Game of Thrones - Book Readers' Thread - - - - - Part 22

Discussion in 'Game of Thrones' started by Thread Manager, Mar 9, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. godisawesome Registered

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,037
    Likes Received:
    840
    In regards to
    Roose being killed by Ramsay, I don't think the concept and Ramsay's portrayal in the scene is bad at all. The only issue is the show's Roose being stupid enough to allow Ramsay to hug him while still armed. Book!Roose comes off as the most properly paranoid evil overlord in all of literature, what with even being smart enough to only eat dishes eaten by Wyman Manderly even when the fat man's going as hard as possible for sycophant.

    I feel the show wanted to emphasize Ramsay as Jon's complete opposite, so making him the sole Bolton opponent served that, and considering we're about to get a reuniting if Jon with his Stark loyalties, contrasting that with Ramsay going full traitor and kinslayer works best.
     
  2. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Thats exactly my problem... Roose in the books would just laugh at any attempt of anything Ramsay did without his knowledge or approval.
     
  3. TheVileOne Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Messages:
    67,808
    Likes Received:
    12,275
    So regarding this:

    Does this mean that battle description from an extra on how a certain battle at Winterfell is going down is accurate?
     
  4. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    I wonder how [BLACKOUT]Jon[/BLACKOUT] will feel about the Lord of Light now? Will he acknowledge R'hllor, believe in him, honor him, thank him, or just chalk it up to strange magic and not think about it at all?
     
  5. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    I don't know how this changed the battle for winterfell

    [blackout] they say Rickon gets killed by arrows right in front of jon... but then there is also a flayed child on an X that is on fire in the same episode... Unless it's Ollie or something... not sure how much faith we can have in those spoilers[/blackout]
     
  6. Victarion Iron Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    20,499
    Likes Received:
    4
    I wonder if
    in death Jon encountered the Heart of Ice or Heart of Fire. More book-related since the show hasn't specifically referenced them. I'd imagine Jon may have had a brush with whatever it is that Melisandre's religion calls the god of darkness and death.
     
  7. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    "Doesn't matter, had sex."

    No idea. I don't think he will act like Stannis about it if he does... I'd prefer he just kept the old gods and worried about other matters.
     
  8. Boom I got nothin'

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2003
    Messages:
    53,225
    Likes Received:
    16,956
    Can't wait to see the look on Thorne's and Ollie's faces.
     
  9. Victarion Iron Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Messages:
    20,499
    Likes Received:
    4
    Might just be me, but I have a hard time hating Ollie. Kid saw his parents butchered by wildlings. I can't blame him for the way he's acted.
     
  10. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    Killing his mentor? yea hes a ****er.

    Anyways, Marvolo is going to kill me... but...

    [BLACKOUT]Davos once again had no reason to protect the body... UNTIL he mentioned resurrection to Mel... Why not have that dialogue in the first scene with her in ep 1? Giving them a real reason to be protecting the body and risking their lives?

    All that would happen to the body is the NW burning it... which Tormund even said he was going to do himself. So ... no reason to protect it until the res mention.[/BLACKOUT]
     
  11. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    and before you say it, Marv... they don't need to preserve Jon's body in order to retake the nights watch. And no... Tormund did not need proof, as seen.
     
  12. DarthSkywalker Regular As Clockwork (he/him)

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    120,800
    Likes Received:
    52,696
    Being an irrational little **** who then murders the best man on Earth? I blame him more then most.
     
  13. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    I wasn't going to say that. I still think him preserving it made sense even before the resurrection was mentioned. I thought he was doing it because he wanted to give Jon a respectful send off rather than leaving him in the snow for Thorne.

    But now we know he was thinking about resurrection from the start. However if does raise the question why he didn't mention it when he saw Mel in Episode 1, but I guess he wanted to deal with the Thorne situation first before he broached the subject with Mel. The Onion Knight works in mysterious ways.:o
     
  14. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    The proper send off is burning him though... The Watch would have burned him... everyone, even Alliser, respected Jon. There was no sign of like necrophilia or anything lol ... Tormund even says lets burn him.
     
  15. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    ...well... Ollie may have done some messed up things...


    But no one else...

    Just Ollie...


    just..... Ollie..
     
  16. DarthSkywalker Regular As Clockwork (he/him)

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    120,800
    Likes Received:
    52,696
    Exactly. It will always be nonsensical.

    By the way, did the spoilers turn out to be true. It is only just starting for me over here.
     
  17. Brother Jack Coffee and Contemplation

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    10,363
    Likes Received:
    1,955
    Well, he is a child. He did something truly horrible and is undeserving of forgiveness but the bloodlust many have for him I still find disturbing.
     
  18. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    I think it's kind of ****ed up to allow the people that betrayed and murdered Jon to burn him. Seems disrespectful to me. It essentially a funeral when you put someone on a pyre. The murderers shouldn't be the ones handling the funeral of the person they killed. They don't deserve to be there.

    If someone you know or respect was murdered would you want the murderer at the funeral? I wouldn't. But once they were in the room they couldn't light a pyre and they couldn't go back outside and do it without Thorne slaughtering them. They were in a sticky wicket.
     
  19. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    But all this is moot because apparently his reasoning for doing it was that he wanted to get Mel to try to resurrect Jon. Davos wanted to resurrect him and D&D decided to not outright reveal that in the first hour of the season. I can see how it would seem contrived last week, but now that we know his reasoning, and Davos has come out and said it, it shouldn't seem contrived anymore to anyone. He saved Jon's body so that it could hopefully be resurrected. That's a good reason to protect Jon's body.

    This show's seasons have always worked best when viewed with as few breaks as possible.
     
    #994 Marvolo, May 2, 2016
    Last edited: May 2, 2016
  20. Reek _____

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    53,058
    Likes Received:
    2,343
    we should take over the show.
     
  21. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    Send a raven to Wun Wun. He loves busting into places.:D
     
  22. TheVileOne Registered

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Messages:
    67,808
    Likes Received:
    12,275
    Ollie wasn't ready to let go of his hatred. Has everyone forgotten what the Wildlings did to his family?
     
  23. Doctor Jones Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,446
    Likes Received:
    6,214
    So in the past three episodes we've had three "shocking" [BLACKOUT]murders of lords from their relatives... I don't know about you but stuff like this makes the show a parody of itself. GRRM is better at killing people than this. I didn't necessarily mind Euron killing Balon (better than just showing a guy falling off a bridge I suppose) but Ramsay killing mother****ing Roose Bolton was infuriating. Not because he did a hateful thing but because it was bad writing. And Dorne... yeesh guys. I could not be more apathetic. Just go away.

    And no Dany was nice. Also as predictable as that ending was, it's good to have Jon back. [/BLACKOUT]

    I don't know I told myself I wouldn't watch this show again, but after this I think I got my fill. I'm just waiting for the book now because this show has wasted its potential from spectacular books. Yet it's so ****ing hard to have the strength when Martin takes a whole childhood writing them.
     
  24. Marvolo Registered

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    47,796
    Likes Received:
    10,730
    [​IMG]
     
  25. Doctor Jones Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    40,446
    Likes Received:
    6,214
    But not when it's poorly executed. It's not like the writers don't have control over how these fictional characters die.

    If Martin did kill Bolton like this then I'll be disappointed. But I'm heavily sensing this was the work of D&D. Christ... these two need to be replaced but it's too damn late because no one's going to tell them different.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"