Sequels Who should be the villain in an Avengers sequel? (Poll)

[The Overlord]

Who should be the villain in an Avengers sequel?

 

[Ultra Lantern]

Thanos

 

[BigThor]

I say Ultron for Avengers 2, I think Thanos should be saved for Avengers 3.

 

[Duke]

Ultron is the next logical choice for an Avenger's sequel. He's a excellent adversary for them.

 

[BigThor]

Ultron is the next logical choice for an Avenger's sequel. He's a excellent adversary for them.

Hell yeah, that's who I voted for.

 

[Hypestyle]

The epilogue to the Avengers should feature Parker Robbins finding a red cloak, perhaps a discarded object from Odin's throne room, stolen by Loki.. and so..

 

[dru-zod2501]

I could support Ultron, only if they introduce Hank Pym in some capacity beforehand. No Pym, no Ultron. If not I choose Kang

 

[BigThor]

I could support Ultron, only if they introduce Hank Pym in some capacity beforehand. No Pym, no Ultron. If not I choose Kang

Agreed, Ultron and the Pym's are "must haves" for Avengers 2 in my opinion.

 

[Slushy]

Nobody, but Thanos!

 

[ripse]

Kang The Conqueror, Master Combat & Tactics in Time Travel...must be hard avengers villain

 

[KangConquers]

Kang!

I think a movie with Kang would give Pym a reason to create Ultron (think of Earth's Mightiest Heroes where he sent an army of Ultron's to help with the Kang invasion.) Ultron requires much more build up than Kang, and should get part of a film to be built upto before he's unleashed.

 

[BigThor]

I'd still rather see Ultron than Kang, because we already know Thanos is going to eventually be a main villain and Ultron is a nice contrast to him.

 

[Icarus]

If they introduce Hank pym/Ant man in the sequel then they should have him build Ultron

 

[Kirk Langstrom]

I could support Ultron, only if they introduce Hank Pym in some capacity beforehand. No Pym, no Ultron. If not I choose Kang

Same here!

 

[CaptainJustin97]

Either Kang the Conqueror, Thanos or Ultron.

 

[BigThor]

^^^ Agreed

 

[Pink Ranger]

I'd like to see Hank and Janet, don't get me wrong, but technically we don't need them to introduce Ultron. There's enough irresponsible science going on between Stark, Banner and SHIELD to account for Ultron's creation.

 

[WhiteScorpio]

we already know Thanos is going to eventually be a main villain

We do? I don't.

I would prefer Kang for Avengers 2, Ultron for Avengers 3 and Thanos for Captain Marvel.

 

[BigThor]

We do? I don't.

I would prefer Kang for Avengers 2, Ultron for Avengers 3 and Thanos for Captain Marvel.

Yeah Loki's going to make a deal with him in The Avengers and he's going to be the one to supply Loki with an army.

 

[WhiteScorpio]

Yeah Loki's going to make a deal with him in The Avengers and he's going to be the one to supply Loki with an army.

I missed that. Can I have a link?

 

[marcvader]

I'd have Thanos for Avengers 2 if there is any hint of involvement in Avengers 1. I'd introduce the Pyms and the construction of Ultron in Avengers 2 and make him the villain in Avengers 3.

 

[BigThor]

You'd have Thanos come before Ultron? That doesn't seem like a "step down" to you?

 

[DOOZlovesBOOZ]

i would like Ultron for avengers 2 with pyms, no pyms no ultron for me. maybe easter egg for thanos to keep his threat known. then thanos for avengers 3.

I wouldn't be upset with kang, i just think that the budget to make that movie look good would be ridiculous. who knows tho, by time they make the avengers sequel Marvel Studios might be making bank from all these products. Not that they aren't now, but they are still fairly new.

Plus instead of using their profit on that kind of movie budget, id rather see them fork out the bucks and try to buy back the rights to characters.

 

[BigThor]

i would like Ultron for avengers 2 with pyms, no pyms no ultron for me. maybe easter egg for thanos to keep his threat known. then thanos for avengers 3.

I agree with this route

I wouldn't be upset with kang, i just think that the budget to make that movie look good would be ridiculous. who knows tho, by time they make the avengers sequel Marvel Studios might be making bank from all these products. Not that they aren't now, but they are still fairly new.

Plus instead of using their profit on that kind of movie budget, id rather see them fork out the bucks and try to buy back the rights to characters.

I don't see why Kang being the villain would make the budget higher than Thanos being the villain, I mean Thanos is one of the biggest threats in the MU.

 

[marcvader]

You'd have Thanos come before Ultron? That doesn't seem like a "step down" to you?

Not necessarily. The thing is I want the Pyms set up prior to Ultron. I also think Ultron taking over all of the worlds computer systems and elecronics giving him access to the worlds defenses and infrastructure is huge therefor on par with Thanos. So to answer your question, I don't feel he's a step down. I would also love to see Kang too but I'd leave him for a forth installment.