JP
Smelly
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2005
- Messages
- 61,007
- Reaction score
- 1,307
- Points
- 103
Why's that?
Because I thought her performance was fantastic. . .
Julia Roberts, Halle Berry... now those are undeserving.
Why's that?
Here is where I stand on that. Dreamgirls was a great film. Hudson proved that she can act, and she did a good job at it. However, she won the award because she could sing. There were far more deserving actresses worthy of that award than she was. Give her a Grammy, not an Oscar.
That's just me...
Bird needs to move into the non-animated realm. He is so damn talented (BIRD FOR SUPERMAN!). Ironically, if he did direct live action, the academy would never ever give his type of movies a second thought.
I'm starting to wonder if in 2009 they'll give Heath Ledger the oscar for Joker, seeing as he is dead.
I didn't say it was a good one.That would be the worst reason to give it to him.
Because I thought her performance was fantastic. . .
Julia Roberts, Halle Berry... now those are undeserving.
So whats the next award?
Uh his next movie is a LIVE ACTION period piece/disaster movie.
What exactly would she get a grammy for..?
I didn't say it was a good one.
I'm starting to wonder if in 2009 they'll give Heath Ledger the oscar for Joker, seeing as he is dead.
I'm starting to wonder if in 2009 they'll give Heath Ledger the oscar for Joker, seeing as he is dead.
Wow, didn't think he'd be presenting after he tried to kill himself.

TF got rapedTransformers got jacked.

Well he has a few other films coming out that year...at least one other. And I'm not sure whether or not his Bob Dylan one made the cut-off. But I could totally see the Academy pulling a move like that.Let's see the movie first.
