2:20 seems a bit long, though.
Really? As far as I'm concerned, the best blockbusters around all run between 130-150..There's nothing intrinsically indicative correlating quality to length, but seriously..the only really great blockbusters to come out under 130 minutes recently were Star Trek and Iron Man (Tron can come too). Blockbusters typically have big loaded scripts, and demand long running times. I doubt X-Men will drag!
AgreedX-men looks to be packed. i wouldn't mind a running time close to the Nolan Bat flicks.
Don't forget 2012 that film was bad and long.
lol, so what?Don't forget 2012 that film was bad and long.
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/456865/X-Men-First-Class/overview
New York Times reporting 2 hours and 20 minute run time. Usually an accurate source for this kind of info.
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/456865/X-Men-First-Class/overview
New York Times reporting 2 hours and 20 minute run time. Usually an accurate source for this kind of info.
That's not how it works.That's pretty surprising. I'd have expected with the quick timeline and this being Fox, we'd have to deal with a short (albeit well-crafted) product. Glad that's wrong.