 3 minute scene?
Didn't know I said anything about not knowing that many films out there have had alternate scenes.
And while I already talked about S-M 3's other scenes, for the TAS-M question...hrm, let me guess...perhaps Arad wanted to shave time off? Perhaps it had something to do with Peter's other origin that the producers didn't seem to care about? "FFS", you should think for a moment besides trying to act like buddies-buddies with Avi Arad.
And I dont buy the trend of blaming Arad for everything wrong in Spider-man films
Great, you're the only one.
By wiser you mean blaming someone for something without any logic and source?
"Logic" such as blaming it on the censor boards
It had a ****** script and Arad was responsible for that too,go on say it
Well the script was fine, but it didn't seem like it when all the more important scenes were taken out.
If Webb really felt he wasn't in control or Avi was giving him a tough time, he wouldn't be directing TASM2.
A job is a job.
Me neither but many people keep posting "Oh, the sequel should be like The Dark Knight" and I can't stand it you know? The Dark Knight is not the only good sequel to be compared with upcoming sequels..
But The Dark Knight is the last great sequel we've seen and that's why everyone says the sequel can pull a TDK. It's a fair comparison; not bringing up anything Nolan-related but that TDK was the last great CBM sequel.