Ahura Mazda
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2003
- Messages
- 10,586
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31

There you go from the Hulk feats page.
no mater how "fantastical" a story is... when on film your supose to make it BELIEVABLE... like you could actually picture yourself there..
like Spider-man, Superman, Pirates, Star Wars, Star Trek........very believable...it's fantasy, yes there's a degree of versimultude as in the Marvel Way, but let's not get carried away with the whole BELIEVABLE thing. Your supoposed to suspend belief with these films, though not entirely check one's brain at the door, *cough* Bay film *cough*.
I guess spideyboy would perhaps want more of a pause inbetween landing, recovering and then jumping again.
This is respectable as long as with each landing there is a considerable amount of ground damage.
... and looks kinda like he's flying
I think the TV show has a lot to do with the average person's reaction to the jumping.
Like this?
![]()
C'mon people.
You want "reality"? The reason fleas can jump the scale equivalent of a human jumping over a 480ft tall building, is because its leg's strength is so much greater than the actual weight of its body.
If the Hulk's legs can literally support a mountain, what do you think happens when he releases all that strength and energy in a jumping movement, supporting only a microfraction of the mountain's weight (his own body weight)?
Even then, the basic fact is, we are portraying a comic book character, and this is said character's many staples. IF you are really a Hulk/comic book fan, why the hell are you so worried about what the "mainstream" thinks? Don't you think if they play it well enough, that the fact that the Hulk jumps great distances will THEN become "mainstream" itself, sort of like Superman's flying?
It's your job as an actual fan to actually educate the up and coming fans - not cater to "what they would think".
HI GUYS, YOU KNOW THE ONLY THING I DIDN'T LIKE ABOUT THE FIRST ONE WAS THE ORIGIN AND THAT THEY LEFT OUT RICK JONES, I MEAN HOW HARD WOULD IT HAVE BEEN TO NAME HARPER, RICK, JUST TO INTRODUCE HIM TO THE MOVIEVERSE!!!DON'T GET ME WRONG, I LOVED THE FIRST ONE, I JUST REALLY WISH RICK WAS PART OF THE STORY!!! OH AND BY THE WAY THE LEAPAGE AND THE RUNAGE IN THE FIRST ONE WAS DA BOMB!!!
up:
Like this?
![]()
C'mon people.
You want "reality"? The reason fleas can jump the scale equivalent of a human jumping over a 480ft tall building, is because its leg's strength is so much greater than the actual weight of its body.
If the Hulk's legs can literally support a mountain, what do you think happens when he releases all that strength and energy in a jumping movement, supporting only a microfraction of the mountain's weight (his own body weight)?
True except when he jumps by releasing that much force he should leave a huge crater in the ground just from jumping. If you were standing still and had enough power to jump up a mile...the ground would not just remain the same.
i agree that was a problem.True except when he jumps by releasing that much force he should leave a huge crater in the ground just from jumping. If you were standing still and had enough power to jump up a mile...the ground would not just remain the same.
So, let me get this straight: Running at speeds of 170 mph to 300 mph looks ridiculous, but jumping distances that defy all known physics somehow doesn't? The more I read this forum, the more amazed I am. Leaping may be "Hulk," but it was entirely UNrealistic in the first film, if you ask me. I mean, here they are making a serious film and then they have Hulk do something that - even with all of his strength considered - would never be possible without legs that rival those of a grasshopper or something else of comparable elasticity. Hulk's legs have no such characteristics and it completely took away from the movie's believability. At least with Spider-Man, the things that his webs can do have some sense of credibility about them. A green monster bounding all over the globe has no credibility whatsoever. So, if you want another Hulk that fails in the box office, just keep having him leap from plateau to plateau... just like you want it. And then blame the writer or whomever else would be responsible for the movie's failure to live up to your expectations.
i think that kind of leaping ability is possible when you think about how his legs supported a 150 billion ton mountain.
by the way, rarely does anything that a super-powered hero does believable. IMO, hulk's leaping didn't cause the first movie to flop. ang lee is responsible for that fiasco. the comic book panels, the hulk's pretty boy looks and his feminine roar were for more detrimental than leaping great distances.
i think that kind of leaping ability is possible when you think about how his legs supported a 150 billion ton mountain.
by the way, rarely does anything that a super-powered hero does believable. IMO, hulk's leaping didn't cause the first movie to flop. ang lee is responsible for that fiasco. the comic book panels, the hulk's pretty boy looks and his feminine roar were for more detrimental than leaping great distances.
True except when he jumps by releasing that much force he should leave a huge crater in the ground just from jumping. If you were standing still and had enough power to jump up a mile...the ground would not just remain the same.
You all are finally starting to get it. Hulk's jumping simply has to look real... that's all I'm saying. I'm NOT saying that it ruined the first movie or that everything about the Hulk has to be believable. It just helps when it corresponds with the laws of physics. Hulk springing off the ground like a flea and landing with no obvious impact corresponds with NOTHING, just the wild imagination of fans who don't know or care about physics.