- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 70,159
- Reaction score
- 189
- Points
- 73
Malus said:Have to agree. Movie Thing looks very little like the beloved comics icon.
He does somewhat resemble the Thing of approx. issues 4-15, but that's it. So while I've sort of made my peace with what we got in FF1, I won't be happy with FF2 if all we get is more of the same.
Ben should definitely evolve further towards the decidedly more unhuman proportions he took on in the FF's heyday. If for no other reason than he needs a fresh reason to hate being the Thing. This can only enhance Chiklis' performance as we experience his horror at mutating further, his humanity seemingly slipping away.
Anyone who has been paying attention to what Hollywood FX shops have been able to achieve in recent years know that this is possible.
I give a big to Michael Chiklis' performance. Her's perfect.
But as a lifelong FF and Kirby fan, I can only give a firm to the half-assed Thing make-up of FF1.
Thing and Wilhelm, you guys need to reel in the attitudes. You're both gonna get put in time out if you keep it up.
Thing, when you question a fan's devotion (and respect for KIRBY, for God's sake!) because they don't like the FF1 Thing, that's just obnoxious. You're not fighting any kind of good fight there.
And Wilhelm, I may agree with you, but resorting to name-calling over this just makes you look bad. The pics you chose and your rightful indignation more than made your point.
yeah the name-calling was uncalled for, but yes Thingy needs to not question someone's devotion to a comic...thats not for us to do...the proof is in the pics...nothing deniable there...is deniable a word????