2007 NFL Thread

[CConn]

Eh, he had a bad game.

And it was still him that pulled it out in the end by scoring the touchdown, and putting them in position to score the field goal. A lesser quarterback couldn't do that.

 

[Excel]

And who have they beaten this year?

Lets clarify something.

"Beaten".

Yeah; on paper they have won the games; they have "beaten" the opponents.

They have beaten 1 team by 29 points, 2 teams by 24 points, 1 team by 21 points, and 1 team by 17 points.

And that is when they are pretty much taking it easy on them for the whole 4th quarter. The 2and string running back is getting 10 carries a game; and they have only gone deep to Moss 2 times all year.

Maybe the standings say they are "beating" teams, but on the scoreboard; they are/putting a ****ING UP/BLOWING OUT/KICKING THE **** OUT OF THEM/ASS BEATING/BUTT KICKING the other teams.

If they were beating San Duego, Cincinatti; and co. by 3-7; maybe even 10 points; then the "they have an easy schedule" argument might work.

They "BEAT" 4 of the 5 teams theyve played by 3 touchdowns minimum; it doesnt work.

Logic would say if they DESTROY average opponents, they will BEAT good ones. It wont be a huge blow out; but theyll win alright.

 

[Excel]

Ah, that's it. Blame the offensive lines.

Cause, y'know, it's everybody's fault but Reggie's.

Psh; Bush has a lot work on. All I am saying is it ha sbeen 1 game and he is already showed what I was refering to; when he has this role week in and week out and gets used to it like he will in the coming weeks; his numbers will continue to grow significantly.

 

[KALEL114]

Jussayin'...

All Cowboys fans here in Dallas did chew Romo up today. It means something that the Boys came back and won it, but Romo was still god-awful, and we know that.

Where did that happen? I haven't heard him being "chewed up". Sports talk radio has done nothing but praise him for coming back in the end.

 

[Excel]

P.S. Matt Lienarts NFL career is already in jeopardy.

Wow.

 

[CConn]

Psh; Bush has a lot work on. All I am saying is it ha sbeen 1 game and he is already showed what I was refering to; when he has this role week in and week out and gets used to it like he will in the coming weeks; his numbers will continue to grow significantly.

As will your delusions of grandeur.

 

[Excel]

As will your delusions of grandeur.

How did my delusions of AP owning the NFL this year work out?

 

[SouLeSS]

Tampa Bay's done for the season.

 

[CConn]

How did my delusions of AP owning the NFL this year work out?

Aunt Petunia hasn't owned a thing in his life, and you know it.

 

[StorminNorman]

How did my delusions of AP owning the NFL this year work out?

I predict the sun will rise tomorrow.

If and when it happens, it doesn't make me a profit - only that I poses enough brain function to be able to predict the predictable.

 

[Showtime]

The same can be said about the Patriots also.

No, that's the Colts.

 

[Showtime]

And who have they beaten this year? The truth is both teams have not played good teams yet. Which is why it is a good measuring stick for both teams.

Well they didn't almost get beat by the Bills I can tell you that. Brady didn't throw 5 interceptions against one of the worst defenses in the league, I can tell you that.

 

[KALEL114]

Lets clarify something.

"Beaten".

Yeah; on paper they have won the games; they have "beaten" the opponents.

They have beaten 1 team by 29 points, 2 teams by 24 points, 1 team by 21 points, and 1 team by 17 points.

And that is when they are pretty much taking it easy on them for the whole 4th quarter. The 2and string running back is getting 10 carries a game; and they have only gone deep to Moss 2 times all year.

Maybe the standings say they are "beating" teams, but on the scoreboard; they are/putting a ****ING UP/BLOWING OUT/KICKING THE **** OUT OF THEM/ASS BEATING/BUTT KICKING the other teams.

If they were beating San Duego, Cincinatti; and co. by 3-7; maybe even 10 points; then the "they have an easy schedule" argument might work.

They "BEAT" 4 of the 5 teams theyve played by 3 touchdowns minimum; it doesnt work.

Logic would say if they DESTROY average opponents, they will BEAT good ones. It wont be a huge blow out; but theyll win alright.

7-17. That is the combined record that NE opponents have. They are suppose to beat them bad escpecially since all of them have the worst defenses in the league.. They haven't even played a team with a .500 record yet. This is a test for them, period.

 

[Jerry!]

Which team do you have more doubt in? The answer to that is the answer to the question which team is this game a test for. The Patriots ARE the measuring stick for how a football team is supposed to play.

 

[Showtime]

7-17. That is the combined record that NE opponents have. They are suppose to beat them bad escpecially since all of them have the worst defenses in the league.. They haven't even played a team with a .500 record yet. This is a test for them, period.

Well judging by the performance of the Cowboys against the Bills, the Cowboys need to be afraid. If they performed like that against any other team in the NFL, nevermind the Patriots, they would have gotten their asses handed to them.

 

[Excel]

I predict the sun will rise tomorrow.

and I predict that same way yall are saying after 1 game Bush aint dominating that if next week he rushes for 150 yards and 2 tds and recieves for 100 yards you will say

"its one week; no way he holds it up the whole season."


Truth is it is one week; see he keeps doing.

 

[Excel]

7-17. That is the combined record that NE opponents have. They are suppose to beat them bad escpecially since all of them have the worst defenses in the league.. They haven't even played a team with a .500 record yet. This is a test for them, period.

5 of those losses came against us; so outside they are 7-12 and thats 5 less victories they could have had

The Pats beat the Bills by 31 points. The Cowboys beat them by just 1 point.

You do the math.

 

[CConn]

7-17. That is the combined record that NE opponents have. They are suppose to beat them bad escpecially since all of them have the worst defenses in the league.. They haven't even played a team with a .500 record yet. This is a test for them, period.

A test they'll pass, but a test nonetheless.

 

[CConn]

5 of those losses came against us; so outside they are 7-12 and thats 5 less victories they could have had

The Pats beat the Bills by 31 points. The Cowboys beat them by just 1 point.

You do the math.

The math is Tom Brady had a good game, and Tony Romo didn't.

 

[KALEL114]

5 of those losses came against us; so outside they are 7-12 and thats 5 less victories they could have had

The Pats beat the Bills by 31 points. The Cowboys beat them by just 1 point.

You do the math.

Now, now. I have already agreed that this is a huge test for Dallas. That isn't the issue here. The issue is that you do not believe this is a test for NE. NE has not played agianst a good team yet. They are coming to a good teams house this Sunday. It is test for them.

 

[Excel]

Its more of a quiz than a test. The test will be colts.

But my bold prediction of the week...if Laurence Maroney plays hell be 2nd for the Pats in recieving yards but I also expect Moss to break 100 again.

One place these teams arent even is running game; Pats kill em. In order to take Moss, Stallworth, Welker and Watson out of the equation next week (besides covering them downfield with corners, safeties, and line backers) they are gonna try and put huge pressure on Brady. Every time he drops back the RB will be wide open in the backfield.

Maroney in flats. Screens to him will be very valuable.

The Patriots can keep the Cowboys offense contained because they are so unbalanced without a good consistent running game. Patriots can't as long as Maroney is in the game. Morris alone is hardly a threat.

 

[LegendaryCaleb]

huge bragathon over here towards dallas...darn cowboys

 

[dr venture]

 

[Jerry!]

Falcons to get $20 million in bonuses back from Vick. Mer-cy!

 

[Fran]

Add me to the sig, Excel. Bush ain't gonna dominate, btw.