The Dark Knight Why Nolan Got Two Face Right...

But is Two Face evil?

This is why I said it won't be enough to see him go from "good" to "evil".

I prefer Loeb's Two Face who was a murderous vigilante more than a simple murderer.

Two-Face has rarely been a simple murdererer in the comics, at least in the modern era. More modern comics give him far more choices than just "killing people or not". He's always struggled with what to do in terms of right and wrong, justice VS vengeance and how to decide. Loeb just developed him more slowly from Dent into Two-Face than the comics did.

I hope his "reasons" in THE DARK KNIGHT aren't limited to simple revenge. I want to see the man struggle with his obsessions BEFORE he's Two-Face, so that afterward, when he acts on them, it doesn't feel like personal revenge. I'd prefer to see a motivation based more on Two-Face's "files", where he kills criminals who escape the law and those who aid them in doing so because no one else will do what he feels needs to be one.
 
At some point there was an interview with Caine, and he was talking about the Joker character.


Saying that Joker never takes off his make-up, but applies more and more as it fades away. And it starts to stain his face and such. Becoming permanent.

If its the quote I'm thinking of I think you took that out of context.

But if true, I'm happy as a clam.
 
I really like the vigilante angle, it makes him actually believable, he's choosing between justice the way Harvey would do and justice the way the monster inside wants, not just some random secret gangster personality, and it makes him, thematically, a type of Batman gone to far, Batman's drive for justice and the Joker's willingness to do anything.
 
That I could buy.
How easily you yield. Even though his neck and arms aren't white as they always have been through history. This modification, should it turn out to be what it looks like, is just unnecessary as it is ridiculous.
 
It's not that he was evil. It's just that spending time in the dark flipping a coin is unwholsome. Being unwholsome and being evil are two different things.

What the hell do you mean by "unwholesome"? :huh:
 
How easily you yield. Even though his neck and arms aren't white as they always have been through history. This modification, should it turn out to be what it looks like, is just unnecessary as it is ridiculous.

What? No.
 
Why Nolan got Two-Face right ? Well, maybe because he is a great director:woot: .
 
Nolan's precedent of realism and excellent character development (ex: Bruce's psyche) should have never left any of us in doubt as to the brilliance of how he would treat the Harvey Dent/Two-Face character in this film. He'd already said Harvey would be the backbone of this film, so I doubt he would go from "good" to "bad". As has already been said, the obvious point is that Dent is a white knight in a city of filth....everyone loves him, Bruce befriends him, Batman probably befriends him, Gordon probably befriends him, but yet the city that he is working so hard within the rules to save from people such as the Joker, is slipping out of his hands....and the events throughout the movie are going to push him to "justify the means", and push him to the brink of sanity, not creating, but adding to what will lead him into becoming Two-Face.
:sleepy:
 
Nolan's precedent of realism and excellent character development (ex: Bruce's psyche) should have never left any of us in doubt as to the brilliance of how he would treat the Harvey Dent/Two-Face character in this film. He'd already said Harvey would be the backbone of this film, so I doubt he would go from "good" to "bad". As has already been said, the obvious point is that Dent is a white knight in a city of filth....everyone loves him, Bruce befriends him, Batman probably befriends him, Gordon probably befriends him, but yet the city that he is working so hard within the rules to save from people such as the Joker, is slipping out of his hands....and the events throughout the movie are going to push him to "justify the means", and push him to the brink of sanity, not creating, but adding to what will lead him into becoming Two-Face.
:sleepy:

Why the smilie?
 
If its the quote I'm thinking of I think you took that out of context.

But if true, I'm happy as a clam.




I think he got it mixed up Caine said that Mr. j doesnt take off the make up nor does he touches it up, cain said that the make up is to look like he is letting it rot on his face. there was nothing said about him being perma white
 
So far, I think The Joker looks/sounds/is effin' incredible, and Two-Face looks to be much of the same. It was rather annoying that someone replied to the toy post a few weeks ago saying, "Looks more like 1/3 face."

