Saint said:This is dumb. You are literally the only person I have ever met who has tried to argue batman does not wear lenses (contact or otherwise), noting of course that I haven't read htis entire topic and some other poor soul may have made the same ridiculous argument. In any case, continuity facts + common sense = Batman wears lenses. The saddest thing is that you dismiss our "few examples" even though they vastly outweigh your zero examples..
Saint said:I never said I want lenses on film. Ninety percent of the lense manips look dumb.
Slick, it doesn't matter what silly explainations you've concocted. The comics state they are lenses, so it doesn't matter what YOU think. More importantly, I am not talking about "other characters" with the white eye look. I am talking about Batman, who wears lenses. Your argument is just silly, very much like those people who argue thast Batman doesn't wear body armour, despite the explicit statements in the comics to the contrary. Sure, in the seventies it could have been assumed that the white eyes were artistic license, just like it was accepted that Batman wore spandex. But we are not in the seventies. In 2006, Batman wears lenses and there's really not argument against that.Super_Ludacris said:This nulls your argument look back and you'll see why I say the white eye look cant be lenses even if a few cases it has shown otherwise and myself others gave examples plus used other characters who have the same eye look. Oh dear...
You're wrong, that's why. It doesn't matter if you think they "don't work." I don't think heat vision "works," but that doesn't prevent Superman from having it.Then why argue for the sake of arguing? lol... I too see peoples points but I've calmly explained why it dont work even if they put up a good case.
Boom said:Super, I'd like to point out that you're the only one in this topic who refuses to believe that Batman wears lenses in the comics.
Doesn't that tell you something?
Super_Ludacris said:Fanboy-someone who gets upset easily or has gotta be grouchy about it.
A fan-Keeps it chill and considers all sides.
Like I said in my posts, the whole debate over the white eye look is something that goes beyond Batman, because it seems like a lot of animated characters have it but never really bothered to explain whether they were lenses or an artistic touch to show intimidation (early TMNT anyone?) but even with the explination when you weigh up both sides it just. feels. forced. You argued your point well but putting an animated look on a live action character seems forced, hence why we've see there's road block on every reason for it.
Fair?

batmaluco said:Why to use lenses when we have Christian Bale? We can get the best of both worlds...
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
There's no need to worry because theres nothing to worry about, especially for a billionaire CEO vigilante whose company dabbles in exotic defense contracts. The fact is; fogging is no longer an issue in this modern age, for example:ragdus said:Yeah, and he'd also probably find it cumbersome to fight his way through the fog that develops on the inside of the lenses (which incidently would be impossible to wipe off without taking his mask off) as he generates massive amounts of contained heat and moisture while fighing inside that suit.
But hey, I mean why worry about that?
What these shots show is that the white eye look actually works pretty well (which comes as a bit of a surprise to me). But having said that, these are still images and single frame caps that do not represent the look of the moving figure, i.e., what you see in these pics is not readily apparent in the filmits just a trick of the eyesRonny Shade said:nice caps/shots batmaluco
Saint said:Slick, it doesn't matter what silly explainations you've concocted. The comics state they are lenses, so it doesn't matter what YOU think. More importantly, I am not talking about "other characters" with the white eye look. I am talking about Batman, who wears lenses. Your argument is just silly, very much like those people who argue thast Batman doesn't wear body armour, despite the explicit statements in the comics to the contrary. Sure, in the seventies it could have been assumed that the white eyes were artistic license, just like it was accepted that Batman wore spandex. But we are not in the seventies. In 2006, Batman wears lenses and there's really not argument against that..
Saint said:You're wrong, that's why. It doesn't matter if you think they "don't work." I don't think heat vision "works," but that doesn't prevent Superman from having it

Super_Ludacris said:So like I said before, if in the 70's as you said it wasnt implied or it was assumed he did not wear lenses then what's the point? (that's like a whole 40 years backlog). We're saying recently he wore lenses? Ok I'll take a bite at that, but then only people who have been hard core Batman fans would know that. Immeadietly, the causal fan is gonna look at the white lenses and be like.
And yeah, loads of people are gonna use other characters as example like it or not. It's just the natural way people are gonna connect things. And let's keep it real people the WB and Nolan are gonna have the exact same reservations towards including the white lenses. It goes back to the same point: It feels FORCED..
Superman's heat vision is such a basic trait to the character that it's obvious. In Batman's case because the white lenses have never been detailed to the extent of being a basic trait (as exemplified by there lack of apperance in all his live-action incarnations) it's not needed and again the average fan will think it's over-bearing.
Fair? No Question.![]()
Except, of course, for the fact that white eyelets have been part of the Batman archetypein one form or anothersince his inception in 1939! Supermans heat vision, on the other hand, was a later addition that did not become a distinct trait until the 1960's, some twenty years after that characters origin.Super_Ludacris said:Superman's heat vision is such a basic trait to the character that it's obvious. In Batman's case... the white lenses have never been detailed to the extent of being a basic trait