Daredevil reboot: official discussion thread

Should Fox reboot Daredevil or make a sequel???

  • Reboot

  • Sequel

  • Who gives a F***

  • Reboot

  • Sequel

  • Who gives a F***

  • Reboot

  • Sequel

  • Who gives a F***

  • Reboot

  • Sequel

  • Who gives a F***

  • Reboot

  • Sequel

  • Who gives a F***


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
ummm i never said you couldn't.. i just implied that DD has already met all of them before.. (elektra though arleady dead) but... doesnt mean she couldnt come back

sounds overly convoluted for the sake of trying to connect it to the events of the original movie. The only thing that should be montaged like TIH is the bit seeing his father fight, be a thug, get his powers, and test his powers
 
sounds overly convoluted for the sake of trying to connect it to the events of the original movie. The only thing that should be montaged like TIH is the bit seeing his father fight, be a thug, get his powers, and test his powers

not really... i dont see whats wrong with just showing that he's been in a fight with KP and BE in the past.. that way we don't have to have another "first fight" is all.. And i personally think another "death of elektra" story arch would be kinda lame.. sure theres ways to go about it.. if they wanted to some how make it more of a mystery.. but u'd have to tweak the story a bit. I just dont see a point in rehashing it, i thought it was told pretty well
 

Just imagine the small bit with Fox is actually Fox playing Daredevil. Oh yeah and the ninja dude could be like the Hand or something.

Works for me.:csad:


gah, you make me glad i didn't pay money to see that movie...
 
We will never get good marvel movies from FOX with Rothman at the wheel... He's just interested in a reboot after hulk and batman... but mostly because the DD rights are almost up and he doesn't want to lose them.
 
Here is official confirmation that Rothman wants to reboot Daredevil.


http://www.aintitcool.com/node/38611

not to mention TR just said he's thinking about it... and said it could take a while.. (well guess what he doesnt have a lot of time due to the rights almost being up)

it wouldn't surprise me if they pass and give it back to marvel to be honest.
 
The line going dark makes me laugh..
 
Rothman said we won't do it for the sake of doing it? What utter BS coming from him :down
 
I would only be game for a daredevil reboot if marvel had control like Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk. Too much has happened for me to trust fox.
 
I would only be game for a daredevil reboot if marvel had control like Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk. Too much has happened for me to trust fox.

I'm just hoping that the next Daredevil movie will end up being like the Incredible Hulk. Marvel Studios making it and 20th Century Fox distributing it. Same with Fantastic Four.
 
I'm just hoping that the next Daredevil movie will end up being like the Incredible Hulk. Marvel Studios making it and 20th Century Fox distributing it. Same with Fantastic Four.

That's what i've suggested too in the past. It'll probably never happen though.:(
 
It can always be a small budget project, directed by.........................FRANK MILLER! :funny:
 
IESB interview w/Rothman

Rothman says the studio is serious about doing another movie featuring Marvel's man without fear, and they're going to be doing it "soon". However, he also cautioned that "soon" in Hollywood time can be a bit like dog years.

"We've got all the rights. And yes, I think that the thing the 'Hulk' showed although, it did what it did, is that it is possible, that if you really do it right the audience will give you a second chance," Rothman said about the prospect of revisiting a franchise that had underperformed. "That it is possible. And I think that you see that when they did 'Batman Begins', the first Nolan movie, that you can have made some mistakes along the way or movies that the audience wasn't that crazy about and then given the proper amount of time and the right creative vision behind it, you can, to use your word, reboot."

Rothman also cautioned that, while invoking 'The Dark Knight' and Christopher Nolan, he's referring to intent rather than tone.

"Would [the new 'Daredevil'] be as dark? I don't know because what it really needs is, it needs a visionary at the level that Chris Nolan was. It needs someone, it needs a director, honestly, who has a genuine vision," Rothman said. "What we wouldn't do is just do it for the sake of doing it. Right? What we try to do is to get a creative engine for it, that really had a great vision for it, that's what we would look for."
 
LOL. Loads of bs in that IESB article.

Tom Rothman said:
it needs a visionary at the level that Chris Nolan was. It needs someone, it needs a director, honestly, who has a genuine vision.
Like he cares.
 
woah, Tom Rothman is a member of the Hype!






:oldrazz: :funny:
 
Rothman should have noticed Fox wasn't involved in making TIH.

He may talk like he understands the theory of why TDK worked, which I agree with, but he's proven he has no intent on using it in his super-hero adaptions.
 
Plus, doing the same thing that Nolan did with TDK does not assure the same kind of success/profit
 
Plus, doing the same thing that Nolan did with TDK does not assure the same kind of success/profit

Depends on what they're adapting. With Daredevil it could work but not with FF.

Not that Fox could ever successfully replicate TDK's theory with Rothman in charge.
 
not to mention TR just said he's thinking about it... and said it could take a while.. (well guess what he doesnt have a lot of time due to the rights almost being up)

it wouldn't surprise me if they pass and give it back to marvel to be honest.
That might be a good idea marvel movies have become better ever since marvel has had more control in making there movies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"