For one, is it really that hard to accept a director's minor artistic changes? Plus, I find it incredibly hard to believe that the acid would create a line down the exact meridian of a person's face, "cutting" his face into exact halves.

I think the toy looked really good, and I hope it looks just as good in the movies.
 
How easily you yield. Even though his neck and arms aren't white as they always have been through history. This modification, should it turn out to be what it looks like, is just unnecessary as it is ridiculous.

I don't LIKE it - but if his face becomes perma-white, a bit of my problem with it would go away.
 
I don't LIKE it - but if his face becomes perma-white, a bit of my problem with it would go away.


My God, people are still whining about TDK's Joker not being perma-white?
Look, I'm as bummed as the next guy about it, but the fact is he IS NOT PERMA-WHITE. What good will it do to whine about it? This is Nolan's adaption of a classic icon....it looks to be the best and close to the source interpretation I've ever seen....I can live with him not being perma-white. In fact, I'd much rather have a non perma-white Heath than a tubby perma-white Jack Nicholson acting like Cesar Romero...and I love Jack.
 
My God, people are still whining about TDK's Joker not being perma-white?
Look, I'm as bummed as the next guy about it, but the fact is he IS NOT PERMA-WHITE. What good will it do to whine about it? This is Nolan's adaption of a classic icon....it looks to be the best and close to the source interpretation I've ever seen....I can live with him not being perma-white. In fact, I'd much rather have a non perma-white Heath than a tubby perma-white Jack Nicholson acting like Cesar Romero...and I love Jack.

Jack's joker was near perfect.
 
I don't LIKE it - but if his face becomes perma-white, a bit of my problem with it would go away.

Interesting enough though. This is out of respect cuz you know I loves ya Stormin. But you do make great points about how Nolan is getting the characterization right on Two-Face it seems to me he has hit the nail on the head. And I love what we have of Two-Face so far. Though some have complained about his look, not being perfectly half and half like it is in the comics. Yet you do not mention this. To me this is the same with the complaint of the Joker not being Permwhite. One little visual aspect, that is different. Yet Nolan has hit the nail on the head with the characterization of the Joker. And this to me is the same with Two-Face perfect characterization, but visually a little different then from before.

A while back I wrote this on the Makeup Page about the Joker. I hope you like it, to me its how I see what Nolan has done with the Joker.

I kinda took some time to write out “why” I don't mind the Joker not being perma-white. Now I'm not saying that, because I'm right, but I fully understand why Nolan took this route, and saw it still as the core of what makes the Joker, the Clown Prince Of Crime.

First I want to look at just the classic (and great) comic book version of the Joker. He is a man, no one really knows his history before the “accident” but that can always be left up for imagination. Yet when he fell into the chemicals by most versions his skin was bleached white. Now, I always try to look at it from a different point of view. Joker gets out of the vat of chemicals, now he is bleached. Technically being bleached skin does not make a person automatically a clown like person. There are real people out there with bleached skin, or pigment issues and right away one does not go: “Hey its a clown!” When the Joker saw himself in a mirror or what ever, he himself decided, and felt that he looked like a clown, then in deciding to make that so, he did many things to give him the clown appearance. White skin is just one step in looking like a clown. He put on theatrical clothes, of odd colors: purple, orange, green. To give him a more theatrical and some what comical look such as a clown. Adding red lipstick or black eye shadow on his eye sockets, to make himself look more clown like. Not only that he chose to use toys, and act like a clown, and laugh like one too. These for the most part are choices, though fate was thrust upon him, these were still choices made by him.

Technically the bleached Joker could have gone out people would of looked at him like a freak, but not necessarily a clown. And he could of gotten black paint and made himself look like a Zebra, and called him self the “Zebra Killer” but he did not, he chose the clown persona. And acted as such, either because he felt that is what he looked like or not, he still chose that look for himself.

