G.Godfrey
Sidekick
- Joined
- May 21, 2012
- Messages
- 3,539
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Hello.
Hai.
Hello.

Why not hire Paul Dini as a co-writer?
how long do movies stay in cinemas? a month, 2 ?

I think a lot my issues also stem from this being an origin story, so there's always that much more to nitpick and so much more source material to compare to.
This happened with The Amazing Spider-Man as well. Liked it a lot, but it had too much overlap with the first Spider-Man to give you any sense of something new.
Here's hoping both TASM 2 and MOS 2 have some room to spread their wings and truly fly.
but the problem here is that this origin doesnt give the new kids a superman who alone makes the decision to become the hero......an ideal of hope. he doesnt make alone the choice to save everyone. the new generation got a superhero who gets told from his parents what he can and can not do.
which is IMO what young modern parents are trying to do. they are trying to tell their kids what to do. thats not parenting IMO.
but the problem here is that this origin doesnt give the new kids a superman who alone makes the decision to become the hero......an ideal of hope. he doesnt make alone the choice to save everyone. the new generation got a superhero who gets told from his parents what he can and can not do.
which is IMO what young modern parents are trying to do. they are trying to tell their kids what to do. thats not parenting IMO.
but the problem here is that this origin doesnt give the new kids a superman who alone makes the decision to become the hero......an ideal of hope. he doesnt make alone the choice to save everyone. the new generation got a superhero who gets told from his parents what he can and can not do.
which is IMO what young modern parents are trying to do. they are trying to tell their kids what to do. thats not parenting IMO.
No, his parents did there job and tried to guide him in the best way they could and tried to instill in him there experience and knowledge. In the end however the decision of what he would do was entirely up to him. He needs to decide from all he was taught what he wanted to do and how to apply it. With all the advice and guidance parent need also to show there children how to make good informed decisions on there own using the skills they gave to them.
but the problem here is that this origin doesnt give the new kids a superman who alone makes the decision to become the hero......an ideal of hope. he doesnt make alone the choice to save everyone. the new generation got a superhero who gets told from his parents what he can and can not do.
which is IMO what young modern parents are trying to do. they are trying to tell their kids what to do. thats not parenting IMO.
but the problem here is that this origin doesnt give the new kids a superman who alone makes the decision to become the hero......an ideal of hope. he doesnt make alone the choice to save everyone. the new generation got a superhero who gets told from his parents what he can and can not do.
which is IMO what young modern parents are trying to do. they are trying to tell their kids what to do. thats not parenting IMO.
Did you miss the part where Clark Kent uses his powers to help in defiance of his father's beliefs?
The whole idea that Kal/Clark doesn't do what he chooses to do for his own reasons flies in the face (pun intended to some degree) of one of the best lines of dialogue from the movie itself (as some have taken it as a sig, even):
What if a child dreamed of becoming something other than what society had intended? What if a child aspired to something greater?
Surely I can't be the only one that sees that, right?

Was that line in the movie? I forget things.![]()