The Dark Knight Rises 6 Minutes of TDKR footage attached to Mission Impossible 4! - - - Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
One was shot and thrown out of the plane. The other stayed behind to die in the crash since the CIA agent let Langley know that he had one prisioner. I guess Bane wan'st to keep them guessing about his resources and doesn't want to decalre he's capable of bringing down a CIA plane.
No one was shot and thrown out. CIA guy was bluffing to get them to talk.
 
No one was shot and thrown out. CIA guy was bluffing to get them to talk.

Oddly enough, doesn't Littlefinger say "he didn't fly too well" after shooting and apparently not tossing him out?
 
^ He does. I have no idea what that was...

And then he DID shoot someone. Bane said it.
 
On the script pages leak of the Prologue, the last page clearly shows EXT. GOTHAM so we know the immediate scene after the prologue is a shot of Gotham.!!! And i believe "The Dark Knight theme" plays,

*ALSO, It confirms the location is set in Africa

From MovieWeb.com
PH6t5tH4b6ow8e_1_m.jpg


http://www.movieweb.com/movie/the-dark-knight-rises/PGPzpInbkBMxTR/HHUI4M68gPqc1PP
 
Last edited:
^ He does. I have no idea what that was...

And then he DID shoot someone. Bane said it.
You guys completely missed a lot what was going on. Bane was calling his bluff. "Perhaps he is wondering why you would shoot a man before throwing him off of a plane?" Saying you wouldn't shoot him, you would just toss him off a plane.
 
^ He does. I have no idea what that was...

And then he DID shoot someone. Bane said it.

CIA never shoots anyone, he shoots out of the plane then says "he didn't fly so well" then motions for the guy to get pulled back in. The other two are hooded so they wouldn't know if the guy was shot and thrown out. He was trying to scare them.

Secondly, the other captive gets off the plane with the two guys in black tactical gear, leaving the one to an the fall guy. No pun intended.
 
CIA never shoots anyone, he shoots out of the plane then says "he didn't fly so well" then motions for the guy to get pulled back in. The other two are hooded so they wouldn't know if the guy was shot and thrown out. He was trying to scare them.

Secondly, the other captive gets off the plane with the two guys in black tactical gear, leaving the one to an the fall guy. No pun intended.

which is why bane say's 'or perhaps he's wondering why someone would shoot a man, before throwing him out of a plane', because even though bane can't see what's going on, he can tell cia *****e is bluffing, which just shows how much of a boss bane actually is.
 
which is why bane say's 'or perhaps he's wondering why someone would shoot a man, before throwing him out of a plane', because even though bane can't see what's going on, he can tell cia *****e is bluffing, which just shows how much of a boss bane actually is.

I laughed out loud at that part. :woot:

What the hell is the threat in holding a gun to someone's head when you've already told them you're going to toss them out of the airplane if they don't talk? That really was stupid on the agent's part.
 
It probably will cut straight to Gotham.

And that script is still fake.
 
I laughed out loud at that part. :woot:

What the hell is the threat in holding a gun to someone's head when you've already told them you're going to toss them out of the airplane if they don't talk? That really was stupid on the agent's part.

I guess he can't replicate the sound of throwing someone out the plane door well enough to seemingly scare the others to talk. Unbeknownst to the CIA *****e, these aren't your run of the mill terrorists and Bane quickly points out the illogical nature of using a gun. It's just to show the audience that Bane is not just some dumb brute.
 
So much obvious stuff from the prologue has to be explained to people...Its kind of shocking
 
So much obvious stuff from the prologue has to be explained to people...Its kind of shocking
Hey, give them a break... this is the same general audience that couldn't understand why Batman changed his voice when the first film launched.
 
So much obvious stuff from the prologue has to be explained to people...Its kind of shocking

I agree, it's kinda mind numbing. And it's the same stuff over and over. I understand if you don't get it, but do some quick research and your questions will be answered.

Also the people that argue stuff that is wrong, ie people who don't think its Bruce that ask what it means in the trailer.
 
Where are all the "less exposition" people now?

They need to read through the last few days of post
 
p.s i hope aiden gillen is listed in the credits as cia *****e.
 
The reason why I needed some explaining for that scene was because the prologue went by so fast at IMAX :p

Bane was perfectly understandable though.
 
Where are all the "less exposition" people now?

They need to read through the last few days of post
What exactly are you talking about? Most people I see asking questions, are the ones wanting to know what the blood transfusion was for, because quite frankly, it doesn't really make sense, regardless if there's an overabundance of exposition(which there isn't as far as the transfusion goes). It's an overall silly premise to begin with, one in which has to be glossed over, but at the same time, just doesn't make sense.
 
What exactly are you talking about? Most people I see asking questions, are the ones wanting to know what the blood transfusion was for, because quite frankly, it doesn't really make sense, regardless if there's an overabundance of exposition(which there isn't as far as the transfusion goes). It's an overall silly premise to begin with, one in which has to be glossed over, but at the same time, just doesn't make sense.

I thought it was pretty cool once someone helped me realise what it was for. A mid air transfusion, kinda shows the precision and professionalism of Bane and his team.
 
What exactly are you talking about? Most people I see asking questions, are the ones wanting to know what the blood transfusion was for, because quite frankly, it doesn't really make sense, regardless if there's an overabundance of exposition(which there isn't as far as the transfusion goes). It's an overall silly premise to begin with, one in which has to be glossed over, but at the same time, just doesn't make sense.


The moment I saw the prologue i got what the transfusion was for.

But this i can understand being confusing if not explained.

However when I see a plethora of people inquiring:

"Did the CIA Guy throw someone out of the plane?"

"Why did that guy stay behind?"

"Why do you think Bane said 'for you'?"

It surprises me because these seem to be fairly obvious things from the prologue. The last few days people have been saying Nolan's films have too much exposition but, when you don't explain bluntly that the CIA guy was bluffing a large section of people seem to miss out on it.

Its strange, to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"