But other than that, 3D is pretty cool, right bro?F&$K 3-D, and F#$K people who pay to see movies in 3-D
Very valid point. Nolan's traditional at heart, and I doubt he'll be switching to digital anytime soon. Not worried either way though, I doubt 3D (native or not) would do much for Nolan's directorial style.Doubtful they'll film in 3D, as it would have to be filmed digitally, which I believe Nolan has expressed an aversion to.
But other than that, 3D is pretty cool, right bro?
Very valid point. Nolan's traditional at heart, and I doubt he'll be switching to digital anytime soon. Not worried either way though, I doubt 3D (native or not) would do much for Nolan's directorial style.
My only concern is they won't make any IMAX 2D screens available.
But other than that, 3D is pretty cool, right bro?
Very valid point. Nolan's traditional at heart, and I doubt he'll be switching to digital anytime soon. Not worried either way though, I doubt 3D (native or not) would do much for Nolan's directorial style.
My only concern is they won't make any IMAX 2D screens available.
Science Fiction and Fantasy movies in 3D - Acceptable
Crime Drama - UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NO!
So....Batman jumping off that huge skyscraper (shot from above with the ground disappearing into the depths), gliding through the air amongst the rooftops, zipping through alleyways and even building lobbies on the Batpod, chasing cars and trucks through tunnels and underpasses shot at ground level and moving with the vehicles, and being bungie-cord-extracted by airplane from the xxth floor of a building wouldn't be suited to 3D?![]()
Well...we got it in the second film. And 'gritty' or not...it was still just as exciting and visually energetic as any 'more suitable' sci-fi-ish stuff out there. So I don't see how it makes it any less worthy of 3D. If anything, it should lend itself more to the experience by actually putting us 'in there' even more.Not with Nolan's gritty style and the fact that we have no clue that anything of that magnitude will be included in the 3rd film. There most likely will, but we dont know fo sho.
Shooting entirely in IMAX will be much less likely, just from a practicality and cost standpoint (as we've discussed in an earlier thread). Now...I'm in no rush to make a big transition to 3D either...but despite Nolan's Batman films not being futuristic-CG-extravanganzas, they're by no means unsuitable for 3D. I mean...who wouldn't want to feel like the muzzles on those Batpod guns were just inches away from your face as it weaved its way through cars and debris?All that needs to be done is shooting the entire movie in IMAX. No 3D, just beautiful IMAX resolution. Now that will make everyone happy.
If it's the process that's done after the film is mastered (in 2D), he might not have to.I don't see how 3-D will enhance Nolan's work, but then again I'm sure it would detract from it either. I guess we'll just have to see. I do wonder how Nolan will react to this, since it appears he has no say in the matter.
I seriously can't see what's the big tragedy.
True. But who knows, he might really hate 3D.If it's the process that's done after the film is mastered (in 2D), he might not have to.
Plus...it's not like they won't show it in regular 2D theaters, which still make up the majority of venues around the world....and not want to sell those tickets.
True. But who knows, he might really hate 3D.![]()