My only question about SR is, wont' people notice when Clark left, Superman left? And when Superman Returned, Clark returned?
lol, well........disbelief suspensed...
It was also a plot hole in BB.
Which one, the returning part?
Which was also a plot hole in BB. Hell, at least in SR, Ma Kent and Jimmy are estatic to see Clark back. Bruce Wayne got no such reception in BB. Not that I minded greatly.
Well, Alfred cared. Rachel care. His return did make an impact on on Wayne Enterprises as well, and his return was announced on the front of newspapers. He actually did get alot of lovin', although Earle's was obviously Bull****.....but, hey...it's the thought that counts.
To explain myself in reply: that's why I said "except alfred." cuz He already knew... I don't really get where your going with that, friend.
Well, just that we didn't actually see Alfred wondering is all. We didn't see anyone wondering at all, that's all I'm pointing out. We don't see Gotham at all when Bruce is away.
But...the adapted novel kinda covers that, it's a nice read.
He was declared dead though. It's actually all over the news, a dead guy returning from the grave. I'd expect someone to wonder where he was all that time but it just never happened for whatever reason.
Well, we don't know when exactly it happened. My guess, since Earle's making his move once Bruce returns, that he returns immediately after being declared dead- and plays the dumb rich boy card. I think it's just something people could fill the blanks on they're own though.
ok. but forgive me, I can't stop myself from challenging that a little by saying I've never witness don diego being declared dead and then returning while some zorro guy makes an appearance some time later. Did this happen to don too?
Well, he wasn't declared dead.....but he did make a kind of journey.
The other thing is that his money could really help cover his tracks on this, even having to go back and create one.
Playing the party boy having fun card, easy like pie.
what would it be? I'm not yet sold on the idea that not one person gave a second thought about clark's five year soul searching journey somehow possibly being linked to superman's, or even them both returning in about the same week/month of time. I'm Not sure though about all the details. I haven't seen it yet, I might just go see it today.
Yeah, me neither.......the reason I say you COULD give a better argument against SR (I haven't seen the film yet, so I'll get back to you on this after tomorrow) b/c he works in a news room....around 2 great reporters, Lois and Perry, and then there's Jimmy-boy who takes all the pics.....my argument would be that those people should be able to put 2 and 2 together.
But, again....I only THINK you can give that argument, but I'll let you guys know after I watch the movie.
Indeed, my good man. Now you make me wonder how accurate begins is in representing the myth's story.
Pretty on the money, actually. I did prefer the BEGINS one, b/c there could be no trails whatsoever to his journey. He went on the travel with no money, without leaning on his family name, essentially living like a bum and fighting to survive. I think in that respect, it trumps the story last (it might be retconned, but....who the **** knows anymore...) story of the myth.
Wait.
What kind of sausages....?