It's starting to irk me how the answer to all movie problems now seems to be, "Let's reboot it and make it darker." They don't all need it. 'Batman' and 'James Bond' were franchises that did need a fresh start, but Batman already had four movies under his belt and James Bond had 20 (if I remember correctly). Have moviemakers lost their creativity? Is it so much to ask to try to fix any problems the first movie had in the sequel? 'Daredevil', which I do love (but admit has its faults), is not a movie that needs a reboot. I might give it to a different director, but keep the cast. They were all fine, even Affleck.
Things to fix in the sequel:
- More focus on Matt as a person/lawyer (which the Director's Cut did improve A LOT ON.
- Less wire-fu fights.
- There's probably a few more that I can't think of....
That being said, if they're gonna recast one person, they should just recast them all. I hate when one person changes and we're supposed to accept that they have been there for each movie just because they are with the original cast (ie. Maggie Gyllenhaal and now Don Cheadle).
Overall, I guess it wouldn't be horrible if they pulled an Incredible Hulk (after all, THAT movie was light years better than Ang Lee's attempt), but I think that there is a lot of untapped potential in the Daredevil franchise that has already been set in place. With the right director and writers, a sequel could be great. I think, ideally, it would great to see the rights gfo back to Marvel and have them produce the sequel, but the likelihood of that happening is pretty much zero.