The Amazing Spider-Man Dunst "Definitely on board" Spider-Man 4

My post was removed? What a joke. There just really isn't a single mod on these boards that has anything resembling a sense of humor is there?
 
In all honestly, no. There has been a serious gestapo feel to these boards for a while now. You can't even sneeze without mod approval.
 
Actually I meant if you were surprised that your tasteless post got removed. I admit certain mods got recently a little more uptight than usual, but that post of yours was unnecessary.
 
With the announcement that Snaggle Tooth...errr.. Flappy Jacks... errr.. Kirsten is back as MJ (GweMJ*cough*)... I truely fear for SM4 and the franchise as a whole.

Assuming, that Kirsten was actually "wooed" back as having an intricate role in SM4, and NOT simply coming back for the Cashcow Paycheck that is SM4 for her. And a BIG ASSUMPTION that is too.

But assuming it is true, that Kirsten has an intricate role in SM4, I fear. I fear because that means MORE all about "that girl". More at the expensive of Dr. Connors and the Connors Clan's development. Especially the development when it comes to Peter, as his adopted family he never truely had.

I fear that MJ's role in the film will once again give us a watered down villain and the villains Alter-ego. I fear it will once again, give us more emo Peter, or Saturday Night Peter (staying alive.. strutting his stuff), or pouty/crying face Peter.. over MJ and his/their relationship.

SHEEESH.. has Raimi even read one comic??? Just ONE???

I fear storyline will be sacrificed to satisfy the OVER inflated ego on one Kirsten (Snaggle Flappy :cwink:) Dunst.

The ONLY storyline that MJ could add to significantly, that would not simply be another spin/reshash of the WB dramatics we have seen in SM1-SM3 with Peter/MJ is.... Dare I Dream... MJ's death (in place of Gwen's death in this perverse timeline Raimi has spun). And of course... NOT at the hands of a Goblin either.. so much for the "Goblin Legacy". (Pity)

But I can only IMAGINE the crying that would come on these boards IF the "precious" MJ were to die, instead of Gwen. So... I DOUBT SERIOUSLY that Raimi has the balls, nor the will.. to be "Dragged to Hell" by the fans if he DARES to follow such a storyline (pun intended).

So... get our your WB "hankies" my fans... Good Times are here AGAIN (*NOT*)... with the signing of our BELOVED Snaggle...errr.. Flappy... errrr... Kirsten... to the "hollow"ed :cwink: role of GweMJ...errrr.. MJ.

And by the way Kirsten.. I will NOT hold my breath waiting on my Christmas Card from you this year. :woot:


How can you be worried for the franchise if you've panned all the films thus far?
 
Tasteless? Unnecessary? Its was a joke! It was one big joke! Has everyone lost their sense of humor? Lemme get this straight.... You can't make a sex joke anymore? Not even one that was actually commented on as being funny by the majority of the posters who read it?

Its thanks to people like you who think that its ok to tell people what is tasteless and unnecessary and report posts for no reason other than their own screwed up sense of "morality", which is primarily based in telling others that they're "bad" so you yourself can feel better.
 
I don't report, I ignore. And my list is about to grow.
 
Your the one who started talking to me pal, don't trip over your own ignorance. Put me on your ignore, stop talking to me all together, I don't care. People like you are the reason why these boards have been going straight to hell.
 
Although I object to Dr. Octopus returning due to thematic reasons (as well as ruining Spider-Man 2's excellent closure to his character arc), under no circumstances should anyone EVER have "amnesia" in order to find a lazy route around plot obstacles. Spider-Man 3 did this..and it was ultimately, I think most would agree, the weakest developed plot line in the film.

Not a bad point, I'll concede. However the worse part of spider-man 3 was not that: It was putting in Venom while having no idea who and what Venom truly is; and ruining the character.
 
Oh they have not.

Slag has been here as long as I have and although I don't agree with some of his opinions, he's always presented them with proper conduct.

If you find that you are being constantly censored, perhaps this is not the best forum for you to express your opinion. Or maybe you need to figure out a more diplomatic way of presenting your opinion.

There are completely uncensored sites like 4chan that allow for complete freedom of speach.
 
What is speach? Like a fruit.

The board still has rules we have to abide by if we want to post here.

Posts like Slag's make me even happier if Dunst is coming back. Seeing Slag's anguish that is.
 
I'm not talking about me specifically, I'm talking about the boards in general.

Don't give me the "These boards have rules" crap, because in most of the cases, including this one, these censorship have NOTHING to do with the rules.
 
If you made some derogatory statement about Dunst, maybe they should've been censored.

