Not really. It actually isn't at all ... especially compared to a "Mr. Freeze".
No, Nolan hasn't established anything.
Then what has he done? I'm sure a vast majority of people would disagree. Let alone people w/ taste.
Miller's Batman is **** to me.
That's nice.
I wasn't talking about characterization, I was talking about setting. Which when placing Mr. Freeze in a similar world, would stick out like a sore thumb and take you directly out of the story.
BTW, I didn't just mention Miller's work. Hate those other artists, as well?
As for him creating the most realistic and visceral city; That's good why exactly?
Do I really need to explain?
Because why would there be a need for a Batman if he didn't live in the most disgusting, corrupt, and seedy city imaginable? Also, by making it a realistic threatning setting, it's relatable to an audience so the dangers within the story feel legitimate, so there is actual concern for the protagonist. It actually feels as if the odds are stacked against the hero, thus a higher feeling of reward when the protagonist triumphs.
Batman isn't in the real world.
Sure he is ... and all the best Batman stories have him smack right dab in the most recognizable of worlds.
And Nolan's Gotham wasn't anymore frightening than Burton's or Schumacher's.
Surely it is ...
Shumacher and Burton's Gotham are overdone. One way or the other. One trying to be too frightening, the other, not at all.
Nolan's Gotham is reality, but on steroids. Tell me this, do you live in a major city? If you do ... go to lets say ... Chinatown past 11:30 at night. When all the street trash and crime is thrown up from the underground onto the street. Surrounded by dimly lighted claustrophobic architexture. Then tell me, if you're frightened or not.
Nolan's Gotham replicates that feeling. Burton and Shumacher's Gotham are overly fantastical. No audience member would ever encounter living or being in such a fantasy land. Nolan's Gotham has real threat, through recognizable visuals, feels, and context.
Like Burton's Gotham is German Expressionism. It's supposed to be hell on earth, but where do the people live that supress the people of Gotham? The rich corrupt have to have decedant places to live and bask in the wealth they have starved from their people. We get that in Nolan's Gotham. Which then in terms balances out and makes the actual crime infested slums and un-inhabitable parts of Gotham even more frightening, because we see the difference within context.
And with a realistic setting, threats from the obstacles our beloved characters face (Jim Gordon, Alfred, Bruce Wayne, Harvey Dent, etc.) feel all the more real, thus making the audience more invested in the story.