TeeKay
Avenger
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2013
- Messages
- 14,367
- Reaction score
- 700
- Points
- 73
But in SR Superman made choices that were much stupider and more destructive than in MOS, and the critics gave it a much higher rating.
In SR, Superman leaves earth, thus allowing a mass-murdering criminal to be released from prison. True, the way it happened does not correspond with how our legal system works, but obviously in SR they are in an alternate world, where key witnesses need to be present for appeals. Superman would clearly know this (and if he does not, he is clearly negligent), thus he should not leave earth. Thus, all the problems after Luthor's release can be blamed on Superman. Then there is his being a deadbeat Dad and abandoning the woman he loves.
In MOS, some seem to say "Superman should have taken the fighting out of Metropolis". Besides the fact that the only way they suggest doing this is the open Metropolis to mass drestruction of Superman II, they are missing the main cause of desctruction in Metropolis. Metropolis was not mainly leveled by the Superman/Zod fight. The main cause of the destruction, and the only cause of death is the World Engine beam. Superman goes to fight and destroy it as fast as he can. He acts expeditiously to save humans.
Yeah but Supes tackled Zod through a building/gas station to go fight him in populated areas

[YT]8KAzRHDdI5o[/YT]
she close the door to protect the dog not to run across smth... talking about stupid arguments about costner hurt is that you don't care for human life... videogames have affected your mind... The way he dies is the way he needed not the best... sacrifing his life for his son converting in the hero the world needs... if the tornado doesn't look like the movie twister is bad designed... tornado experts that don't know that not all the tornadoes look the same...


t:



