cRookie_Monster
Former DBZ music arranger
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
Perhaps even more worth noting in reference to this particular situation, Bach was also a master of practicality. If only certain instrumentalists were available to him to play a piece scored for another set of instruments, he would rearrange the previous piece to suit the resources he was given. You adapt to what you have. If the rock music youre composing doesnt function well with the textures of a synthesizer, consider writing in a more content-centered style. Even in traditional orchestration, you always tailor the way you write to the advantages and disadvantages of each instrument. The synthesizers are just another set of instruments.
Now there I agree completely. The term used in the the field is writing "idiomatically", writing music that works for the instruments you have. And I think that was not done well in the Faulconer studio. I don't think the right MIDI sounds were chosen in many many cases and I don't think they were handled properly in a lot of cases. Mostly just cause the main synthesizer was particularly bad at orchestral instruments.
On the other hand, I don't think Bach is known for his orchestration techniques. His stuff was usually pretty simple timbre-wise. Now, later guys like Rimsky-Korsakov, Holst, and Straninsky....THATS ORCHESTRATION!
t:
(me being uber cheap constant labor)