What's The Last Movie You Watched? XIV - - Part 15

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blown Away

Dissapointing in the cheesy action movie department, considering director Stephen Hopkins also made Predator 2, but Tommy Lee Jones' trolling is glorious.
 
HighPlainsDrifter1973.jpg
MV5BMTUwMjcxNTM0OF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODY1MTkxMQ@@._V1._SY317_CR5,0,214,317_.jpg


High Plains Drifter (1973)

Classic Eastwood frakking bad ass western flick. The badassness of this flick is actually far beyond the sun.

Eastwood paints the whole frakking town red to meet the bad guys. When the villians ride in to the all red town, they are met with signs that says: "Hell", and "Welcome Home", in red of course. You young snots prolly wont be impressed with that, but that's OK. You're forgiven.

I never get tired of this flick.
 
Last edited:
Total Recall remake (complete garbage)

Diary Of A Wimpy Kid Dog Days (funny)
 
The Philly Kid

Crap. I'm over these MMA films completely. Warrior did it awesome, Never Back Down 2 was horrible and this was even worse. I haven't seen such a silly waste of Michael Jai White since The Dark Knight (Yes, the fact that he didn't fight Batman will annoy me until the end of time). Who, consequently was the only guy in this (All one minute of his screen time) that wasn't a block of wood. Actually, the villain of the film was hammy enough, but he didn't do much. I will give this movie some credit, the female lead didn't have a face that looked more plastic than Henry Silva's, it's a rarity to see someone normal looking. Also, Kris Van Varenburg getting killed is always nice to see.
 
Hugo
The Hurt Locker
 
Brokeback Mountain

Wow.
 
Superman VS. The Elite.

Picked up a little towards the end but it's probably my least favourite DCAU movie.

ALSO: Whoever cast Manchester Black should be fired immediately!
 
I looove how naive my little brother is. Yesterday I saw "The Dark Knight Rises" with him in theater. He asked me if they really built "The Bat" for the film, because he couldnt believe it was just an animation.

Later he asked me if Gotham City really exists.
 
The Rocky Horror Picture Show

102032-rocky_horror_poster_2.jpg


7.5/10

Decided to do a Rocky Horror/Little Shop double feature one night and while Rocky Horrors production values are pretty low budget B movie that's part of the charm. The film seems to be a perverse musical nod to the cult classic horror and B movies from the 30's to the 60's.

The cleverness of the musical numbers is where the film really shines. Tim Curry is a bizarrely hilarious spectacle to behold in this movie. I totally forgot Charles Gray was in this.



Little Shop of Horrors

littleshop86.jpg


7.5/10

On the technical level is where this film really impresses most but its still very funny and enjoyable. The "outdoor" street sets look like just that--sets--but for some reason it works. Maybe because the film was partly based on a stage musical (which was itself based on Cormans original 60's films). I just love the retro/60's look throughout the film. Like Rocky Horror its also a kind of nod to B movie horror of a bygone era. The opening crawl seems like something out of a 50's B movie.

The Audrey II puppet really does come to life thanks to a combination of great puppeteering work (from creation to control) and the voice work of Levi Stubbs. The guys voice work gave me a good laugh because it gave Audrey II so much character that wouldn't have been there with another voice actor.

The entire cast turns in great work. Rick Moranis is very believable in his role but its Steve Martin and Bill Murray that give the craziest performances.
I think LSoH is probably one of Frank Oz's most fun films.



Enemy Mine

600full-enemy-mine-poster.jpg


7.5/10

LOVED this film as a kid and it still holds up. There's a great message of gaining mutual respect and learning to work together and peace through understanding. Its funny how much this movie reminds me of the later made episode of Star Trek TNG called "Darmok." They aren't exactly the same but there are a few similarities. I guess its an age old story thats been recycled the way The Most Dangerous Game has been.

I think Enemy Mine has some of Dennis Quaids best work from the 80's. He makes for a great genre hero. Davidge has a realistic arc but he provides some of the films best humor as he and Jerry first begin to learn about each other. Special credit has to go to Lou Gossett Jr as Jerry the Drac. He shows what a true actor can do with a role like this. He doesn't just play it as some guy in a suit. His voice and mannerisms sell Jerry as what he is: a being from another race. Both their characters run the gamut of emotions as tensions rise and fall during their fight just to survive the harsh conditions of the planet.