A couple years ago, people were *****ing about her getting pregnant and ugly so she should be fired from Spider-man 3 because of some tabloid photos that were rumored to be her buying some medicine or something because of her pregnancy . . . that wasn't true.
 
What is speach? Like a fruit.

The board still has rules we have to abide by if we want to post here.

Posts like Slag's make me even happier if Dunst is coming back. Seeing Slag's anguish that is.

mmmm speach

:)
 
maybe sony pictures needs to write better contract stating tobey and kirsten have to stay in shape for the movie
 
I agree. Tobey was in fantastic shape for 1 and in 3...he was just average. To me, that says that he is losing love for the character:o
 
they can't say they aren't getting paid enough either.
 
How can you be worried for the franchise if you've panned all the films thus far?

Panned all the films thus far????? *Seriously Dude... Learn to Read :cwink:

I have always felt SM1 was the best of the bunch, even though I thought Doc Ock (in SM2) was the most visually thrilling villain ever on the big screen. And, I thought the fight scenes were outstanding in SM2. :up: A comic nerd's wet dream if you will, and I include myself in that.

Now, for those confused easily, just cause there were aspects of ALL the films that clearly disappointed me, does NOT mean I panned all the films. Heck, I even enjoyed SM3.

Overall though, I am disappointed with SM3 the most, because I think it had some very high potential for true greatness, and simply settled for popcorn fare (albeit.. entertaining popcorn fare at times).

Hope that "clears it up" for ya :cwink:
 
What is speach? Like a fruit.

The board still has rules we have to abide by if we want to post here.

Posts like Slag's make me even happier if Dunst is coming back. Seeing Slag's anguish that is.


I "aim" to please. *pulls out bow and arrow... Hmmm.. Snaggletooth or VileOne.. Decisions.. Decisions
 
Trust me, people will appreciate who we pick, because it'll be a big part of New York."

I'm going to approach this from left field and say I wouldn't be surprised if it was Electro. I mean Electro as a villain can be a big part of New York in two ways.

Obviously the first way in which Electro could be a big part of New York would be his ability to control massive quantities of electricity; he can bring New York to a stand still.

Secondly I think New York would be a good setting for a normal blue collar guy, who wanted to be an electrical engineer but was told he wasn't intelligent enough so settled for a job lower on the ladder, who is involved in a tragic accident that turns him into a freak.
 
Panned all the films thus far????? *Seriously Dude... Learn to Read :cwink:

I have always felt SM1 was the best of the bunch, even though I thought Doc Ock (in SM2) was the most visually thrilling villain ever on the big screen. And, I thought the fight scenes were outstanding in SM2. :up: A comic nerd's wet dream if you will, and I include myself in that.

Now, for those confused easily, just cause there were aspects of ALL the films that clearly disappointed me, does NOT mean I panned all the films. Heck, I even enjoyed SM3.

Overall though, I am disappointed with SM3 the most, because I think it had some very high potential for true greatness, and simply settled for popcorn fare (albeit.. entertaining popcorn fare at times).

Hope that "clears it up" for ya :cwink:


You should get that twitchy right eye checked out.

I'm saving this as it is literally the first time I have read you complimenting these movies.

hmmm, I recall back in the day there was someone who had said they were boycotting SM. For some reason i thought that might have been you, I'm trying to remember who it could have been now... that's going to bug me all day.
 
Evan Rachel Wood Drops Out of Film to Star in Spider-Man

June 10, 2009
by:
Bridget Daly

evanrachelwood.jpg



Evan Rachel Wood is set to play Mary Jane Watson in the Broadway edition of Spider-Man. Hollyscoop first reported the news of the casting back in December.

But then scheduling conflicts got in the way for Evan, causing her to second guess her commitment to the Broadway show. But Moviefone has just confirmed that Evan is indeed on board as Mary Jane, and has pulled out of another movie to make things work. The website reports Wood has quit Zach Snyder’s Sucker Punch.

Evan also spoke with Sci Fi Wire about the upcoming Braoadway show, saying, "We're still looking for our Spider-Man, but it's going to be incredible. I just spoke with [director] Julie [Taymor] today, actually. It's going to be a crazy rock 'n' roll circus show. Julie's doing what she did with The Lion King to this: She's just taking it to a whole 'nother level."

Who could her co-star be?? They need a young important Hollywood actor who can sing and act. They’d better not ask Zac Efron, because he’s over musicals. But maybe Chace Crawford wouldn’t mind doing a Broadway stint after he’s done taking Zac’s leftovers in the Footloose remake!
http://www.hollyscoop.com/movies/ev...s-out-of-film-to-star-in-spider-man_1543.aspx
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"