My condolences for your loss Shauner.
I only saw
Joker once and enjoyed it, but I think it's got some major script issues. I didn't fully buy Arthur's transition to the Joker. I mean, I bought how he got from point A to point B, but then the film uses "craziness" as an excuse to get him from point B to point C (particularly after he's off the meds). That's just lazy writing. You can write a "crazy" character whose motivations and actions still 'make sense' to the audience.
I also think it can't decide if Arthur is supposed to be an everyman, or a metaphor for how we treat mental health. He doesn't really work as an everyman because he's got some pretty serious issues. Not anyone would snap and become the Joker under his circumstances, something the movie kinda acknowledges at the same time as playing up the "everyman" aspect.
The mother being there didn't make sense either. If she was seriously that abusive, and it was all on file, no way they'd still let her maintain custody.
The mother thing aside, I think the first two problems I mentioned were always gonna be there no matter what. I don't think you can make a Joker origin film that makes sense. It's one of those things that's left better for interpretation. I felt that way both before and after seeing the film.
As a sidenote...anyone else felt the Batman origin was super awkward in this

? It wasn't some random mugging this time, it was a politically-motivated murder by someone from a working-class movement. So I guess this Batman will grow up to be a Fascist. Like, not just in the Frank Miller sense. I mean a genuine card-carrying Fascist.