The film has a really interesting retro sci fi feel in places while at the same time having an unmistakable 80's feel. I've always enjoyed the kinds of locations Wolfgang Peterson can come up with (either on sets or locations) and how he shoots them. The alien planet Davidge and "Jerry" crash land on.

I think the film could have gained from being a little longer. Once we get to the last third of the film the evil miners/scavengers part of the story feels a little cliche and rushed but its still solid. I've always felt this movie has been overlooked and under-appreciated over the years but its a pretty cool sci fi adventure from its time. Its the moral of the film that makes it stand out.
 
Last edited:
The Innocents
the-innocents.jpg

Horror from -61 in which a guverness arrives to a mansion to take care of two children whos parents have died (I think that was why). First strange things start to happen around the building and then the children starts to act weird, which makes her certain of that some evil force is around. Or is it just in her own mind?

I thought it was OK. A little difficult to follow just what the guverness' theory was which made the secnd half a little frustrating to follow, but I would still recomend it for a rainy night of horror flicks!

It also get +1 for Deborah Kerr who is very beautiful in this!


4/6
 
Last edited:
poster-3-iron.jpg


10/10

I love this movie. A really loving story that uses some magical realism to really make it something unusually enjoyable.
 
Total Recall (2012)

total_recall_movie_poster_2.jpg


6.5/10...maybe 7/10

Eh...it was ok. I wasn't hugely impressed with it but it was an entertaining way to waste an afternoon. But its something I can see myself not thinking about much again. This could have easily been a rental.

The SCOPE of the film was impressive mostly thanks to what CGI allows for these days. The "world" looks big and there's this grand expanse of futuristic cityscape that all the action covers but it lacked the "character" of the Verhoeven movie. That had a lot of stylistic flare that just isn't in the Wiseman film which looks like a cross between Minority Report and the new Dredd. Its one thing that's disappointing me with today's futuristic sci fi action films: most have this same sterile look to them.

There's a good cast here but most of them don't have a chance to do anything particularly impressive acting wise. I think Beckinsale outshines Biel if only because her role is a more "fun" one as the bad girl. Bryan Cranston is a hell of an actor but here Cohagen is just your typical evil politician. They also try to make him more of a fighter which I didn't really buy. Bill Nighy is also a hell of an actor but he get even LESS to do. His part is so small he doesn't make much of an impression. Farrell is serviceable but its not a role that's much of a stretch for anyone. He lacks Arnolds charm.

The one thing I DID like about this film more is that Quaid is more of a regular guy that can blend in than he was in the 1990 film. Arnold Schwarzenegger was anything but. It was his charisma that made him work in that movie. Here Quaid works his ****** job on an assembly line and could just be any guy.

The basics of the story stick pretty close to the 1990 film until the last third. The kind of lame part is it TRIES to use your memories of the original to play tricks on you a few times. It also tries to make you question whether or not its all real or just rekall like in the original film but it doesn't do it nearly as strongly.



H.G. Wells' Things To Come

things-to-come-movie-poster-1936-1020197216.jpg


7.5/10

Seen it before but got it on dvd yesterday. Tried to watch the colorized version first and...yeah...f*** that. Its hideous. I usually stay away from colorized versions of black and white films but I was curious. I was a little impressed with the most recent and best color version of Night of The Living Dead. Ray Harryhausen suggested this for Things To Come. I love ya Ray since you are a geek legend/god but...for shame, sir. I turned it off and watched the good ol' B&W instead.

The film starts with the world on the brink of war in the 30's and ends 100 years later with mankind ready to take the next step in our growth as an advanced technological society.

The story can really slow down at times and that lack of a strong pace is where the film suffers but its still damn impressive. The scope and scale of Things To Comes story is impressive as hell..especially for a film made in 1936. The world war scenes look good but the scenes set in crumbling cities of the future and advanced futuristic cities farther in the future look even better.

Like I said more than anything I have to take my hat off for the filmmakers because of the technical achievements making this film at the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"