Now look at the Joker in “The Dark Knight” we have a guy who we have no idea what his past is. Yet he clearly had a deformity thrust upon him, which was this time the accident is not chemicals but a freakish scar that made it look like a smile on his face. With this deformation just like the comic book Joker this one decided he looked like a clown, and put on make up, and made a clown ensemble: the purple, green, and orange look. Not only that he put on the red lipstick and black as well, though yes the difference is that he put on the white and the green hair as well. Yet he still has a deformation that makes him stand out in his own eyes, so because of this event he feels he needs to look like a clown, for what ever reason that may be, we will never know, its the Joker, he is truly and unknown in so many ways.

Yet again it seems to me that Nolan has the core of the character, yes he made one twist on it, but still the results are the same.


Both Jokers:

A. Had an accident that caused some type of deformation.
B. Both felt they must of looked like a clown in their own eyes.
  1. C.They both created the clown ensemble around their deformations.
Though I know some see it differently and that is fine. But to me Nolan contained the core of the Joker, in why he does what he does, and why he looks like a clown. Though the approach is different the results in some way are the same.

Though I know some people go well, a scar is not as deforming as a chemical bath. Well, I say “untrue” to that. People think scars are so easily fixed by plastic surgery, well they are not, besides TDKR why doesn't Two-Face right away turn around and get plastic surgery? Because its deeper then that, its not just because they physical deformation they are freaks, but the Joker is also a freak because of his mind, and the way he thinks. He is a sociopath he does not follow norms.

Technically if the Joker wanted to he could cover up being perma-white, with make up just as Joker did in B89, if he truly wanted to fit in. But he does not, the Joker does not fit in because he wants to be a freak. And he just adds to it by creating an clown ensemble.

And to me the scars in TDK are not just for visual alone. They are visuals in the sense that Nolan decided it to be the deformation process, yet on top of that, they are the deformation that sends the Joker over the edge, and making him, or having him dawn the clown persona. So the scars and the perma-white are both in a way two different deformations yet they achieve the same person we know as the Joker. In principle.

So in final words as I see it the Joker in TDK, and the Joker in the comics though they have a huge alteration, still achieve the same character, and characteristics of one another. I wrote this because some of the fine gentlemen on this board maybe wonder why I am completely fine with a make-up Joker. And this is because I see it this way. That they are both the Joker, and besides one deviation they both are the same character that we know and love.
 
Jack's joker was near perfect.

Though Jack's Joker is great, there is still many flaws ,just as Nolan's, I would not say flaws, cuz thats negative. I will say alterations.

Having a plastic surgery smile, being a little more chubby, and most important of all giving him a name, and making him Thomas and Martha's murderer.

Both have differences, there is no such thing as a perfect Joker, we can get close but each person has their own subjective view on how to go about the Joker.
 
it's realism and falling into chemicals and surviving is not possible, but I would like to know if Two face will suffer because of his bully incident when he was young.
 
Let's not put this thread back into the perma-white joker debate. We still have that thread for those who want to beat a dead horse.
 
Interesting enough though. This is out of respect cuz you know I loves ya Stormin. But you do make great points about how Nolan is getting the characterization right on Two-Face it seems to me he has hit the nail on the head. And I love what we have of Two-Face so far. Though some have complained about his look, not being perfectly half and half like it is in the comics. Yet you do not mention this. To me this is the same with the complaint of the Joker not being Permwhite. One little visual aspect, that is different. Yet Nolan has hit the nail on the head with the characterization of the Joker. And this to me is the same with Two-Face perfect characterization, but visually a little different then from before.

A while back I wrote this on the Makeup Page about the Joker. I hope you like it, to me its how I see what Nolan has done with the Joker.

I kinda took some time to write out “why” I don't mind the Joker not being perma-white. Now I'm not saying that, because I'm right, but I fully understand why Nolan took this route, and saw it still as the core of what makes the Joker, the Clown Prince Of Crime.

