HaplessHenchman
Goon for hire
- Joined
- May 28, 2014
- Messages
- 2,290
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31

I'm on Team Cap.
That story smells too much like Warner PR Jedis working their magic. They try to disqualify the critics.
Mjölnir;33292707 said:Oh, we're back to disrespecting people that think differently about the movie again? Classy.
Who knows, maybe critics are just cranky about CBMs right now and will do the same to.CW, albeit to a lesser degree. Doubtful, but you never know.
Not likely. I actually read the reviews to BvS and then read what they said about Age of Ultron. Critics are VERY forgiving to Marvel films. Many skeptics will say, they aren't Marvel biased and there is no conspiracy, but some of these critics actually outright say they can forgive Marvel more or just outright say, don't bother with DC and just watch Marvel. Whatever the case, you'll see a lot of Age of Ultron reviews that say..."There are flaws, but the flaws can be forgiven because they kept teasing Thor." The articles says critics have become less than professional. Watch the movie and read the reviews to make up your own mind. I saw flaws in BvS. I saw fire coming from the eyes of some critics.
I respect the ones that have something negative to say and it be meaningful. Criticism such as using two actors to play Bruce Wayne's dad is just a daft criticism by somebody that was either blind or a really confused individual.
Also, there's criticism that Lois Lane had to be psychic for her to know what to do in the last act. For some reason, a journalist with more than half a brain can't be given the credit to think a situation through...
Not all criticism is bad, but reading a good portion of the RT critics...I'm not sure they watched the movie with their eyes open...let alone their minds open.
You got a link to those specific reviews? Now I'm really curious...I respect the ones that have something negative to say and it be meaningful. Criticism such as using two actors to play Bruce Wayne's dad is just a daft criticism by somebody that was either blind or a really confused individual.
Also, there's criticism that Lois Lane had to be psychic for her to know what to do in the last act. For some reason, a journalist with more than half a brain can't be given the credit to think a situation through...
Not all criticism is bad, but reading a good portion of the RT critics...I'm not sure they watched the movie with their eyes open...let alone their minds open.
I don't know about that. Some of these critics made some important points.
1. First of all, Snyder used too many Oscar winners.
2. The film is too long with too many characters. Age of Ultron was forgiven because it had heroes teasing each other.
3. Snyder made a confusingly messy film. Why show a seen in which Bruce Wayne's father dies and then follow it up with another scene with Bruce Wayne's father being alive, in the present, played by a different actor?
This gives me a ton of faith in the critics. They were able to see the glaring holes. I don't think Bruce's father being alive was a nitpick, but a truly perceptive observation...even though I didn't see it in my viewing.
Nothing big is coming out next weekend except maybe Midnight Special.
I don't think he was being serious...1. So what?
2. It had no more characters than MoS did with similar screen times.
3. WTF are you on about? The next scene is him talking to an employee at his office over the phone during the attack on Metropolis.
The idea that critics tearing it a new one made people go see the movie is ridiculous and unfounded. If that were the case FFINO and Green Lantern would have been a rousing success. People are seeing it because it's Batman and Superman.
I don't think he was being serious...
Batman v Superman can still reach 1 Billion. Also seeing it for a third time next Friday!t:
I'm going to go for my second viewing either this coming Friday or Saturday. I'm as pumped as you are.t:
And yes, $1 billion was always still on the table for BvS. My high end projection of $1.7 billion may not exactly come to pass, but it can still reach around $1.1-$1.4 billion, which is still just as awesome.
Wait wait wait, now people are saying the negative critic reactions are making people want to see the film? Just like they did with F4 right?