K
Kane
Guest
Humanity VS Superman. I could see that...something along the lines of JLU season 2, it would also be the perfect way to introduce Cadmus and bring about Bizzaro or Doomsday.
What was the point of that?Crisis Superman said:Ditto.
have it.
Ditto again.
Spike_x1 said:What was the point of that?![]()
Spike_x1 said:I listed them to show that there have been numerous interpretations of Metallo's origin in the past, and that scripting a new origin isn't exactly unfamiliar territory.
You never stated that or anything like that.Crisis Superman said:I listed them to show I was aware of those origins and theyre totally irrelavant to the point.
What law says that he can't he have two different visions of Metallo?I never refered to them, I only referred to Singer being forced to develop 2 different visions for the character (assuming the Metallo represented in the SR video game is from his vision of the character).
Cinemaman said:I think Zod should have only cameo or 5 minutes at the beginning of SR2.
Threshold said:What about that whole Suicide Squad thing that was in the comics a couple of years ago. I could see Singer doing something similar to that in the next film. What ever opposition Superman goes up against, it'll be one that tests him physically, mentally, and emotionally. That's something you can always guarantee when dealing with a Bryan Singer film. Thank goodness!![]()
DarKush said:In response to Overlord,
I like Doomsday because he is walking destruction. When he was introduced he couldn't be bargained with, talked to. He had no known weaknesses, no attachments. He pushed Superman to the limits like none of his other villians had. And in the end he killed Superman. Something no other villian had done at the time...to my knowledge. (I might be wrong on that point. If so I apologize in advance).
I think the Kryptonian origin should be kept. Even though the Cadmus tie would be cool too. It would also make sense that Cadmus and Luthor are developing contingency plans for Supes. But if they go that route please make him better than Nuclear Man.
The Overlord said:I always thought Superman being killed by some unthinking plot device was lame, why couldn't an established villain do it, Mongul would havbe been better, he at least had a history with Supes. Frankly I would be happy if we never see that walking plot device on the silver screen, give some screen time with characters that have depth.
DarKush said:I love Doomsday, so we'll just have to agree to disagree. I think he is a more striking figure, and is a better visual than Mongul. I like the fact that he is fueled by rage, is pretty much unthinking, a killing machine. It's something Superman isn't used to facing.
The Superman/Doomsday fight itself could be a character defining moment for Doomsday, with no cool or witty or forced dialogue. We would figure out what he's all about in how he fights. It could be a ballet of destruction.
If done correctly, hopefully with better, more realistic CGI than in the Hulk movie, Doomsday would be a pretty awesome sight to see on the big screen in my eyes.
Mongul is okay, but he'll be another "I want to conquer the galaxy" type. I would rather see Darkseid than Mongul in a Superman movie. Maybe Mongul could be teaming up with someone, but not the main show.