First I want to look at just the classic (and great) comic book version of the Joker. He is a man, no one really knows his history before the “accident” but that can always be left up for imagination. Yet when he fell into the chemicals by most versions his skin was bleached white. Now, I always try to look at it from a different point of view. Joker gets out of the vat of chemicals, now he is bleached. Technically being bleached skin does not make a person automatically a clown like person. There are real people out there with bleached skin, or pigment issues and right away one does not go: “Hey its a clown!” When the Joker saw himself in a mirror or what ever, he himself decided, and felt that he looked like a clown, then in deciding to make that so, he did many things to give him the clown appearance. White skin is just one step in looking like a clown. He put on theatrical clothes, of odd colors: purple, orange, green. To give him a more theatrical and some what comical look such as a clown. Adding red lipstick or black eye shadow on his eye sockets, to make himself look more clown like. Not only that he chose to use toys, and act like a clown, and laugh like one too. These for the most part are choices, though fate was thrust upon him, these were still choices made by him.

Technically the bleached Joker could have gone out people would of looked at him like a freak, but not necessarily a clown. And he could of gotten black paint and made himself look like a Zebra, and called him self the “Zebra Killer” but he did not, he chose the clown persona. And acted as such, either because he felt that is what he looked like or not, he still chose that look for himself.

Now look at the Joker in “The Dark Knight” we have a guy who we have no idea what his past is. Yet he clearly had a deformity thrust upon him, which was this time the accident is not chemicals but a freakish scar that made it look like a smile on his face. With this deformation just like the comic book Joker this one decided he looked like a clown, and put on make up, and made a clown ensemble: the purple, green, and orange look. Not only that he put on the red lipstick and black as well, though yes the difference is that he put on the white and the green hair as well. Yet he still has a deformation that makes him stand out in his own eyes, so because of this event he feels he needs to look like a clown, for what ever reason that may be, we will never know, its the Joker, he is truly and unknown in so many ways.

Yet again it seems to me that Nolan has the core of the character, yes he made one twist on it, but still the results are the same.


Both Jokers:

A. Had an accident that caused some type of deformation.
B. Both felt they must of looked like a clown in their own eyes.
  1. C.They both created the clown ensemble around their deformations.
Though I know some see it differently and that is fine. But to me Nolan contained the core of the Joker, in why he does what he does, and why he looks like a clown. Though the approach is different the results in some way are the same.

Though I know some people go well, a scar is not as deforming as a chemical bath. Well, I say “untrue” to that. People think scars are so easily fixed by plastic surgery, well they are not, besides TDKR why doesn't Two-Face right away turn around and get plastic surgery? Because its deeper then that, its not just because they physical deformation they are freaks, but the Joker is also a freak because of his mind, and the way he thinks. He is a sociopath he does not follow norms.

Technically if the Joker wanted to he could cover up being perma-white, with make up just as Joker did in B89, if he truly wanted to fit in. But he does not, the Joker does not fit in because he wants to be a freak. And he just adds to it by creating an clown ensemble.

And to me the scars in TDK are not just for visual alone. They are visuals in the sense that Nolan decided it to be the deformation process, yet on top of that, they are the deformation that sends the Joker over the edge, and making him, or having him dawn the clown persona. So the scars and the perma-white are both in a way two different deformations yet they achieve the same person we know as the Joker. In principle.

So in final words as I see it the Joker in TDK, and the Joker in the comics though they have a huge alteration, still achieve the same character, and characteristics of one another. I wrote this because some of the fine gentlemen on this board maybe wonder why I am completely fine with a make-up Joker. And this is because I see it this way. That they are both the Joker, and besides one deviation they both are the same character that we know and love.

I don't think one could say it better, very nice. I completely agree with you. :hoboj::applaud
 
it's realism and falling into chemicals and surviving is not possible, but I would like to know if Two face will suffer because of his bully incident when he was young.

Don't go down this path again.

Falling into chemicals and surviving is not impossible or unrealistic, I will stand up for that. It was nothing more then an artistic decision nothing to do with "realism"
 
You make an outstanding case, Solidus - by far one of the best Pro-Nolan article I have written.

Looking from it with THAT POV, I can buy it. I honestly can.

Again - I don't necessarily LIKE it - but I can buy it. I can see where it works.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"