am i the only one that...

Okay maybe what I should have said was "300 won't be as epic in the BO"

Ah that I completely agree mate , but I'm not really caring either , after all it is a R movie , if it makes 300 millions Worldwide , I'll be already extremely happy , and I'm sure it will be considered a sucess
 
Smith doesn't do stand-up, he does very funny speaking tours, but the guys really not a comedian. As far as being a LOTR fan, anythings possible, and it wouldn't be the first time he was known for slagging something he's a fan of.
 
Kevin Smith doesn't hate Lord of The Rings, he just likes it:

Star Wars fan Randall also teases Elias about his love of Lord of the Rings. In the George Lucas versus Peter Jackson debate, Kevin Smith sides with Randall. But this time, there's no analysis of the contracting issues in Hobbiton. "I mean, in order to come up with that minutiae study, you would have to be more dialed into the Rings movies than I was. I liked 'em, I thought they were really well made, but it just didn't speak to me as much as Star Wars did. But then, Star Wars I saw when I was a kid so I was way more dialed into it."

http://actionfilmscomedies.suite101.com/article.cfm/kevin_smith_on_clerks_ii
 
Well, from a visual standpoint (from the little I've seen revealed in the trailer), it has its moments. I've mixed feeling about the strange combo of cg stuff melding with actual people. The overall color palette is also a little odd for my tastes though some shots work extrememly well, evoking artists Frank Frazetta and Jeff Jones. The fantasy elements are a real turn-off for me, seeing this is based on a real historical event rather than Jason And The Argonauts. Has anyone seen the orignal movie based on the same storry, "300 Spartans" starrring Richard Egan? It was damn good.
 
I'm guessing this movie is going to suck. I won't even bother to see it in theatres - I may or may not check it out on DVD.

Early reviews have claimed that this film is about 80% slow motion, so it's not like the trailer is really lying in that regard. Nevermind how silly everything is (there's a warrior with swords for arms... am I supposed to think that's cool?).

and everyone who said it was dumb for me to think this based on the trailer can now shut up.
 
and everyone who said it was dumb for me to think this based on the trailer can now shut up.


Um, right now 95% of people here think it's going to be cool, with the slo-mo and Sword arm guy and everything. Unless this board is flooded with "Slo-mo and Created-for-the-movie characters suck" Fanboys over the next month, your still the Minority.
 
I doubt it's 80% slow mo.

You're telling me the dialogue will be in slo-mo too?
 
TTThhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiissssssss iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisssssssssssssss Ssssssssssssspppppppaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrttttttttttttaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
 
Um, right now 95% of people here think it's going to be cool, with the slo-mo and Sword arm guy and everything. Unless this board is flooded with "Slo-mo and Created-for-the-movie characters suck" Fanboys over the next month, your still the Minority.
It's not about slow-mo sucking, it's about an overabundance of slow-mo. And as far as the sword-arm guy character goes, it's not that he was created for the movie, it's that having a character with swords for arms is lame. It's like the kind of "cool bad guy" a ten-year-old would come up with.

Mr. Socko said:
You're telling me the dialogue will be in slo-mo too?
There's not that much dialogue in 300.

However, it is probably an exaggeration, but the point of the reviewer (who on the whole liked 300, just wasn't thinking it was a masterpiece) is that it relies on slow-mo far too much, and that most of the battle scenes are done in slow-mo shots.
 
That's exactly what it looks and is sucky.

Yeah. That's my point. The PSP is a terrible device and pretty much this game won't exsist in my mind. So there's nothing to be upset about because the game doesn't exsist.
 
I know I'm dissapointed there isn't a studio sponcered game for the next gen Systems.
 
I know I'm dissapointed there isn't a studio sponcered game for the next gen Systems.

Yeah, it is definitely disappointing. Oh well. At least the movie looks very promising.
 
... thinks this movie is going to blow hitler... in a bad way?

i mean, it looks cool as hell... and really, that's about it.

waaaay too much "cool" slow motion, and waaaay too much yelling. and that's just in the trailers.

i could be wrong, but i honestly don't think i am. i guess we'll see.

They should do an entire movie in slo-motion.
That'd drive people crazy.
 
No no. Some people would.

Someone, out there.

I mean, who saw Epic Movie?

"People" would see it.

:csad:
 
If this movie ends up being "80% cool slo-mo", I'll eat my underwear and yours too.
Seriously, that's one of the DUMBEST thing I've ever heard in my life, how the hell are they going to release a movie that's almost entirely in slow motion? That reviewer is either a ****** or is exaggerating.
Come on, people. Think before you post.
Jesus Christ.
 
Gerald Butler running around in a speedo killing mother****ers for 2 hours straight....

Could it get much better?
that is both the least gay and gayest post i've come across in a long time. :oldrazz:

Um, right now 95% of people here think it's going to be cool, with the slo-mo and Sword arm guy and everything. Unless this board is flooded with "Slo-mo and Created-for-the-movie characters suck" Fanboys over the next month, your still the Minority.
just you wait. it'll happen. :o
it always does.

I doubt it's 80% slow mo.

You're telling me the dialogue will be in slo-mo too?
people + internet = death of logical thinking.
it's both a mathematical and scientific fact.

No no. Some people would.

Someone, out there.

I mean, who saw Epic Movie?

"People" would see it.

:csad:
i still can't believe people PAID to watch Epic Movie. :csad: :huh:
 
... thinks this movie is going to blow hitler... in a bad way?

i mean, it looks cool as hell... and really, that's about it.

waaaay too much "cool" slow motion, and waaaay too much yelling. and that's just in the trailers.

i could be wrong, but i honestly don't think i am. i guess we'll see.
It looks amazing. I'm expecting and hoping the film can match up to the looks but from experience anything can happen. I hope you're wrong on this.

You're telling me the dialogue will be in slo-mo too?
Haha.

just you wait. it'll happen. :o
it always does.
Yeah, I'm growing immune to it.
 
... thinks this movie is going to blow hitler... in a bad way?

i mean, it looks cool as hell... and really, that's about it.

waaaay too much "cool" slow motion, and waaaay too much yelling. and that's just in the trailers.

i could be wrong, but i honestly don't think i am. i guess we'll see.

I think the trailer was very badly put together. I don't know about the movie, but the trailer made it look like it was going to blow.
 
No one can say this film will "blow Hitler"

What are you comparing it to? Has there ever been a movie like 300 that sucked?

Something epic and very stylized.....I can really only think of LOTR..that didnt suck...so really if we are going to make early assumptions about the movie based off the trailer then we have to base them on how a similar movie turned out. LOTR turned out quite good.

300= Matrix+LOTR

That is absolutely ridiculous.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,267
Messages
22,076,163
Members
45,875
Latest member
Pducklila
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"