I don't think it's a rudimentary problem as much as it is a societal issue, I mean look at superheroes like Iron Man and Batman. Why are they consistently popular? Because they are flawed heroes, and that's perfect for our cynical society, as paradoxical as it sounds.
Superman (as source material) is a reflection of all good that is possible within us, but our mainstream society refuses to accept it because it believes that no one is capable of being that good without ulterior motives. Moreover, you have the superhuman element, which only furthers the ability to relate to him (not that I agree, especially with isolation, outsiders, coming-of-age, and finding a place in an new world are key themes).
That's sort of my point. People love the flawed hero's, sometime the more flawed the better.
Which is why Batman works great today and hell nolan's batman's probably as flawed as any hero can be. As well as the fact he's a man really.
You can argue the same almost for tony stark. Both those guys are 1 and 2 (take your pick) at the box office as super-heros. Hell #3 spider-man is arguably more flawed in the reboot than in the raimi films.
Superman went form the "man of tomorrow" to a man out of our times pretty much.
Which is why Batman works great today and hell nolan's batman's probably as flawed as any hero can be.
Dark Knight is a brilliant comics-to-movie adaptation -- no doubt about it. Having said that, if the media hadn't turned Ledger into some kind of a martyr-like figure, I doubt the film and its follow-up would have been greeted with the same level of critical acclaim it managed to achieve in light of the late actor's demise.
Dark Knight is a brilliant comics-to-movie adaptation -- no doubt about it. Having said that, if the media hadn't turned Ledger into some kind of a martyr-like figure, I doubt the film and its follow-up would have been greeted with the same level of critical acclaim it managed to achieve in light of the late actor's demise.
Brad Bird to the rescue.
Agreed.
Also, I could argue for days about why Superman is one of the most flawed heroes ever created in comics and that's what makes him so integral to the superhero mythos. He's much more flawed than Batman or Iron Man and on more than just one level.
To have the strength and physical capability to do almost anything including dominate a world you inherently don't belong to and instead choose every moment of every day to use that selflessly for the good of humanity. To show compassion instead of aggression. It's pretty symbolic of the ideal many people wish America stood for in the eyes of the world. Doesn't get more relatable nowadays than that.
Are you saying his flaws are his compassion and selflessness?
Hmm no. Not sure where that other fragment went:
And of course he can be made relatable on film you just have to execute it well. The concept of the character hasn't changed. To have the strength and physical capability to do almost anything including dominate a world you inherently don't belong to and instead choose every moment of every day to use that selflessly for the good of humanity. To show compassion instead of aggression. It's pretty symbolic of the ideal many people wish America stood for in the eyes of the world. Doesn't get more relatable nowadays than that.
The cynic in me wants to say he doesn't get points for doing the ethical thing. And given his upbringing by good people his helping humanity is entirely expected.
If he had been found and raised by a couple of white supremacist neo nazis and still went on to help humanity I might would count that as an amazing feat.
...maybe a question of Nature Vs Nurture.
We see in Zod what a non benevolent "god" would do vs what Superman "chooses" to do with these god like powers.
There was a line from one of the animated features, something like:
...imagine what would happen if he ever realized ...
Anybody remember that?
I would have liked Ledger's acting and the film even if he hadn't died so for me personally his death didn't help the franchise but hurt it. Joker is my favorite comic book character and Ledger brought him to life in a way I may not see again. His death was tragic and for me took away from my enjoyment of the film. I still remember the moment and feeling when I realized In the theater what we had lost. It was when Joker is backing out of the kitchen and he kicks the door open backs out lets the door shut and runs off. It was an odd moment because I suddenly remembered this person was dead and the way he exited the scene was such an embodiment of that.
If Supes ain't being dorky, then he must be emo.![]()
Guys (and gals) like us are in a different class altogether though. We appreciate these films on a level those outside of fandom simply can't relate to. I was mostly referring to critics and the general audience. The way society reacts to death and turns ordinary people into martyrs is a very bizarre thing, but that's just how things are. Ledger's death brought a hell of a lot of attention to TDK. His performance was already being talked about, and the news of his death made it something even more special for many; that lauded performance had now become his final act on film. Whereas the Cruise and Holmes romance took the focus away from Batman Begins in the early stages, Ledger's sudden demise did the opposite for the sequel -- it turned TDK into a must see event.
The story takes place in 48 hours? So that means Clarke goes to the fortress and Zod happens to show up after that. Or is Zod's arrival the catalyst for him going to the Fortress? I don't need specifics just some clarity on that point.
Aside from flashbacks that would mean the movie isn't much more than Zod's attack.