One thing thats missing to that is that WB/DC were/are in a legal situation with the Siegel family and needed to have a Superman movie in production by a certain date. I know all about the "Goyer's idea" story, but honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if that story wasn't entirely truthful. People make up PR stories all the time in hollywood.
Listen to what this script reader is saying. WB wants ALL of their superhero films to be "Gritty, realistic" much in the same way TDK trilogy was. Mark Waid has gone on record saying that WB essentially dosen't like Superman and they constantly wonder how he could be more like Batman. They get a bunch of creators known for "Dark, realistic superheroes" to do Superman. IMO, WB was/is very motivated to have Superman films more in the tone of Batman, a proven success.
. I just skimmed through the whole discussion. All I got was just Wonder Women being dark/gritty and her being a mutated human from Kryptonian bacteria.I forgot about that. You do have a point that WB got off their lazy a**** to reboot Superman only because of the legal situation but the way I see it, they got lucky with Goyer getting a story just in time. Of course I have no solid evidence but I don't see a reason why they would be lying in the first place. If you believe that though, then fair enough. It's not too crazy of a notion in the first place given WB's poor track record and almost-shamefulness of their properties.
I....didn't know that. I just skimmed through the whole discussion. All I got was just Wonder Women being dark/gritty and her being a mutated human from Kryptonian bacteria.
If that is the case though, then any hope I had for the future of DC films just went down the drain.

Listen to what this script reader is saying. WB wants ALL of their superhero films to be "Gritty, realistic" much in the same way TDK trilogy was. Mark Waid has gone on record saying that WB essentially dosen't like Superman and they constantly wonder how he could be more like Batman. They get a bunch of creators known for "Dark, realistic superheroes" to do Superman. IMO, WB was/is very motivated to have Superman films more in the tone of Batman, a proven success.
David Goyer said:Relatable and realistic doesn't necessarily mean dark. I think it would be inappropriate for us to approach a Superman film as if we were doing The Dark Knight. The Batman films are a lot more nihilistic; Superman has always been a story about hope.
Man of Steel wasn't really done in the tone of Nolan's Batman trilogy in my opinion. It aped the visual aesthetic at some points (but was wholly Snyder), and kind of borrowed the non-linear narrative origin from Begins. But other than that, I thought tonally it was on the other end of the spectrum. Goyer even went out of his way to exclaim they he was explicitly not trying approach Superman the way he did Batman.
Also, I don't know how true this is, but Goyer's Flash script was supposed to be dark too.
Obviously, its not going to be the exact same thing. But I think there's a reason why people criticize the tone of the movie, and its not just a matter of "I hate Snyder" or "I have Donner bias", not to say that hasn't played a part.
If an agency likes it enough, that is one way it happens. yes. WB can also pick writers to write it.
...Krypton being the catalyst for accretion in the DC universe is something that not only can I live with, I find it kinda brilliant.
Wonder Woman and the Amazons should not be reduced to a bunch of infected chimera at the beginnings of human civilisation.
More than the themes of sexism/feminism, a huge theme to be explored is religion, and how the world reacts to her.
Recently, the planet had just been shaken to its core (literally) in the discovery that we are not alone. We are no longer the top if the food chain and we are neither special nor unique in the universe. However, those religious types can take solace in the fact that their belief system comforts them. But what then happens when a bastion/icon/representative of a dead religion springs forth? How would The Vatican react to such an event? What would be the implications to those people, the Greek pantheon as a religion would no longer be belief, but fact.
Then introduce Flash, challenging that which we thought we knew about the physical world, then Aquaman with the historical and Green Lantern showing everybody there's always a bigger threat.
The potential for building tension amongst the public and the JL are ripe, and WB would be fools to not pursue it.

I don't necessarily mind the idea, but I think they'd have to be very careful in their execution of it. One wrong move and certain plot points might come across as contrived.
I don't necessarily mind the idea, but I think they'd have to be very careful in their execution of it. One wrong move and certain plot points might come across as contrived.
For years, I've tried not jump on the "DC/WB can't do anything right" bandwagon.
But between GL trying to be Iron Man, MOS trying to be a Superman version of The Dark Knight trilogy, and this script sounding more forced than "Iron Man 2" when it comes to tying in to a larger superhero universe, I have to believe that...they don't know what they're doing.
Their plan is to rip off anything popular (Dark/Gritty, MCU) instead of letting the characters be the characters. And since DC/WB has no faith in their non Batman characters, no one else does either.
That's true but it really only applies to WW and Flash...
And a wrong move the other way and they become Superman-lite.
So I've read through this thread and I'm not gonna lie, whether any of this is true or not (no offence to jd23 but this is the internet), I'm actually quite ok with what I've read about this supposed WW script. The reason being is that Man of Steels world is essentially a sci-fi world more than a superhero world, and the biggest issue I had with that world was it's inability to expand beyond that genre to incorporate characters like WW, FL, AQM etc, these changes to the characters' back story using Krypton as a foundation actually work in the context of that sci-fi world. I always wanted a Greek Mythology based WW film, but that was only going to work if she had her own universe to play off of. Given the cards MoS dealt the entire pantheon of DC heroes these changes I've read not only make sense, but they're alterations I kinda have to tip my hat towards because they've managed to navigate a very difficult track. Krypton being the catalyst for accretion in the DC universe is something that not only can I live with, I find it kinda brilliant.
Obviously, its not going to be the exact same thing. But I think there's a reason why people criticize the tone of the movie, and its not just a matter of "I hate Snyder" or "I have Donner bias", not to say that hasn't played a part.
This is a joke, right?[/QUOTE
You summed up the great thing about the whole concept of the Justice League. These are characters that are essentially from different worlds and genres who came together to battle one common threat. They are vastly different from one another, but that is also why they compliment each other so well in the first place.
What? How?
Nolan may have reinvented the character looks in his Batman series, but the core of the characters was still there.
Those crossing of genres doesn't really mesh well on film, especially when one that's starting the series is cemented as a sci-fi movie. The thing about a lot of sci-fi films is that they tend to always be more of a 'what if' type of thing, they try to create a world that is believable, where as straight up superhero films are never really concerned with the world they inhabit, they're very neutral in their setting where it's not really a fantasy world and yet not really trying to depict a believable world. This is why I thought MoS being the starting point for an expanded universe was a terrible way to kick things off because its feet are firmly planted in trying to be a believable sci-fi world making expansion for other characters based off their back story and genre difficult. But if Krypton is the foundation of everything about the DC universe then that changes the ballgame. Characters back story would have to change, some to a substantial degree, but as long as the core foundations of who the character are remain then I think those could be changes for the good.
Heading out for a bit. Will be back tomorrow if there are any more questions.
I'm just glad Batman is my favorite superhero. At least WB can get him right (albeit in spite of themselves, methinks).