Apocalypse X-Men Apocalypse News and Discussion

[danoyse]

Xmen movies just favourited one of my tweets in which I said what's up with nothing x related at comic con. I don't want it favourited I want it rectified

They really don't know how that works, do they? They also retweeted one of Angamb's tweets of a fake Variety headline announcing three more movies.

 

[marvelrobbins]

I just don't understand why someone would send out fake news of 3 more films.

 

[psylockolussus]

Any word on DOFP's panel?

And for this picture, do they have more mutants in this display?

Anyone noticed that Nightcrawler is included? I think thats a hint that we will see the character in Apocalypse!

 

[JP]

Nothing from the Kinberg DoFP panel?

 

[def28]

I have not been able to find one thing on that panel besides it being in the schedule.

 

[psylockolussus]

Same here, I've been googling and checking news on Twitter and nothing.

So that means nothing major happened.

 

[def28]

I'm questioning if it ever happened at all. There should have been something informative from there that comic sites would post on. There's just nothing.

 

[JP]

The moderator of the panel tweeted about posting a podcast "soon"

 

[def28]

Nice

 

[hoy-small-fry]

Boo-urns... Nothing at all

Not the news I was hoping to wake up to

 

[kasjan]

Given that he said Apocalypse is the end of this "trilogy" I see the next trilogy being about Cyclops, Storm, and Jean.

Also love that he calls them the "traditional X-Men team".

If that's true, we will finally have movie about X-Men team, not Magneto, Mystique, Xavier or about Wolverine.
Fassbender is very good, but hope it won't be about Magneto once again. Bring on other villains: Mr. Sinister, Shadow King and more of Apocalypse.

And if we talk about original cast, I would love to see Famke, Marsden, Grammer, Foster and Ashmore as X-Factor against Apocalypse in future, because we can't see them as X-Men team when they're young. Apocalypse should be villain for 3 movies.

 

[Dead Man Dann]

Tatum talks Gambit (no real info, but he does some card-throwing):
http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/1065382/channing-tatum-auditioned-for-gambit-in-full-costume.jhtml#id=1728884

Kinberg on Angel and timeline changes:
http://www.mtv.com/videos/movies/1065367/simon-kinberg-clears-up-x-men-apocalypse-cast-rumors.jhtml#id=1728884

He mentions that, in the new timeline, people may have been born at different times.

 

[Alison Blaire]

It's ridiculous what Kinberg says .With the time travel, age of the characters is not changed.
It's a stupid way to make a reboot.

 

[psylockolussus]

Im not surprised, if they ignored some things in the past and they can always do it again. Personally Im not happy about it. Even if they are now in a new timeline, changing birth dates is still questionable. I hope they dont introduce Angel as an adult or teen in Apocalypse.

 

[roach]

It's ridiculous what Kinberg says .With the time travel, age of the characters is not changed.
It's a stupid way to make a reboot.

why is it stupid? Messing with the timeline could have changed when people are born.
Example: I was born after my father got out of the Army and back from Vietnam (yes I'm old). If there was no vietnam I may have been born sooner (if my father never joined or sent overseas) or never (something happening to my father)

 

[Dead Man Dann]

I have a feeling they won't actually commit to the "born earlier" thing, but we'll see.

 

[Dead Man Dann]

why is it stupid? Messing with the timeline could have changed when people are born.
Example: I was born after my father got out of the Army and back from Vietnam (yes I'm old). If there was no vietnam I may have been born sooner (if my father never joined or sent overseas) or never (something happening to my father)

But would it have been "you" that was born? That's the problem.

 

[Alison Blaire]

In the future we saw the characters in the new timeline and they had the same ages.

 

[roach]

In the future we saw the characters in the new timeline and they had the same ages.

did we see Angel in the new timeline?

 

[Dead Man Dann]

One more thing-- regardless of the timeline change, Warren would've still had to have been born well before 1973. There's only a ten-year gap between DOFP and Apocalypse.

 

[psylockolussus]

But would it have been "you" that was born? That's the problem.

He would have been a different person in my opinion if he was born earlier.

 

[Dead Man Dann]

Yep, exactly. I already find it a little hard to believe that Kitty, Bobby, etc. are still themselves in the future-- different birth dates are even more of a stretch.

 

[psylockolussus]

In the future we saw the characters in the new timeline and they had the same ages.

Yeah. So why should it to be different for the others? Because they were not included in that scene?

 

[psylockolussus]

Yep, exactly. I already find it a little hard to believe that Kitty, Bobby, etc. are still themselves in the future-- different birth dates are even more of a stretch.

Not only that there are factors such as gender, for the films, the x gene.

Theres no telling if you delayed your birthdate or make a wayfor your parents to make a baby earlier that it would still be you. To make it simple, imo stick with the ages that were established in timeline A.

 

[marvelrobbins]

This Is confirmation like Star Trek films this is basicly a almost enitre different franchise now.

Nutrek made so many changes even the pretrek 2009 Trek history.

What this says to me any Character not seen In future the wolverine we know woke up In new future Is fair game no matter what their age in trilogy or original future of DOFP.

Rogue,Iceman,Kitty,and Colossus most likely won't be seen In future films because of new ending as long as they remain In 1980's or even 1990's.

This allowes them to use say Angel and Blink In Apocalypse.In a 1980's or 1990's set X-force you can ignore fact Psylocke was In 2000's set Last Stand.

DOFP was basicly the final Chapter of series which started In 2000.DOFP was start of new series that does keep FC In cannon.