Sequels Who should be the villain in an Avengers sequel? (Poll)

[Pink Ranger]

I don't see why Kang being the villain would make the budget higher than Thanos being the villain, I mean Thanos is one of the biggest threats in the MU.

One of the difficulties of Kang is that his powers and his MO are somewhat more abstract, since they involve time travel. Whereas Thanos can be, if needed, simplified into an invading alien warlord.

 

[BigThor]

Not necessarily. The thing is I want the Pyms set up prior to Ultron. I also think Ultron taking over all of the worlds computer systems and elecronics giving him access to the worlds defenses and infrastructure is huge therefor on par with Thanos. So to answer your question, I don't feel he's a step down. I would also love to see Kang too but I'd leave him for a forth installment.

I see what you're saying, but personally I think just any non cosmic villain is a "step down" from Thanos.

 

[Steampunk Ghost]

now, see, i think that the Red Skull would make a better villain for a second Avengers movie. before you laugh, think about it. in Thor, when Loki falls into the starry abyss, he survives and comes back. i dont think that the Skull is dead at all. he's just trapped in the abyss, like Loki was, and will eventually return. he'd make a great villain for the Avengers, though. at this point in time, he'd be a global terrorist, which fits him pretty well. in a way, he was a terrorist in The First Avenger. he wasnt loyal to any single nation, but only to his own ambitions. does this make sense to you all?? or am i talking out my ass...??

 

[BigThor]

One of the difficulties of Kang is that his powers and his MO are somewhat more abstract, since they involve time travel. Whereas Thanos can be, if needed, simplified into an invading alien warlord.

That's true but Thanos isn't just any alien invader, he's one of the biggest threats in the Marvel Universe and he's probably going to have the Infinity Gauntlet with some if not all of the Infinity Gems.

 

[RetrogradeOrbit]

Ultron should be the villain in the sequel. We should also have the Vision introduced as a team member.

 

[BigThor]

Ultron should be the villain in the sequel. We should also have the Vision introduced as a team member.

I agree 100% t:

 

[MarvelKnight]

Ultron is the obvious choice, but if they can't get Pym routed in some form to present day then I agree he should not be used.

I think if not Ultron, maybe the Wrecking Crew?

Thanos has to be saved for number 3 I believe. But I also think if they decide to do more than 3 Avengers movies he should be saved as the ultimate test for them.

 

[cherokeesam]

Ultron is the obvious choice, but if they can't get Pym routed in some form to present day then I agree he should not be used.

I think if not Ultron, maybe the Wrecking Crew?

Thanos has to be saved for number 3 I believe. But I also think if they decide to do more than 3 Avengers movies he should be saved as the ultimate test for them.

The Wrecking Crew are too small a threat for The Avengers. At best, they're cannon fodder henchies for a Thor sequel.

Needs to be a global/universal threat --- Thanos, Kang, Ultron, HYDRA/AIM, Kree-Skrull, MOE, etc.

 

[BigThor]

^ Yeah, if they can't do Ultron properly I think the Masters of Evil and AIM working together could pose a major global threat in Avengers 2.

 

[Silvermoth]

Civil War would be interesting.

 

[Lady Marion]

I prefer Ultron in the next movie, Thanos in the third one.

Kang the Conqueror is my second choice.

 

[BigThor]

I prefer Ultron in the next movie, Thanos in the third one.

Kang the Conqueror is my second choice.

Those are my sentiments EXACTLY. t:

 

[SpideyFan866]

I want Thanos for the 2nd film and Kang for the 3rd.

 

[SpideyFan866]

Civil War would be interesting.

Agreed but that could only work if all the studios with Marvel properties could come to an agreement.

That storyline was birthed right out of the X-Men's long going registration storyline.

Also, Spidey has a significant part in it.

 

[marcvader]

Civil War would be interesting.

It could be but I'm in no rush to see it. First there are too many things that would need to happen for that story to even be possible and second there are too many other stories that are possible to make that I'd rather see.

 

[BigThor]

It could be but I'm in no rush to see it. First there are too many things that would need to happen for that story to even be possible and second there are too many other stories that are possible to make that I'd rather see.

 

[DOOZlovesBOOZ]

I don't see why Kang being the villain would make the budget higher than Thanos being the villain, I mean Thanos is one of the biggest threats in the MU.

Sry i didn't reply back, i forgot all about that post. But you're probably right, i didn't really think that over very well. I guess i just assumed having Kang you would need all the cgi effects with his powers and what not. Plus if we saw Kang i would want it to be an invasion kind of like the EMH series.

I have changed my mind on Kang recently and would rather not have him. IMO I think it might be a little redundant after this invasion in the first movie.

 

[DOOZlovesBOOZ]

Sticking with Ultron for the 2nd becuase i want hank, jan, and vision in the MCU as soon as possible. Thanos for the 3rd.

 

[Guerrilla]

I personally think that we will be getting more than 3 avengers movies. Or, it has the potential at least to have more than 3. Rotating roster, intertwining story arcs, villains like thanos and kang that could and should span multiple movies. If any superhero franchise was positioned for a 6 movie run, its the avengers. But if we get 3 then id choose ultron and kang.

 

[Silvermoth]

Agreed but that could only work if all the studios with Marvel properties could come to an agreement.

That storyline was birthed right out of the X-Men's long going registration storyline.

Also, Spidey has a significant part in it.

It wouldn't neccessarily have to be a direct adaption. They could just use the characters they own which would be a cool way of getting in some cameos of characters who may not get a chance in other media.

 

[BigThor]

I personally think that we will be getting more than 3 avengers movies. Or, it has the potential at least to have more than 3. Rotating roster, intertwining story arcs, villains like thanos and kang that could and should span multiple movies. If any superhero franchise was positioned for a 6 movie run, its the avengers. But if we get 3 then id choose ultron and kang.

Whenever two of the "Big Three" leave the the team (probably Thor and Iron Man), I'm going to become alot less interested in The Avengers.

 

[roach]

Ultron or masters of evil for 2
Thanos or korvac for 3

 

[Guerrilla]

Whenever two of the "Big Three" leave the the team (probably Thor and Iron Man), I'm going to become alot less interested in The Avengers.

I hear ya, but i'd still follow and go see an avengers movie #6 if it was carefully crafted with good reasons for heroes like ironman and thor to be absent and other heroes to fill their shoes. Black panther, the pyms, vision...it could work out and keep me more than a bit interested. Just saying...there is a lot of potential.

 

[MarvelKnight]

I'd rather see Avengers Vs. X-men (which will never happen) than Civil War. Hell, just about every hero is an avenger nowadays anyway so you'll basically get civil war 2 with just those 2 teams.

 

[The Morningstar]

No heroes vs heroes gimmicks please. Civil War was horrible and Avengers vs X-Men will also be horrible.

Annihilation is the way forward. That or Ultron Unlimited.