Wilhelm-Scream
Avenger
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Messages
- 46,284
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
man I hate that.ShadowBoxing said:Boy this place gets quiet when evidence and facts start appearing
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
man I hate that.ShadowBoxing said:Boy this place gets quiet when evidence and facts start appearing
How could the attacks be faked in such a massive operation? Surely one of the hundreds of people involved would step forward and declare what they know to the media.
This removes them from any counter evidence since if everyone involved is a puppet then all information to the countrary is deceptful...obviouslyFirst, most of the participants in the operation had no idea they were participating in it
Second, many of the key participants in the operation already belonged to intelligence agencies from one of the participating countries, principally (at a guess) the CIA, MI6, and Mossad
The true nature of 911 could be called the secret that keeps itself. It had predecessors in both American and middle eastern history in which the true perpetrators of terrorist acts had already been painted as victims, in effect, by the media. From the Gulf of Tonkin incident which triggered the Vietnam War back to the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1945 which enabled the creation of the the state of Israel, the attack of 911 is hardly an isolated example. Moreover, the Operation Northwoods plan (now public under the FOIA) called for airliners to be crashed into public buildings to provide an excuse for the invasion of Cuba.
In a nutshell, American and British Oil interests would benefit hugely from the resulting invasions of Afghanistan, namely in a pipeline corridor from the central Asian oil fields to the existing middle eastern pipeline network, including new terminal facilities at Haifa. The Iraqi oil fields are the main prize, however
Al Qaeda is almost certainly a long-term black operation that began shortly after the end of close cooperation between Ousama Bin Laden and the Mujahadeen with the United States in Afghanistan during the 1990s. Bin Laden, who is known to have suffered from terminal kidney disease, was visited by the CIA section chief in a hospital in Dubai in mid-2001. He survived just long enough after 911 to issue a statement that the attacks were not his work or the work of any Muslim. The denial appeared in a Pakistani newspaper, but was ignored by western news sources. In the words of one of a Panel member from the intel community, Al Qaeda is us.
In view of the fact that the same pattern of anomalous circumstances surrounds both previous and subsequent attacks attributed to Al Qaeda (see OTHER ATTACKS - this website), Al Qaeda appears to serve as a kind of universal boogeyman to herd frightened western legislators into a neo-fascist political program that will, in the long run, result in dictatorial powers concentrated in the hands of a small cadre in Washington.
So therefore indicates absolutely nothingMullah Muhammad Omar, supreme leader of Afghanistan's Taliban, condemned the Attack on America and claimed that Osama bin Laden was not responsible. Mullah Omar condemns this act. Mullah Omar says Osama is not responsible, said a Taliban spokesman. We have brought peace to this country and we want peace in all countries.
No you're absolutely incorrect, the entire report is a criticism of the levels of government involved in preventing the attacks. Specifically NORAD, Air traffic Control, the Air Force, CIA and the Bush and Clinton Administrations....the report concluds by saying that both administrations ignored the information given to them...it is not attempt to place blame on highjackers since that was not its purpose.FlameHead said:A series of observations (which reads like a bood) all pointing to Bin Laden causing the attacks the way they say it did.
What's funny is that in the report, it doesn't explain building 7's collapse. It also falsly reports that the core of each building consisted of "a hollow steel shaft" whereas in reality the core of each consisted of 47 massive steel columns. It also fails to report why the collapse of the WTC's saw 10 standard features of controlled demolions.
These are only a few examples...
Commission Chair Thomas Kean declared that both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had been "not well served" by the FBI and CIA [1]. The commission interviewed over 1,200 people in 10 countries and reviewed over two and a half million pages of documents, including some closely-guarded classified national security documents. Before it was released by the commission, the final public report was screened for any potentially classified information and edited as necessary.
ShadowBoxing said:No you're absolutely incorrect, the entire report is a criticism of the levels of government involved in preventing the attacks. Specifically NORAD, Air traffic Control, the Air Force, CIA and the Bush and Clinton Administrations....the report concluds by saying that both administrations ignored the information given to them...it is not attempt to place blame on highjackers since that was not its purpose.
JLBats said:Why do all your posts involve some... horrible web of lies?
rdh007 said:Because life is made up of a horrible web of lies?
JLBats said:I admit I am not totally unbiased. I am more terrified by the concept of terrible Reptilians controlling the world than anything else, but I've never understood how a creature could biologically morph into a completely different species... just by drinking that species blood. It doesn't make any sense to me.
