Due to recent news involving X, formerly Twitter and its owner, the staff of SuperHeroHype have decided it would be best to no longer allow links on the board. Starting January 31st, users will no longer be able to post direct links to X on this site, however screenshots will still be allowed as long as they follow Hype rules and guidelines. We apologize for any inconvenience.
According to IGN, it's Catwoman's
emergence that brings Batman back into action. Their sources claim that Catwoman is a vigilante who steps in to replace Batman.
What if she rips off mob dealers, stealing money from the Falcone family, until Alberto decides to place a bounty on her head, just like The Roman did in TLH. Now, she's hunted by both the mob and the cops, like Batman, which forces him to step in. What do you think?
They were prob told if anyone asks what were scouting for, tell them its a hideout for Robin. We often see scouting and preproduction work given false names.
If its a hideout, its prob for Bane or Catwoman.
Oh, yeah, I loved him in that too. I don't get the complaints with him, like the scene where he skis off the skyscraper. It's slapstick; it's not meant to be taken seriously. Sadly, slapstick doesn't seem to be something many people have a stomach for anymore. I like Superman 3 for it's pulpy, cheesy factor, but Superman 2 just makes me roll my eyes with how horrid it is. It's not nearly as bad as Superman 4, but it's nothing memorable. Almost every scene makes me laugh unintentionally, like a movie Mystery Science Theater 3000 would have watched. I wish those guys would do a Rifftrax of it. The only part I like a lot is the subplot between Lois Lane and Superman, about how he loves her enough to give in to mortality.Just you and Richard Pryor.
Read the full interview.
It's a transcript from a Q&A that was held recently when Nolan received the Modern Master award. The interview is real.
Just you and Richard Pryor.
I think the twist is that Secret is Richard Pryor.![]()
Fine, pick on me. Go ahead. Here's my lunch money while you're at it.
Can someone tell me why the heck Batman would stop being active after TDK?
Can someone tell me why the heck Batman would stop being active after TDK?
To lay low until the cops ease up.
Or maybe Bane breaks his back. Etc.
No, forget Bane, I mean right after TDK ends and before TDKR begins. Lay low? In TDK, the screenwriters went out of their way to say how Batman has no limits and how he would endure all the pressure. It was building up to his final decision to take the blame for Dent's murders. And all of that just to retire? No, it directly contradicts what they're trying to do with the character.
No, forget Bane, I mean right after TDK ends and before TDKR begins. Lay low? In TDK, the screenwriters went out of their way to say how Batman has no limits and how he would endure all the pressure. It was building up to his final decision to take the blame for Dent's murders. And all of that just to retire? No, it directly contradicts what they're trying to do with the character.
I think the writers will use the build-up as an opportunity for Bane to show Batman that, yeah, he has limits.
Lay low for a little while so as not to be apprehended =/= Retire.
Also, people have been suggesting that the movie starts with Bane having broken his back. I don't think it's a good idea, frankly, but you asked.
Yeah, but that IGN report implies that he has stopped being Batman, since it says that CW brings him back to action.
Oh, I really have no idea what IGN are on about.![]()
And if I remember right, she did hate Bane later on.
And, as it's been said already, she took it up to Azrael as well.
Nolan mentioned Tim Burton's Batman movies in previous interviews. It's not odd at all.
Oh, yeah, I loved him in that too. I don't get the complaints with him, like the scene where he skis off the skyscraper. It's slapstick; it's not meant to be taken seriously. Sadly, slapstick doesn't seem to be something many people have a stomach for anymore. I like Superman 3 for it's pulpy, cheesy factor, but Superman 2 just makes me roll my eyes with how horrid it is. It's not nearly as bad as Superman 4, but it's nothing memorable. Almost every scene makes me laugh unintentionally, like a movie Mystery Science Theater 3000 would have watched. I wish those guys would do a Rifftrax of it. The only part I like a lot is the subplot between Lois Lane and Superman, about how he loves her enough to give in to mortality.
RUMOR: The TDKR crew is searching for Robin's lair!
some people think:
![]()
No, forget Bane, I mean right after TDK ends and before TDKR begins. Lay low? In TDK, the screenwriters went out of their way to say how Batman has no limits and how he would endure all the pressure. It was building up to his final decision to take the blame for Dent's murders. And all of that just to retire? No, it directly contradicts what they're trying to do with the character.
I don't go to Superman 3 as my first choice for a slapstick fix, I just don't mind the slapstick in it.To be fair, there are a lot better slapstick comedy out there than what can be found in Superman III. Seriously, some of Adam West's Batman had better slapstick moments, with a flavor of camp thrown in. I hate it when directors equate 'children entertainment' to slapstick almost automatically. It's not always like that you know.