Would you enter into a non-sexual relationship?

[Wilhelm-Scream]

lol

Things To See

• Man Flashing A Dog In The Woods

...check

 

[Halcohol]

Are you the cripple or the cripples husband in this scenario?

Well... I'll be the husband... as long as there's the hours and hours of oral sex that were mentioned.

 

[Darren Daring]

that's acceptible within the realms of non-sex according to the first post (as long as the 'cripple' is fine with such).

just non- full on or whatever equivalent lesbian couples would get up to (not trying to discriminate).

would this mean you would be more willing?

Uhh, I geuss it would be alright. She would probably get really good at it, and I could make it up to her by buying her stuff

 

[Darren Daring]

Well... I'll be the husband... as long as there's the hours and hours of oral sex that were mentioned.

Well, then I thikn the numerous blowjobs would count as showing her sexuality.

 

[Erzengel]

Dog: That sausage is too little. Won't satisfy my hunger. I'll pass.

Maybe it's cold in the woods.

lol

Things To See

• Man Flashing A Dog In The Woods

...check

LOL.

 

[Halcohol]

Well, then I thikn the numerous blowjobs would count as showing her sexuality.

That works for me. Where do I sign?

 

[DBella]

Maybe it's cold in the woods.

Ahh... that didn't cross dog's mind. Stupido cane!

Well, then I thikn the numerous blowjobs would count as showing her sexuality.

I would agree. I guess some people think that only intercourse qualifies as sex.

 

[Halcohol]

I was under the impression the purpose of this thread was "Would you enter into a relationship with someone where there would be no sexual contact of any kind.... EVER?"

 

[Darren Daring]

That's too difficult a question. It would expose too many people's weak characters, so we had to change it.

 

[DBella]

I was under the impression the purpose of this thread was "Would you enter into a relationship with someone where there would be no sexual contact of any kind.... EVER?"

The threadmaker used the term "full sex" and didn't specify if that means no sexual contact of any kind. I think.

 

[Halcohol]

That's too difficult a question. It would expose too many people's weak characters, so we had to change it.

If I met someone and hit it off and knew that there was no chance of ever getting physically intimate with them... EVER... I wouldn't go out with them. Physical intimacy is important to me.

Does that mean I'm weak? I don't think so.

 

[Erzengel]

The threadmaker used the term "full sex" and didn't specify if that means no sexual contact of any kind. I think.

Feel like I'm in a Bill Clinton Interview, it uh depends on what you mean by sex.

 

[Darren Daring]

If I met someone and hit it off and knew that there was no chance of ever getting physically intimate with them... EVER... I wouldn't go out with them. Physical intimacy is important to me.

Does that mean I'm weak? I don't think so.

I don't thikn I would do it either, but it makes me feel like a bit of a tool.

 

[Halcohol]

I don't thikn I would do it either, but it makes me feel like a bit of a tool.

Me too

I'm a Scorpio, though. I can't help it... at least that's the excuse I'm sticking with.

 

[Erzengel]

I don't thikn I would do it either, but it makes me feel like a bit of a tool.

Why? Intimacy may not be the #1 thing in a relationship but should be in the top 3. It shouldn't make one a bad person because one looks for that?

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

The threadmaker used the term "full sex".

"Well I had a great time. I hate to see the evening end. Would you like to come upstairs and full-sex?"

 

[Halcohol]

"Well I had a great time. I hate to see the evening end. Would you like to come upstairs and full-sex?"

"No thanks, I shouldn't have full-sex. It keeps me up."

 

[Darren Daring]

Why? Intimacy may not be the #1 thing in a relationship but should be in the top 3. It shouldn't make one a bad person because one looks for that?

Alas... My head? She agrees with you.

Ahhh

The Heart? She no agree.

 

[November Rain]

"Well I had a great time. I hate to see the evening end. Would you like to come upstairs and full-sex?

is that what they are calling coffee these days?

 

[Erzengel]

Alas... My head? She agrees with you.

Ahhh

The Heart? She no agree.

Well tell your heart that sometimes words are not sufficent enough to express one's feelings and maybe action is the only suitable way.

 

[Wilhelm-Scream]

Alas... My head? She agrees with you.

Ahhh

The Heart? She no agree.

HAha. Your heart and mind are feminine.

 

[Darren Daring]

You're just not as well spoken as me

 

[Darren Daring]

HAha. Your heart and mind are feminine.

Everything is feminine when you're a Lousiana Creole Riverboat Philosopher.

 

[Erzengel]

You're just not as well spoken as me

I rely on a puppet show using metaphors and innuendo.

 

[November Rain]

I was under the impression the purpose of this thread was "Would you enter into a relationship with someone where there would be no sexual contact of any kind.... EVER?"

well acts generally considered as foreplay i deem as foreplay.

If it's full penetrative (or its equivalent), then i would consider that as sex, personally and a separate entity from foreplay.

in any case answer which way you want as long as you definte your terms accordingly, just try to stick to mine if you happen to be voting on ze poll.

:heart:​