TheSumOfGod said:So... they're "lies" because you personally choose not to lend them any credibility? Did I understand you correctly, or should I nominate you for the first annual "Massive Rolleyes Award".
FlameHead said:Thirsty for information? Check these sites out.
http://www.physics911.net/
http://letsroll911.org/
http://www.911sharethetruth.com/
http://www.911truth.org/
http://www.reopen911.org/
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/
http://www.ny911truth.org/index.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/
http://911review.com/
http://www.911truthseekers.org
http://www.911truthmovement.org/
http://www.911blogger.com/
And some of many videos:
http://www.vidilife.com/index.cfm?f...92C-5&vchrJoinMedia=3C3B75AB-29EF-40D8-992C-5 - 911: Road to Tyranny
http://fpidocument.blogspot.com/2005/12/call-911.html - CAll 911
http://www.freepressinternational.com/CBC911.html - CBC on 9/11
http://www.freepressinternational.com/911-great-conspiracy-video.html - The Great Conspiracy
http://freepressinternational.com/pentagonstrike.html - Questioning the Pentagon Strike
http://www.freepressinternational.com/loose-change-911-video.html - Loose Change
In fact, just go to the following site. It has plenty available.
http://www.freepressinternational.com/911.html
FlameHead said:Sum, I agree with you here but, we have to remember that this is very difficult conversation to accept. We are pretty much pulling down walls that have been built and people are confortable with these walls. Some people will and are having a hard time believing that their own government could do such a thing.
Having said that, my purpose in talking about this is not to prove the American Government was involved and indeed pulled these attacks off. My purpose is merely to discuss the incredibly apparant web of lies. If not the lies, the the physical and/or impossibilities of how they're telling us that day happened.
ShadowBoxing said:Boy this place gets quiet when evidence and facts start appearing
Actually I have taken 10 political science classes and written a few published essays and worked in several political organizations and my resume is currently circulating through the charleston public policy office smarta$$...so in fact I do know quiet a bit about politics. In fact our department is so highly estemed that one of our students is writing the forward and editing a book for a local politician...exactly what degree in Political Science do you possessTheSumOfGod said:That's it. For weeks now, you've been acting in a paternizing way, acting as if you "knew better" than everyone else just because you've read a few textbooks in college, as if you had some personal experience of the inner workings of American politics.
I figured that you had to be in your 40's or 50's.
Then you were stupid and arrogant enough to say to me "You can't be expected to understand politics very well at your age", so I decided to look up your age in your public profile.
YOU'RE 21 years old!!!
I'm 3-4 years OLDER than you are!
So **** already, you arrogant, paternizing a**.
Strange said:Here's what I think about the whole government envolvement. If Bush did plan this out, for whatever reason, wouldn't it be in osama bin laden's best interest to say he had nothing to do with it and that was an american conspiracy? It seem that if he did do that it would cause more harm to America then just taking credit for it and making himself out to be a scapegoat.
boyscouT said:
boyscouT said:
Back to the same old brain washing crap...yep you being 24 really makes you smart, so smart in fact you endoctrinate yourself to every David Icke theory that hits the market. David doesn't care about people like me, he knows he'll never hook myself or anyone else with experience. He preys on people like you, people who are so full of sh--. People who claim to want the "truth". You never wanted to truth, because if you wanted the truth first you'd realize there is no such thing...second you'd actually go out and research your position and from the research develop a founded position. You've already founded your position and that is the "establishment" is lying to you. Nothing I say can change your mind because all the photos I post are "faked" or news I post is from "reptilians" or some such nonsense. Live in your world of non facts and unfounded opinions. If it makes you happy, I guess its all right then. I'll just enjoy when Steven Colbert comes on TV and makes fun of people just.like.you.TheSumOfGod said:(ShadowBoxing) You allowed yourself to be endoctrinated, and you obviously obtain a sense of great superiority from this. Way to go.
It means anyone who doesn't agree with him and has factually based arguments must be brainwashed x infinity (yes I am mocking him)boyscouT said:
TheSumOfGod said:Bin Laden DID plan to bring down the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and the Capitol building. But unbeknownst to him, his 19 amateurish hijackers were neutralized by American intelligence community early on. They wouldn't have been able to fulfill their mission anyway, they couldn't even fly a freakin' plane. But Bin Laden was convinced that his men were responsible for 9/11, although he did say in one of his videos: (paraphrase from memory) "I'm surprised the towers were completely destroyed, I just thought that the top part would fall off unto the street and the buildings besides it." Which is precisely what would have happened if it wasn't for the pre-set explosives.