OutOfBoose
#ReleaseTheAyerCut
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 18,162
- Reaction score
- 3,980
- Points
- 103
The Matrix isn't a Ghost in the Shell adaptation.The Matrix did that 20 years ago.
The Matrix isn't a Ghost in the Shell adaptation.The Matrix did that 20 years ago.
During their pitch to WB, they literally showed them Ghost in the Shell.The Matrix isn't a Ghost in the Shell adaptation.

And it makes sense, because The Matrix was influenced by Ghost in the Shell in terms of action and aesthetic. But the subject is entirely different.During their pitch to WB, they literally showed them Ghost in the Shell.![]()
As I stated in the post on the previous page, I don't think '95 cannot be surpassed. They just didn't in this particular case. And they didn't even try, because they were more interested in recreating 20 years old visuals and sound.Also if you are going to go in with the idea that something cannot be surpassed, of course it won't be. Still not sure what about the original makes it unable to be surpassed. Its good, its moody, but it doesn't exactly have the best writing and has a lot of style over substance to it.
Actually considering the concept of consciousness and what it means to be "alive" are a big part of The Matrix, that is very similar subject matter.And it makes sense, because The Matrix was influenced by Ghost in the Shell in terms of action and aesthetic. But the subject is entirely different.
Well, the entire movie really. I do like the philosophizing, but that is really all it is. Philosophizing. It ask questions it never gets close to answering. You don't end the movie on the joining without exploring it. And yet they do.As I stated in the post on the previous page, I don't think '95 cannot be surpassed. They just didn't in this particular case. And they didn't even try, because they were more interested in recreating 20 years old visuals and sound.
Also, give me an example of style over substance in '95 film.
I'd rather say blurred line between humans and machines is perhaps the closest thing they have, but it can be said about all sci-fi films, that feature machines. In The Matrix it's not the prime theme. It focuses on the concept of reality, free will, fate, religion. The world of the Matrix overall can be just about anything, because it's a very powerful concept. It can explore any theme.Actually considering the concept of consciousness and what it means to be "alive" are a big part of The Matrix, that is very similar subject matter.
Perhaps we put different meaning into "style over substance". For me it's pretty visuals, that have little to do with the narrative. For example, close up of a dripping water tap in Batman v Superman. Or Aquaman slo-mo mid jump with a pretty swing of the trident in Justice League.Well, the entire movie really. I do like the philosophizing, but that is really all it is. Philosophizing. It ask questions it never gets close to answering. You don't end the movie on the joining without exploring it. And yet they do.
Eh, will get some hate for this, I prefer this to the anime film.
There. You can meet me at a popeyes parkinglot, if ya'll want to fight.
BvS and SS have their admirers. Ghost in the Shell: Pot-head Edition will too.

Grace Randolph called this film "boring and racist". I may not agree with her so much, but this claim is a little extreme even for her.
Eh, will get some hate for this, I prefer this to the anime film.
There. You can meet me at a popeyes parkinglot, if ya'll want to fight.

Every version of Ghost in the Shell is for stoners.
Even the cerebral, navel gazing stuff.![]()
That's what I'm talking about. But in case of GitSINO it's a requirement. Otherwise you won't see poetry and depth of the new film.Every film is for stoners.
We truly see the film. ☺️
Every film is for stoners.
We truly see the film. ☺️
Grace Randolph called this film "boring and racist". I may not agree with her so much, but this claim is a little extreme even for her.
Don't have much of a desire to see this in theaters, but I'll certainly check it out at some point when it's available on Netflix or Amazon Prime.
One of my friends, who is a big fan of the original movie, saw this film last night and said he loved it. *shrug*
I'm not trusting the critics on this one, to be honest. Considering the "controversy," I bet a lot of critics felt compelled to write bad reviews ... Just like how all of their positive reviews for the truly, painfully awful Ghostbusters remake seemed like they had guns held to their heads to say what they said.
Also, Grace Randolph is a dimwit. One of my least favorite film critics on YouTube.