AVEITWITHJAMON
Badass Cloud
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 42,273
- Reaction score
- 7,701
- Points
- 103
I get it. When I updated my signature I had to debate between AoU and CW, which some people might not be able to wrap their head around, haha. But really as much as I like CW and loved the inclusion of Spider-Man, it's kind of like watching mom and dad split up. Which is still brewing in AoU, but we get to see the Avengers put their own quarrels aside to...you know...avenge or whatever.
I'm personally looking forward to seeing Shocker a bit more than Vulture as well. Even though all things considered he is probably even more lame than the Vulture, Herman Schultz just lucked out that a better outfit was drawn for him. I mean, almost every Spider-Man villian has had liberties taken with them, some for better some for worse, I would say not one villain has been adapted 100% accurately in that franchise (in any franchise?), besides mmmaybe DaFoe's Norman Osborn. Or course a Spider-Man villain should provide more than just some great action scenes, but I think the visual variety Vulture offers compared to what we've seen already in the previous 5 movies was a big reason for settling on him. They can rework him into a more compelling character just like Otto Octavius.
Personally I'm holding out for Mysterio.
Glad it's not just me with Shocker and Vulture. I actually don't think Vulture is that visually appealing either. I think Scorpion would have been a much better pick. Kraven is another one as well.