Majik1387
Avenger
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2004
- Messages
- 41,629
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 33
Im not completely disagreeing but where is that proven ? There is no proof that the more faithful you are the worse your film will be. There are far more examples of bad adaptations not going well with critics, audience and fans. If your talking line for line panel for panel then yeah that wont work for all films. Most material is just out of date in terms of dialogue. It has worked for a few though. What works for fans has also worked for the audience. Unless your film is just random easter eggs thats impossible for anyone with prior knowledge of comics to follow.
They have cut out oppurtunies to add to certain characters, develop characters, have solid continuity and tell storylines. There world is a mess. If FC is a reboot then this clears things up. They actually have to retcon certain films and elemts for their series to make sense. That is far from a success.
If they followed Wolverines Wepon X Origin from comics or what was lead to be a much more violent and meaningfull Weapon X project in X2 then that would have helped with XMOW. Instead its Wolverine meets other mutants and does nothing the movie. Messing with things and having no respect for the characters is what led to bad films. And like Ive pointed out before not everyone hates X3 and Origins, its mostly the fans. Be it fans of the movies or comics. X3 did huge sales in Box office, DVD and holds decent audience ratings on online sites like RT. FC should stick on the path its made. Any characters they add or develop further should be driven from the comics. The plots more then likely not gonna resemble the comic in any way. Messing with character personalities and powers are what will piss me off. The reason FC exists is beacuse of the other films failures, so I guess thats one good thing to come out of the bad films. Encouraging to mess with future X films characters source material is a bad idea.
Yeah, I have my problems with Watchmen. The general audience might not complain about comic inaccuracy but they wont complain when its accurate either. 300 and Sin City were pretty big with both crowds and the Avengers even though not a direct adaptation is a huge success. I see way more pros then cons.Some might say Watchmen was an example of an overly faithful adaptation. Even if it changed the ending from alien threat to nuclear blast, it was (up to that point) a very accurate comic-to-screen project.
I loved Watchmen but can also see it put things in there 'just because'. As a geek, it's a terrific film. For anyone else, it was a bit of a mystery.
Maybe they'll use Synch like Vaughn originally wanted.
Speaking of Emma, I loved the "brain freeze" icy effect when she blocked Charles' telepathy in the yacht scene.![]()
Guess no one believes me? Ok. I'll see ya when the movie begans.
Speaking of Emma, I loved the "brain freeze" icy effect when she blocked Charles' telepathy in the yacht scene.![]()
Believe what? That off-topic post about you being an actor? I'm not sure people really care either way... half the people on this forum are actors. I'm not trying to be rude, but it seems like you're really seeking attention and giving next-to-no time for people to give it to you... if they do at all. This thread's about discussing First Class sequels, not talking about your career. We have general discussion lounges for that.
For a movie about equality and civil rights I hope that they include more nationalities. As an actor that's pretty frustrating. Which is my whole reason for mentioning and inquiring about another black mutant being added. But don't take this the wrong way. I understand.